oppn parties Bengal: Cutting Off Ties With DVC Is Not Right

News Snippets

  • Government to introduce PF for self-emplyed and gig workers
  • Crush at Puri Rathyatra leaves 2 dead and 78 injured
  • NEET-UG, marred in controversy due to pape4r leak, saw a huge increase in top scores as two scored 715/720 and 11.2 lkah candidates cleared the exam
  • India's first hydrogen-powered train will be flagged off by PM Modi from Jind in Haryana
  • Delhi HC asks the government to monitor Sona Wnagchuk's health regularly
  • TMC Rajya Sabha MP Koel Mallick resigns from her seat, leaves TMC. Mamata asks all those wishing to leave the party to do so before July 21
  • Calcutta HC says land deed is not a proof of citizenship. Refuses to provide protection to a man facing deportation on basis of land deed
  • Supreme Court tells the government to teach the third language in the 3-language formula in Class 6 and not Class 9
  • Government to take steps to boost liquidity for small businesses
  • RBI says that banks cannot sell seized assets back to the defaulters
  • Centre decides to take equity stakes in semiconductor startups
  • Markets remain flat on Thursday: Sensex closes just 1 point ahead and Nifty ended 5 point lower
  • BCCI:Selectors have possibly decided that Rohit Sharma will not be selected for ODIs after the Lord's game on Sunday
  • Japan Open badminton: P V Sindhu stuns world no. 5 Han Yue of China 21-16, 21-14 to enter the quarterfinals
  • 2nd ODI versus England: Indian batting fails miserably except Gill, Kohli and Iyer to score just 233 all out. England win by 4 wickets
Supreme Court clarifies that it has not issued a blanket ban on use of bulldozers, and they can be used after compliance with procedure laid down in civil laws
oppn parties
Bengal: Cutting Off Ties With DVC Is Not Right

By A Special Correspondent
First publised on 2024-09-29 07:29:10

The release of excess water, allegedly without information to the Bengal government, by the Damodar Valley Corporation (DVC) has raised temperatures in Bengal. Bengal government claims that a large part of the catchment area was flooded due to such unilateral release of water, leading to loss of lives and damage to crop. The state's two representatives have resigned from the body. State chief minister Mamata Banerjee was asked about the speculation that the Centre would shift the headquarters of the DVC from Kolkata. She curtly replied that there is no need of an organisation that kills people.

But the matter is not as simple as it appears to be. DVC has said that protocols about informing the stakeholders before releasing the quantum of water were followed. If Bengal has two representatives, were they not informed about the quantum and timing of the act? If not, it was a serious lapse on part of the DVC and those responsible should be identified and suitably punished. But if they were informed, then the state government should desist from politicising the issue and admit its mistake in not taking preventive action or not impressing upon the DVC about how releasing such a huge quantity would lead to floods in the state. If there was a meeting to decide how much and when the water would be released, were Bengal representatives present in that meeting? What was their contribution in the discussion?  The minutes of the meeting should be made public.

The Bengal government contention that the DVC did not consult with it before releasing the water does is not valid if its representatives were there in the meeting. Since it is a fact that floods have happened, lives have been lost and crop has been damaged, this matter needs to be probed thoroughly and all sides should cooperate so that such things do not happen again. Bengal is also guilty of not dredging and this has reduced water storage capacity in its barrages. River embankments have not been repaired in the state and no action has been taken against illegal and rampant encroachments.

The Bengal government's decision to break ties with the DVC is not correct and might backfire in future. For, since it has withdrawn its representatives from the body, it will be in the dark about future water releases other than a notification from the DVC about its unilateral decision. It should reinstate its representatives and press for more say in decision-making for it affects the state.