oppn parties Allahabad HC Affirms That SRS Is A Constitutional Right

News Snippets

  • Supreme Court releases Neeraj Singhal, promoter of Bhushan Steel, on bailas the ED had not shared the ground of his arrest with him. The court said that the accused has to be released if the arrest is not as per statutory procedure
  • N Chandrasekaran, chairman of Tata Sons, took home Rs 135cr in FY24
  • Carnage at Dalal Street: Sensex plunges 1017 points to 81184 and Nifty 283 points to 24852
  • Neeraj Chopra qualifies for Diamond League finale in Brussels
  • Rahul Dravid joins Rajasthan Royals as head coach on a mutli-year contract
  • After Harvinder Singh in archery, Praveen Kumar wins gold in high jump at Paris Paralympic
  • Paris Paralympic: Shuttlers assure medals as Nitesh Kumar and Suhas Yahtiraj enter finals of their events and Manisha Ramadass enters semifinals
  • 47 Indians trapped in cyber scam centres in Laos have been rescued by the Indian embassy in the country
  • Gujarat toll now 47 as no respite in sight from the torrential rainfall lashing the state
  • IMD says that there will above-normal rainfall in September and floods and landslides are likely in North India
  • BJP leader T Michael Haopkip's house set on fire by a violent mob in Churachandrapur district
  • Cow vigilantes lynch a labourer from Bengal in Haryana's Charkhi Dadri district on suspicion of eating beef
  • Veteran actor in the Malayalam film industry, Mohanlal, said that the entire industry is answerable for the issues raised in the Hema committee report
  • DGCA to probe fire in engine episode of the Indigo flight from Kolkata to Bengaluru
  • Election Commission defers Haryana polls to October 5, counting on October 8
West Bengal governor refers the Aparajita (Rape) Bill to the President
oppn parties
Allahabad HC Affirms That SRS Is A Constitutional Right

By Our Editorial Team
First publised on 2023-08-25 14:31:59

About the Author

Sunil Garodia The India Commentary view

The unstated principle of conduct for bureaucrats in India is - when in doubt, sit on the file. This was in evidence in a recent case in the Allahabad High Court when the UP Director General of Police did not take any decision on the plea for sex reorientation surgery (SRS) submitted by a constable experiencing gender dysphoria. Perhaps the DGP was not aware of the Supreme Court judgment in Nalsa vs Union of India or the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019. The court had to remind the DGP that "there should be no doubt that a person experiencing gender dysphoria, whose emotional and psychological attributes align with the traits of the opposite sex, possesses a constitutionally acknowledged right to undergo surgical gender change."

The court also said that "failing to acknowledge this inherent right would perpetuate gender identity disorder syndrome within our modern society. In certain cases, this syndrome can have severe consequences, including anxiety, depression, negative self-perception, and discomfort with one's own sexual anatomy. When psychological interventions prove ineffective in alleviating such distress, surgical gender transition should be deemed necessary and actively encouraged." It passed an order directing the UP Police to take a decision on the application. "The authority may request the submission of relevant materials and documents to assess whether the application warrants genuine consideration. Such a request must be supported by cogent material," it added.

This ruling will go a long way in ensuring that employers, both from the government and private sector, will now be more aware of the needs and rights of their transgender employees and hopefully not deny them the rights available to them under law or discriminate against them. The journey of transgender rights in India from legal invisibility to constitutional acknowledgment in the past decade is nothing short of remarkable. The Allahabad High Court order serves as a pivotal milestone, highlighting the rights of transgender individuals to undergo gender affirmation surgery. This ruling not only addresses healthcare and employment concerns but also exemplifies the continuing progress toward a more inclusive and equitable society.