oppn parties Ayodhya Dispute: No More Mediation, The Court Should Decide On Facts

News Snippets

  • Flipkart assures employees that there will be no job or salary cuts due to the COVID-19 pandemic
  • Although it was obvious, but the government still clarifies that there is no need to switch off appliances and only lights need to be switched off on April 5 at 9pm after confusion in the minds of some people
  • PM Modi and President Trump decide "to deploy full strength of (Indo-US) partnership" to fight against COVID-19
  • 17 states have reported 1023 cases of coronavirus linked to the Tablighi Jamaat, which translates to 30% of all positive cases in India
  • The government says people should not use alcohol-based hand sanitizers before lighting diyas or candles on April 5
  • The railways say there is no certainty yet when services will resume after the lockdown and a final decision will be taken in the next few days
  • As coronavirus cases multiply in Assam, six north-east states seal their borders with the state
  • Power System Operation Corporation Ltd. (POCOSO) putting all systems and protocols in place at war-footing to ensure there is no grid failure due to reduction in demand on April 5 at 9 pm
  • Power ministry scotches rumours that the power grid might fail due to the 9-minute blackout called by PM Modi on Sunday, April 5
  • Centre asks people to wear home-made masks if it is absolutely essential for them to step out of homes
  • Centre asks states to allow licensed street vendors to sell essential items
  • 8000 samples were tested across India on April 2, but the government said that testing will be need-based and will not be used as a confidence-boosting measure
  • Air India operating special flights to fly passengers stuck in India since the lockdown
  • For the first time in history, Darjeeling loses first flush tea due to suspension of garden work for Covid-19 outbreak
  • Supreme Court asks journalists to be responsible and publish only the official version of news after it was brought to its notice that migrant exodus started after the 'fake' news that the lockdown will be extended to three months
Total count stands ar 3082 as India records 16 Covid-19 deaths, the highest in a single day
oppn parties
Ayodhya Dispute: No More Mediation, The Court Should Decide On Facts

By Sunil Garodia

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Writes for a number of publications.

What will happen in the Ayodhya title suit in the Supreme Court? On the one hand, the apex court has asked all the parties to indicate when they will be able to finish arguments so that the court can decide the time it will take for it to write the judgment while on the other, two parties - Nirvani Akhara and Sunni Wakf Board - have petitioned the court to resume mediation.

The court is hearing the case on a daily basis in order to let the parties finish their arguments fast and allow the court the time to write the judgment before Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, part of the bench hearing the case retires on November 17, 2019. This is necessary as if he retires before the case is over it will require the setting up of a new bench and a lot of time will be unnecessarily wasted in a case which is almost on the verge of being decided.

Then, it is being reported that the mediation process had covered much ground and only a few parties across the religious divide were left to be convinced. Other reports say that the mediation process never took off and no party was willing to commit anything. Among these conflicting reports, the mediation panel's short note to the court that parties want resumption of the process should be ignored. For, when things are moving ahead in the court and ample time had been provided to the panel, there is no point in resuming the process that was stalled by the intransigence of a few parties.

It will be best if the title suit is decided on the merits of the documents submitted and the arguments made in court. Any mediation process can be successful only if parties show flexibility. But since religious sentiments are involved and there are hardliners on both sides, one feels that it will be difficult for them to indulge in a give and take and settle the issue. The Babri Masjid Action Committee (BMAC) has already rejected the efforts to renew mediation. Hence, the court should put a stop to these renewed efforts and decide the case on merit. 

Post Script

Even as this article was being written, the Supreme Court has allowed the mediation process to resume. But it has also said that the negotiations must remain confidential and the court process will continue as it has reached "an advanced stage". Although there is no harm in continuing the process alongside the hearings in the court (and the court can take cognizance of any settlement arrived in such mediation if it happens before it is ready to write the order), one feels that nothing will come out of it. One says so because some major parties, like the BMAC and the Vishwa Hindu Parishad are not ready to accept mediation. Without their acceptance, it will be impossible for the panel to present anything worthwhile to the Supreme Court. The court has allowed this only because it has always favoured a negotiated settlement and does not want to deprive the willing parties another chance even at this late stage.