oppn parties It Is Not Rape Only If It Is Consensual Sex

News Snippets

  • Government to introduce PF for self-emplyed and gig workers
  • Crush at Puri Rathyatra leaves 2 dead and 78 injured
  • NEET-UG, marred in controversy due to pape4r leak, saw a huge increase in top scores as two scored 715/720 and 11.2 lkah candidates cleared the exam
  • India's first hydrogen-powered train will be flagged off by PM Modi from Jind in Haryana
  • Delhi HC asks the government to monitor Sona Wnagchuk's health regularly
  • TMC Rajya Sabha MP Koel Mallick resigns from her seat, leaves TMC. Mamata asks all those wishing to leave the party to do so before July 21
  • Calcutta HC says land deed is not a proof of citizenship. Refuses to provide protection to a man facing deportation on basis of land deed
  • Supreme Court tells the government to teach the third language in the 3-language formula in Class 6 and not Class 9
  • Government to take steps to boost liquidity for small businesses
  • RBI says that banks cannot sell seized assets back to the defaulters
  • Centre decides to take equity stakes in semiconductor startups
  • Markets remain flat on Thursday: Sensex closes just 1 point ahead and Nifty ended 5 point lower
  • BCCI:Selectors have possibly decided that Rohit Sharma will not be selected for ODIs after the Lord's game on Sunday
  • Japan Open badminton: P V Sindhu stuns world no. 5 Han Yue of China 21-16, 21-14 to enter the quarterfinals
  • 2nd ODI versus England: Indian batting fails miserably except Gill, Kohli and Iyer to score just 233 all out. England win by 4 wickets
Supreme Court clarifies that it has not issued a blanket ban on use of bulldozers, and they can be used after compliance with procedure laid down in civil laws
oppn parties
It Is Not Rape Only If It Is Consensual Sex

By Sunil Garodia

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Author of Cyber Scams in India, Digital Arrest, The Money Trap and The Human Hack

Some people in the male-dominated society in India can go to any length to show women in a bad light by indulging in character assassination and by attributing motives to them. Further, when it comes to defense lawyers trying to get their obnoxious clients off the hook in rape crimes, this takes the form of fine art where lawyers try to prove the victim to be a woman of "loose morals" and thereby question her motives in 'falsely' accusing their client. But the Supreme Court has always taken a hard stance against this practice. It has always, and consistently, held that a woman's private life is not the subject matter in a rape case which is a clear case of a person having forced sex with her without her consent.

In the case that came up for hearing before the bench of CJI S A Bobde and justices B R Gavai and Surya Kant, it was found that the Allahabad High Court had granted bail to the accused on the basis of a medical report that suggested that the victim was "habituated to sex", the accused had no criminal record and the two could have been in a consensual relationship. The Supreme Court took strong exception to that. It clearly stated that "habituated to sex is no ground for grant of bail" and asked the accused to surrender before the court in Muzaffarnagar within four weeks.

Earlier, too, the Supreme Court had, in 1991 passed an order that clearly said that just because the victim was a sex worker did not mean she did not have any privacy. It said that "it is not open to any and every person to violate her privacy as and when he wishes". It further added that "even a woman of easy virtue is entitled to privacy and no one can invade her privacy as and when he likes".

That forms the crux of what has become famous in the slogan "no means no". Every woman has the right to say no and once she refuses to consent (or even if she consents but is below 18 years of age), no one can invade her privacy. It does not matter whether she is a sex worker, a woman "habituated to sex" or even if she has had previous sexual relations with the accused. It needs to be understood that rape is a crime where a man or a group of men have sex with a woman against her wishes. Hence, defense lawyers should desist from assassinating the woman's character and instead focus on evidence of consent or other things to prove their clients' innocence.