oppn parties Is It Fair To Keep Him In Custody?

News Snippets

  • Government to introduce PF for self-emplyed and gig workers
  • Crush at Puri Rathyatra leaves 2 dead and 78 injured
  • NEET-UG, marred in controversy due to pape4r leak, saw a huge increase in top scores as two scored 715/720 and 11.2 lkah candidates cleared the exam
  • India's first hydrogen-powered train will be flagged off by PM Modi from Jind in Haryana
  • Delhi HC asks the government to monitor Sona Wnagchuk's health regularly
  • TMC Rajya Sabha MP Koel Mallick resigns from her seat, leaves TMC. Mamata asks all those wishing to leave the party to do so before July 21
  • Calcutta HC says land deed is not a proof of citizenship. Refuses to provide protection to a man facing deportation on basis of land deed
  • Supreme Court tells the government to teach the third language in the 3-language formula in Class 6 and not Class 9
  • Government to take steps to boost liquidity for small businesses
  • RBI says that banks cannot sell seized assets back to the defaulters
  • Centre decides to take equity stakes in semiconductor startups
  • Markets remain flat on Thursday: Sensex closes just 1 point ahead and Nifty ended 5 point lower
  • BCCI:Selectors have possibly decided that Rohit Sharma will not be selected for ODIs after the Lord's game on Sunday
  • Japan Open badminton: P V Sindhu stuns world no. 5 Han Yue of China 21-16, 21-14 to enter the quarterfinals
  • 2nd ODI versus England: Indian batting fails miserably except Gill, Kohli and Iyer to score just 233 all out. England win by 4 wickets
Supreme Court clarifies that it has not issued a blanket ban on use of bulldozers, and they can be used after compliance with procedure laid down in civil laws
oppn parties
Is It Fair To Keep Him In Custody?

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2021-10-07 09:26:42

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Author of Cyber Scams in India, Digital Arrest, The Money Trap and The Human Hack

Is continued custody of Aryan Khan justified? As his custody ends today, it has been reported that the NCB will seek further custody as it needs to question him regarding links with drug peddlers. But is custodial interrogation really needed in such a case? Considering the fact that the NCB has already held him for a week, has questioned him continuously, alone and maybe with the others arrested with him and has gone through his mobile and noted the contents and further considering the fact that Khan has been cooperating in the investigation, there really is no need to keep him, as well as the others, in custody. The law is clear on this matter: if the accused is cooperating with the investigation, is not likely to abscond, tamper with evidence or threaten witnesses, bail must be granted.

No doubt possessing narcotic substances or having links with drug peddlers with the intention of buying drugs is a crime, Aryan is innocent till proven guilty. The only fact that he was present in the party where drugs were found does not automatically make him guilty. It is the job of NCB to prove his guilt. But for that, it does not need to keep him in custody indefinitely. If it is unable to complete the interrogation to its satisfaction in a week, it might not be able to do so in a month or three months. Further, since Aryan is cooperating, he should be given conditional bail and asked to further cooperate with the agency as and when required. If need be, his passport can be impounded if the court thinks that he might flee, although it is highly unlikely. But further incarceration would be unfair in this case and despite NCB plea, bail should be granted. NCB must stop the grandstanding in this case.