oppn parties Judges And Their Assets

News Snippets

  • Government to introduce PF for self-emplyed and gig workers
  • Crush at Puri Rathyatra leaves 2 dead and 78 injured
  • NEET-UG, marred in controversy due to pape4r leak, saw a huge increase in top scores as two scored 715/720 and 11.2 lkah candidates cleared the exam
  • India's first hydrogen-powered train will be flagged off by PM Modi from Jind in Haryana
  • Delhi HC asks the government to monitor Sona Wnagchuk's health regularly
  • TMC Rajya Sabha MP Koel Mallick resigns from her seat, leaves TMC. Mamata asks all those wishing to leave the party to do so before July 21
  • Calcutta HC says land deed is not a proof of citizenship. Refuses to provide protection to a man facing deportation on basis of land deed
  • Supreme Court tells the government to teach the third language in the 3-language formula in Class 6 and not Class 9
  • Government to take steps to boost liquidity for small businesses
  • RBI says that banks cannot sell seized assets back to the defaulters
  • Centre decides to take equity stakes in semiconductor startups
  • Markets remain flat on Thursday: Sensex closes just 1 point ahead and Nifty ended 5 point lower
  • BCCI:Selectors have possibly decided that Rohit Sharma will not be selected for ODIs after the Lord's game on Sunday
  • Japan Open badminton: P V Sindhu stuns world no. 5 Han Yue of China 21-16, 21-14 to enter the quarterfinals
  • 2nd ODI versus England: Indian batting fails miserably except Gill, Kohli and Iyer to score just 233 all out. England win by 4 wickets
Supreme Court clarifies that it has not issued a blanket ban on use of bulldozers, and they can be used after compliance with procedure laid down in civil laws
oppn parties
Judges And Their Assets

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2023-08-09 07:14:10

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Author of Cyber Scams in India, Digital Arrest, The Money Trap and The Human Hack

The parliamentary standing committee on law and justice has recommended that it should be made mandatory for Supreme Court and High Court judges to declare their assets. As of now, it is voluntary on their part, but most of the judges do not make such declaration. With less than 20% of such judges declaring their assets voluntarily at any given point of time, the moral obligation does not cut ice with them despite Resolution 1997 asking them to do so.

The case for making it mandatory for judges to declare their assets is strong. For, any one holding an office of trust must always, for reasons of transparency and credibility, put in public domain how much they (including their spouses and dependants) are worth to ascertain if their assets match their known sources of income.

While it is no one's case to allege that all judges are corrupt and given to increase their net worth through unfair means, it is also true that a strong incentive to do so exists. Hence, it is necessary that judges declare their assets to show that they are living within their means. Although judges might place themselves on a pedestal higher than politicians and bureaucrats, the fact remains that they hold an office of trust and must be above suspicion. They must not only be pure but also appear to be so.

Hence, since Resolution 1997 is not being taken seriously and most of the judges are not voluntarily declaring their assets, the government must act upon the recommendation of the parliamentary standing committee and revive the Judicial Standards & Accountability Bill (that was passed by the Lok Sabha in 2012 but lapsed as the then government did not place it in the Rajya Sabha) to make it mandatory for judges to declare their assets.