oppn parties Judges And Their Assets

News Snippets

  • Supreme Court rules that functional disability should be the deciding factor in granting road accident damages and not any doctor-issued disability certificate
  • Supreme Court flagged the fact that nearly 56% of the vehicles plying in India were uninsured and asked the government to challan them
  • An Air India flight from Phuket to Delhi encountered severe turbulence and 17 passengers were admitted to hospital with injuries
  • Calcutta HC said that heavens won't fall if Vande Matram is made mandatory to sing in madrasas
  • Kolkata Municipal Corporation has sought government nod for increasing city's wards to 200+ to keep residents in each ward between 16000 to 18000
  • Government has said that partially filled online Census forms may be allowed
  • Government may allow fees on UPI payments above Rs 2000, except on transfer between two individuals
  • Brent crude falls below $80 per barrel
  • Government has increased the LIC offer for sale to Rs 31,400cr with an additional 4% on the block
  • Stock markets become nervous on Tuesday due to Gulf situation: Sensex slides 210 points and Nifty sheds 159 points ahead of RBI MPC meets today
  • Indian cricket team lands in Sri Lanka for a 2-Test series
  • A former French Navy pilot who had alleged that IAF had lost Rafales during Operation Sindoor has been held in France on spying charges
  • An ordinary zari worked living just 100km away from Kolkata was stunned to find Rs 100cr deposited in the bank account. The bank has frozen her account pending enquiry
  • Businessmen in Kolkata gets a Rs 5-crore extortion call, allegedly from the Lawrence Bishnoi gang
  • NTA floats tenders to secure offices and exam materials round-the-clock
Tarun Tejpal, former editor of Tehelka, was sentenced to 10 years in jail by Bombay HC for raping a colleague. This judgment overturns the acquittal by a Goa sessions court
oppn parties
Judges And Their Assets

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2023-08-09 07:14:10

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Author of Cyber Scams in India, Digital Arrest, The Money Trap and The Human Hack

The parliamentary standing committee on law and justice has recommended that it should be made mandatory for Supreme Court and High Court judges to declare their assets. As of now, it is voluntary on their part, but most of the judges do not make such declaration. With less than 20% of such judges declaring their assets voluntarily at any given point of time, the moral obligation does not cut ice with them despite Resolution 1997 asking them to do so.

The case for making it mandatory for judges to declare their assets is strong. For, any one holding an office of trust must always, for reasons of transparency and credibility, put in public domain how much they (including their spouses and dependants) are worth to ascertain if their assets match their known sources of income.

While it is no one's case to allege that all judges are corrupt and given to increase their net worth through unfair means, it is also true that a strong incentive to do so exists. Hence, it is necessary that judges declare their assets to show that they are living within their means. Although judges might place themselves on a pedestal higher than politicians and bureaucrats, the fact remains that they hold an office of trust and must be above suspicion. They must not only be pure but also appear to be so.

Hence, since Resolution 1997 is not being taken seriously and most of the judges are not voluntarily declaring their assets, the government must act upon the recommendation of the parliamentary standing committee and revive the Judicial Standards & Accountability Bill (that was passed by the Lok Sabha in 2012 but lapsed as the then government did not place it in the Rajya Sabha) to make it mandatory for judges to declare their assets.