oppn parties Judges And Their Assets

News Snippets

  • Sikh extremists attacked a cinema hall in London that was playing Kangana Ranaut's controversial film 'Emergency'
  • A Delhi court directed the investigating agencies to senstize officers to collect nail clippings, fingernail scrappings or finger swab in order to get DNA profile as direct evidence of sexual attack is often not present and might result in an offender going scot free
  • Uniform Civil Code rules cleared by state cabinet, likely to be implemented in the next 10 days
  • Supreme Court reiterates that there is no point in arresting the accused after the chargesheet has been filed and the investigation is complete
  • Kolkata court sentences Sanjoy Roy, the sole accused in the R G Kar rape-murder case, to life term. West Bengal government and CBI to appeal in HC for the death penalty
  • Supreme Court stays criminal defamation case against Rahul Gandhi for his remarks against home minister Amit Shah in Jharkhand during the AICC plenary session
  • Government reviews import basket to align it with the policies of the Trump administration
  • NCLT orders liquidation of GoAir airlines
  • Archery - Indian archers bagged 2 silver in Nimes Archery tournament in France
  • Stocks make impressive gain on Monday - Sensex adds 454 points to 77073 and Nifty 141 points to 23344
  • D Gukesh draws with Fabiano Caruana in the Tata Steel chess tournament in the Netherlands
  • Women's U-19 T20 WC - In a stunning game, debutants Nigeria beat New Zealand by 2 runs
  • Rohit Sharma to play under Ajinkye Rahane in Mumbai's Ranji match against J&K
  • Virat Kohli to play in Delhi's last group Ranji trophy match against Saurashtra. This will be his first Ranji match in 12 years
  • The toll in the Rajouri mystery illness case rose to 17 even as the Centre sent a team to study the situation
Calling the case not 'rarest of rare', a court in Kolkata sentenced Sanjay Roy, the only accused in the R G Kar rape-murder case to life in prison until death
oppn parties
Judges And Their Assets

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2023-08-09 07:14:10

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator.

The parliamentary standing committee on law and justice has recommended that it should be made mandatory for Supreme Court and High Court judges to declare their assets. As of now, it is voluntary on their part, but most of the judges do not make such declaration. With less than 20% of such judges declaring their assets voluntarily at any given point of time, the moral obligation does not cut ice with them despite Resolution 1997 asking them to do so.

The case for making it mandatory for judges to declare their assets is strong. For, any one holding an office of trust must always, for reasons of transparency and credibility, put in public domain how much they (including their spouses and dependants) are worth to ascertain if their assets match their known sources of income.

While it is no one's case to allege that all judges are corrupt and given to increase their net worth through unfair means, it is also true that a strong incentive to do so exists. Hence, it is necessary that judges declare their assets to show that they are living within their means. Although judges might place themselves on a pedestal higher than politicians and bureaucrats, the fact remains that they hold an office of trust and must be above suspicion. They must not only be pure but also appear to be so.

Hence, since Resolution 1997 is not being taken seriously and most of the judges are not voluntarily declaring their assets, the government must act upon the recommendation of the parliamentary standing committee and revive the Judicial Standards & Accountability Bill (that was passed by the Lok Sabha in 2012 but lapsed as the then government did not place it in the Rajya Sabha) to make it mandatory for judges to declare their assets.