oppn parties It's Back To Academy For Errant UP Sessions Court Judge

News Snippets

  • Government to introduce PF for self-emplyed and gig workers
  • Crush at Puri Rathyatra leaves 2 dead and 78 injured
  • NEET-UG, marred in controversy due to pape4r leak, saw a huge increase in top scores as two scored 715/720 and 11.2 lkah candidates cleared the exam
  • India's first hydrogen-powered train will be flagged off by PM Modi from Jind in Haryana
  • Delhi HC asks the government to monitor Sona Wnagchuk's health regularly
  • TMC Rajya Sabha MP Koel Mallick resigns from her seat, leaves TMC. Mamata asks all those wishing to leave the party to do so before July 21
  • Calcutta HC says land deed is not a proof of citizenship. Refuses to provide protection to a man facing deportation on basis of land deed
  • Supreme Court tells the government to teach the third language in the 3-language formula in Class 6 and not Class 9
  • Government to take steps to boost liquidity for small businesses
  • RBI says that banks cannot sell seized assets back to the defaulters
  • Centre decides to take equity stakes in semiconductor startups
  • Markets remain flat on Thursday: Sensex closes just 1 point ahead and Nifty ended 5 point lower
  • BCCI:Selectors have possibly decided that Rohit Sharma will not be selected for ODIs after the Lord's game on Sunday
  • Japan Open badminton: P V Sindhu stuns world no. 5 Han Yue of China 21-16, 21-14 to enter the quarterfinals
  • 2nd ODI versus England: Indian batting fails miserably except Gill, Kohli and Iyer to score just 233 all out. England win by 4 wickets
Supreme Court clarifies that it has not issued a blanket ban on use of bulldozers, and they can be used after compliance with procedure laid down in civil laws
oppn parties
It's Back To Academy For Errant UP Sessions Court Judge

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2023-05-04 12:18:10

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Author of Cyber Scams in India, Digital Arrest, The Money Trap and The Human Hack

The Supreme Court has finally done what it had repeatedly threatened to do in the recent past. Piqued at trial court judges not adhering to its orders and guidelines regarding bail, it had said that it will send such judicial officers for retraining in the judicial academy. Now it has carried out this threat for a sessions court judge in UP. It has ordered the Allahabad HC to stop giving judicial work to the concerned judge and send him for retraining. This extraordinary decision on part of the Supreme Court is likely to have the intended effect - trial court judges will now apply their minds, study Supreme Court orders and guidelines and will grant bail when it due instead of routinely rejecting bail applications, even for minor crimes.

The Supreme Court has repeatedly said that bail must be granted if certain conditions are fulfilled. It has detailed these conditions. But a majority of trial court judges do not follow these orders and guidelines and routinely reject bail applications, resulting in unnecessary litigation and further load on the judicial system. The Supreme Court has done well to take this step.

But another, more serious, affair needs the urgent attention of the court. It must now turn its attention on public prosecutors who oppose bail applications despite its comprehensive 2022 guidelines in less severe crimes which carry a punishment of less than 7 years in jail which say that bail must be granted if the accused is cooperating. It must also train its lens on investigating agencies that arrest an accused in a less severe case (as defined above) on filing the chargesheet even though they are cooperating and were not arrested during the probe. Unnecessary arrests and placing hurdles in the bail process must not also be tolerated. The Supreme Court has repeatedly warned public prosecutors and investigating agencies not to go against its 2022 guidelines. Now it must also act against them.