oppn parties Allahabad HC Affirms That SRS Is A Constitutional Right

News Snippets

  • Supreme Court will appoint an observer for the mayoral poll in Chandigarh
  • Government makes it compulsory for plastic carry bag makers to put a QR or barcode with their details on such bags
  • GBS outbreak in Pune leaves 73 ill with 14 on ventilator. GBS is a rare but treatable autoimmune disease
  • Madhya Pradesh government banned sale and consumption of liquor at 19 religious sites including Ujjain and Chitrakoot
  • Odisha emerges at the top in the fiscal health report of states while Haryana is at the bottom
  • JSW Steel net profit takes a massive hit of 70% in Q3
  • Tatas buy 60% stake in Pegatron, the contractor making iPhone's in India
  • Stocks return to negative zone - Sensex sheds 329 points to 76190 and Nifty loses 113 points to 23092
  • Bumrah, Jadeja and Yashasvi Jaiswal make the ICC Test team of the year even as no Indian found a place in the ODI squad
  • India take on England in the second T20 today at Chennai. They lead the 5-match series 1-0
  • Ravindra Jadeja excels in Ranji Trophy, takes 12 wickets in the match as Saurashtra beat Delhi by 10 wickets. All other Team India stars disappoint in the national tournament
  • Madhya Pradesh HC says collectors must not apply NSA "under political pressure and without application of mind"
  • Oxfam charged by CBI over violation of FCRA
  • Indian students in the US have started quitting part-time jobs (which are not legally allowed as per visa rules) over fears of deportation
  • Enforcement Directorate is reported to have frozen nearly Rs 500cr in the accounts of 8 payment gateways including Paytm, Razorpay and PayU
Nation celebrates Republic Day with pomp and vigour //////// Dazzling parade showcasing India's military might and culture in Delhi with Indonesian President as chief guest
oppn parties
Allahabad HC Affirms That SRS Is A Constitutional Right

By Our Editorial Team
First publised on 2023-08-25 14:31:59

About the Author

Sunil Garodia The India Commentary view

The unstated principle of conduct for bureaucrats in India is - when in doubt, sit on the file. This was in evidence in a recent case in the Allahabad High Court when the UP Director General of Police did not take any decision on the plea for sex reorientation surgery (SRS) submitted by a constable experiencing gender dysphoria. Perhaps the DGP was not aware of the Supreme Court judgment in Nalsa vs Union of India or the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019. The court had to remind the DGP that "there should be no doubt that a person experiencing gender dysphoria, whose emotional and psychological attributes align with the traits of the opposite sex, possesses a constitutionally acknowledged right to undergo surgical gender change."

The court also said that "failing to acknowledge this inherent right would perpetuate gender identity disorder syndrome within our modern society. In certain cases, this syndrome can have severe consequences, including anxiety, depression, negative self-perception, and discomfort with one's own sexual anatomy. When psychological interventions prove ineffective in alleviating such distress, surgical gender transition should be deemed necessary and actively encouraged." It passed an order directing the UP Police to take a decision on the application. "The authority may request the submission of relevant materials and documents to assess whether the application warrants genuine consideration. Such a request must be supported by cogent material," it added.

This ruling will go a long way in ensuring that employers, both from the government and private sector, will now be more aware of the needs and rights of their transgender employees and hopefully not deny them the rights available to them under law or discriminate against them. The journey of transgender rights in India from legal invisibility to constitutional acknowledgment in the past decade is nothing short of remarkable. The Allahabad High Court order serves as a pivotal milestone, highlighting the rights of transgender individuals to undergo gender affirmation surgery. This ruling not only addresses healthcare and employment concerns but also exemplifies the continuing progress toward a more inclusive and equitable society.