oppn parties Why Give Rewards To Policemen For Dereliction Of Duty?

News Snippets

  • Government to introduce PF for self-emplyed and gig workers
  • Crush at Puri Rathyatra leaves 2 dead and 78 injured
  • NEET-UG, marred in controversy due to pape4r leak, saw a huge increase in top scores as two scored 715/720 and 11.2 lkah candidates cleared the exam
  • India's first hydrogen-powered train will be flagged off by PM Modi from Jind in Haryana
  • Delhi HC asks the government to monitor Sona Wnagchuk's health regularly
  • TMC Rajya Sabha MP Koel Mallick resigns from her seat, leaves TMC. Mamata asks all those wishing to leave the party to do so before July 21
  • Calcutta HC says land deed is not a proof of citizenship. Refuses to provide protection to a man facing deportation on basis of land deed
  • Supreme Court tells the government to teach the third language in the 3-language formula in Class 6 and not Class 9
  • Government to take steps to boost liquidity for small businesses
  • RBI says that banks cannot sell seized assets back to the defaulters
  • Centre decides to take equity stakes in semiconductor startups
  • Markets remain flat on Thursday: Sensex closes just 1 point ahead and Nifty ended 5 point lower
  • BCCI:Selectors have possibly decided that Rohit Sharma will not be selected for ODIs after the Lord's game on Sunday
  • Japan Open badminton: P V Sindhu stuns world no. 5 Han Yue of China 21-16, 21-14 to enter the quarterfinals
  • 2nd ODI versus England: Indian batting fails miserably except Gill, Kohli and Iyer to score just 233 all out. England win by 4 wickets
Supreme Court clarifies that it has not issued a blanket ban on use of bulldozers, and they can be used after compliance with procedure laid down in civil laws
oppn parties
Why Give Rewards To Policemen For Dereliction Of Duty?

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2024-09-26 01:26:10

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Author of Cyber Scams in India, Digital Arrest, The Money Trap and The Human Hack

It Happens Only In India

It is only in India that law keepers, who defy rule of law and due process and assume the role of vigilantes, are feted by law makers for their 'brave' act. It is disgusting that politicians, instead of questioning the need of the police to fire to kill the main accused in the Badlapur sexual assault case, are falling over each other to 'reward' them.

Rewards For Dereliction Of Duty

Shiv Sena's Kalyan chief Mahesh Gaikwad has announced a reward of Rs 51000 for assistant inspector Nilesh More, who was injured in the alleged shootout. Not to be outdone, MNSs Thane and Palghar chief Avinash Jadhav has announced rewards for both More and his colleague Sanjay Shinde who fired the bullet that killed the accused.

Questions That Need Answers

It needs to be stated that the accused was shot in the head and the post-mortem report stated that he died of haemorrhagic shock and bleeding. Instead of raising pertinent questions like why the accused was shot in the head instead of his limbs (to injure and overpower him) and how he could manage to snatch a gun if his hands were securely tied, the politicians are behaving as if the policemen have done the right thing. This is likely to embolden them to carry out more such killings in future in complete disregard for rule of law, due process, the SOP to carry prisoners and, of course, their police training.

Rule Of Law Must Prevail

The increasing incidents of the police carrying out such extra-judicial killings cannot be condoned. Nor can the habit of politicians and others to fete those who carry them out as heroes. The accused must be made to stand trial. Their guilt must be proven in a court of law, even if they are caught red-handed. That is what rule of law and due process is all about. The police cannot act as judge, jury and executioner. For, today it is criminal dons, Maoists, terrorists and rapists they are after but if free licence is given to them, it will be the turn of ordinary citizens next. It must stop and if the administration is not capable of doing it, the Supreme Court must do the needful.