oppn parties Landmark Judgment On Abortion

News Snippets

  • NCLT initiates bankruptcy proceedings against former Videocon chairman Venugopal Dhoot for defaulting on loans of Rs 6158cr as personal guarantor in two group companies
  • LIC approves 1:1 bonus share issue
  • Gold and silver futures also go down by 0.7% and 2.2% respectively
  • Stocks tumbled again on Monday as crude prices rose: Sensex went down by 703 points and Nifty by 207 points
  • Supreme Court refuses to cancel the land-for-jobs FIR against Lalu Prasad
  • The spectre of El Nino haunts India: IMD predicts 'below normal ' monsoon this year
  • Labour protest over increase in wages by 35% (as per Haryana example) turns violent in Noida, nearly 200 were detained by the police
  • Congress leader Sonia Gandhi said that the delimitation exercise must be carried out after the Census is complete
  • PM Modi says Parliament is on the verge of creating history as the Houses get ready to take up the women's reservation bills
  • Tata Sons chairman N Chandrasekaran said that TCS COO Aarthi Subramanian is conducting a thorough inquiry to establish facts and identify individuals involved in the sexual harassment allegations at the company's Nashik office
  • Asha Bhonsle laid to rest with full state honours on Monday in Mumbai
  • AAP leader Arvind Kejriwal once again approached the Delhi HC to request the recusal of a judge from his case
  • Candidates Chess: R Vaishali on the verge of creating history, but needs two wins - one with black pieces - against formidable opponents to emerge as the challenger
  • Rohit Sharma, who retired hurt in the match versus RCB, underwent scans for possible hamstring injury
  • IPL: Abhishek Sharma fails for SRH but Ishan Kishan (91) shines. Then, Vaibhav Sooryavanshi fails for RR and SRH bolwers, especially unheralded Praful Hinge (4 for 24) and Sakib Hussain (4 for 24) win it for SRH. This was the first loss for table-toppers RR
Supreme Court questions Election Commission about SIR SOP and why logical discrepancy was introduced only in Bengal
oppn parties
Landmark Judgment On Abortion

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2022-09-30 04:44:11

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Author of Cyber Scams in India, Digital Arrest, The Money Trap and The Human Hack

In a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court ruled that all women - married or unmarried - were entitled to safe and legal abortion up to 24 weeks of pregnancy under the Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP) Act, 1971. It relied on the amendment to the MTP Act in 2021 which replaced the word 'husband' with 'partner' and argued that it was not matrimony alone that resulted in unwanted pregnancies and the right of women on their bodies and the right to take decisions regarding that cannot be exclusively available to only married women. Before this judgment, single women were allowed legal abortions till the 20th week of pregnancy. The court has done away with the distinction and restored equality for all women. The court also said that it was entirely upon the woman to decide whether she is able to continue with her pregnancy and reliance ought to be placed on her decision.

More importantly, for the first time ever (even before another bench of the apex court decides whether the exception granted to husbands under rape laws is constitutional), the instant judgment recognized, though only for the limited purpose of the MTP Act, that pregnancies arising out of forced sex by husbands will also be covered under the given order. "The nature of sexual violence and the contours of consent do not undergo a transformation when one decides to marry. The institution of marriage does not influence the answer to the question of whether a woman has consented to sexual relations", the court said.

Also, the court said that the distinction between married and unmarried women has given rise to a misconception that unmarried women were not allowed to have abortions legally. By rectifying the situation, the court has ensured that unmarried women can now have safe and legal abortions instead of risking life by approaching unregistered practitioners.

In another extremely important decision, the court also said that the definition of women will include even those who were not biologically identified as women when they were born. This means that transpersons or those who had sex change operations to become women will now have the right to safe and legal abortion.