oppn parties Criminal Procedure Law: Poorly Drafted, Violates Rights

News Snippets

  • SP drops two candidates owing allegiance to Azam Khan from Rampur and Moradabad
  • In Assam, a controversy erupted after a picture of UPPL leader Benjamin Basumatary, lying on a stack of Rs 500 notes circulated on social media. UPPL is an ally of the BJP
  • AAP's Jalandhar-West MP Sushil Kumar Rinku joins the BJP. He was the only AAP Lok Sabha MP
  • Supreme Court dismisses Centre's plea to review its 2023 verdict in the PMLA case
  • Close save for passengers as they remain unhurt after the wings of two planes graze at Kolkata airport. Pilots derostered and inquiry ordered by DGCA
  • Bengal BJP leader Dilip Ghosh gets notice from the EC as well as the BJP for making ugly remarks about Mamata Banerjee's parentage
  • Sadanand Vasanth Date, who faught terrorists in the 26/11 attack and was awarded the Preisent's Police medal, has been appointed the head of the NIA
  • Centre will borrow Rs 7.5L cr in the first six months of FY25, nearly 50% of the target for the full year
  • 25 stocks, including SBI, will see same day trade settlements from today in the world's fastest settlement mode in both BSE and NSE
  • Stocks recover smartly on Wednesday: Sensex rises 526 points to 72996 and Nifty 118 points to 22123
  • Tennis: Rohan Bopanna-Matthew Ebden reached the semifinals of the Miami Open
  • IPL: records tumble as SRH beat MI in a high-scoring match. SRH score 277/3 with 18 sixes and Mumbai score 246 with 20 sixes to fall short by 31 runs. Atotal of 38 sixes, highest in an IPL match were hit and both teams combined to score 523 runs, the highest aggregate in an IPL match
  • Amul will launch fresh milk in the US
  • IPL: RCB beat Punjab by 4 wickets as Kohli and Karthik shine with the bat
  • India strongly objected to German foreign office remarks over the arrest of delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal, called it "biased assumptions"
Delhi Lt Governor Vinai Kumar Saxena says government cannot be run from jail, hints at President's Rule in the capital ////// In a dangerous incident, the wings of two planes grazed while taxiing on the runway at Kolkata airport, all passengers were safe but DGCA ordered an inquiry and the pilots were derostered
oppn parties
Criminal Procedure Law: Poorly Drafted, Violates Rights

By Our Editorial Team
First publised on 2022-03-30 10:09:13

About the Author

Sunil Garodia The India Commentary view

The main problem with new laws or amendments to existing laws that are introduced or carried out is often that they are poorly drafted, do not take into account conflicts with other existing laws or are never designed with the thought that they will pass the constitutional test. Further, most of the terms used in the drafting are vague, arbitrarily used or not properly defined. That makes these laws prime candidates for being challenged in courts. Hence, the main purpose of these laws - that to simplify things and reduce legal wrangling - is never achieved and instead they become the subject of numerous court cases.

The Criminal Procedure (Identification) Bill 2022, introduced in the Lok Sabha recently, is an example of one such law. It is no one's case that police investigations should be done with reference to outdated laws (in this case the Identification of Prisoners Act, 1920) since the tools of investigation have changed with rapidly changing technology. There is definitely a need to update the law. But such upgrade cannot be at the cost of violation of right to privacy. What the new bill essentially proposes to do is to collect a huge amount of data from an expanded list of persons by even a head constable. This data will include fingerprints, palm-print impressions, foot-print impressions, photographs, iris and retina scans, physical, biological samples (which can include taking hair and blood samples for DNA profiling), signatures, handwriting or any other examination prescribed in the Code of Criminal Procedure and some of it without the sanction of a magistrate, as is now the law. It seeks to make the police or other investigating agencies the sole judge of whose and what data to collect.

The Bill, as it stands, is not likely to pass the test of constitutionality as it uses vague terms, does not provide assurance of data protection and violates right to privacy, among other rights. It should be redrafted before being made law to ensure that the legitimate interests of the state are served without violating the rights of the individual.