oppn parties Blanket Removal Of Security Was Wrong

News Snippets

  • Government to introduce PF for self-emplyed and gig workers
  • Crush at Puri Rathyatra leaves 2 dead and 78 injured
  • NEET-UG, marred in controversy due to pape4r leak, saw a huge increase in top scores as two scored 715/720 and 11.2 lkah candidates cleared the exam
  • India's first hydrogen-powered train will be flagged off by PM Modi from Jind in Haryana
  • Delhi HC asks the government to monitor Sona Wnagchuk's health regularly
  • TMC Rajya Sabha MP Koel Mallick resigns from her seat, leaves TMC. Mamata asks all those wishing to leave the party to do so before July 21
  • Calcutta HC says land deed is not a proof of citizenship. Refuses to provide protection to a man facing deportation on basis of land deed
  • Supreme Court tells the government to teach the third language in the 3-language formula in Class 6 and not Class 9
  • Government to take steps to boost liquidity for small businesses
  • RBI says that banks cannot sell seized assets back to the defaulters
  • Centre decides to take equity stakes in semiconductor startups
  • Markets remain flat on Thursday: Sensex closes just 1 point ahead and Nifty ended 5 point lower
  • BCCI:Selectors have possibly decided that Rohit Sharma will not be selected for ODIs after the Lord's game on Sunday
  • Japan Open badminton: P V Sindhu stuns world no. 5 Han Yue of China 21-16, 21-14 to enter the quarterfinals
  • 2nd ODI versus England: Indian batting fails miserably except Gill, Kohli and Iyer to score just 233 all out. England win by 4 wickets
Supreme Court clarifies that it has not issued a blanket ban on use of bulldozers, and they can be used after compliance with procedure laid down in civil laws
oppn parties
Blanket Removal Of Security Was Wrong

By Our Editorial Team
First publised on 2022-05-30 06:42:11

About the Author

Sunil Garodia The India Commentary view

The ghastly murder of Congress leader and Punjabi singer Sidhu Moose Wala, allegedly by Canadian gangsters, just a day after his security was trimmed/removed by the Punjab government as per its policy of doing away with the so-called 'VIP culture' in the state is tragic. It also proves that there are certain areas where policy decisions cannot be taken in a blanket manner without examining the details of individual cases.

Punjab faces a shortage of police personnel as a huge number of cops are deployed at all times to protect sundry persons most of whom are politicians or other prominent citizens, giving rise to what AAP has termed the 'VIP culture'. But removing/trimming their security at one fell stroke was not right as the state is duty bound to protect citizens who are threatened after assessing the threat perception.

It is true that many such persons apply for security based on misconceptions about threats to personal safety. It is also true that moving about with security detail gives some of these persons a high, a feeling of self-importance and they relish it. But it is also true that some of them do carry a threat to their personal safety, as the Moose Wala incident shows. Although the Supreme Court has ruled that no one can ask for security from the state as a matter of right, it has also said that the police authorities will appraise the threat before taking a decision on whether security needs to be provided.

The AAP government in Punjab should have independently assessed the current threat perception to these persons before withdrawing their security. Not every 'VIP' asks for security without any reason. It is upon the government to find out if they actually need it. It was wrong on part of the AAP government in Punjab to withdraw the security of a large number of people without assessing the threat perception.