oppn parties Madras HC Refuses To Stop Removal Of Temple On Public Land

News Snippets

  • Government to introduce PF for self-emplyed and gig workers
  • Crush at Puri Rathyatra leaves 2 dead and 78 injured
  • NEET-UG, marred in controversy due to pape4r leak, saw a huge increase in top scores as two scored 715/720 and 11.2 lkah candidates cleared the exam
  • India's first hydrogen-powered train will be flagged off by PM Modi from Jind in Haryana
  • Delhi HC asks the government to monitor Sona Wnagchuk's health regularly
  • TMC Rajya Sabha MP Koel Mallick resigns from her seat, leaves TMC. Mamata asks all those wishing to leave the party to do so before July 21
  • Calcutta HC says land deed is not a proof of citizenship. Refuses to provide protection to a man facing deportation on basis of land deed
  • Supreme Court tells the government to teach the third language in the 3-language formula in Class 6 and not Class 9
  • Government to take steps to boost liquidity for small businesses
  • RBI says that banks cannot sell seized assets back to the defaulters
  • Centre decides to take equity stakes in semiconductor startups
  • Markets remain flat on Thursday: Sensex closes just 1 point ahead and Nifty ended 5 point lower
  • BCCI:Selectors have possibly decided that Rohit Sharma will not be selected for ODIs after the Lord's game on Sunday
  • Japan Open badminton: P V Sindhu stuns world no. 5 Han Yue of China 21-16, 21-14 to enter the quarterfinals
  • 2nd ODI versus England: Indian batting fails miserably except Gill, Kohli and Iyer to score just 233 all out. England win by 4 wickets
Supreme Court clarifies that it has not issued a blanket ban on use of bulldozers, and they can be used after compliance with procedure laid down in civil laws
oppn parties
Madras HC Refuses To Stop Removal Of Temple On Public Land

By Linus Garg
First publised on 2022-01-31 07:04:59

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Linus tackles things head-on. He takes sides in his analysis and it fits excellently with our editorial policy. No 'maybe's' and 'allegedly' for him, only things in black and white.

The Madras High Court has refused to stop the removal of a temple built on public land. It rightly refused to consider the fact that since the temple was there at the place for the last 30 or so years, some kind of right had come upon the trust that ran the temple. The court insisted, as per law, for the trust to provide documents to prove ownership of land on which the temple was situated. Since the keepers of the temple could not provide any documents, the court refused to stay the removal.

It has become a regular practice for some people to build temples on public land. It starts as a small affair with a few pictures or statues placed below a tree or in some other place. Once devotees start thronging and making donations, the keepers get bold and start building structures. Finally, they approach some well-off devotees for funds and make a permanent structure. But this is completely against law.

When the local administration tries to remove such structures (they cannot be called temples in the strict sense as according to Hindu religion, the deity must be properly installed with pranprathistha which most of these structures do not do before placing the idol there) the bogey of religion and long- time possession is always raised to stop them. In the instant case, the court rightly said that if this plea is accepted, everyone will encroach upon pubic land.

The Madras HC order will now put a stop to this. The court rightly said that "God is omnipresent and does not need specific land for his Divine presence". The usurpation of public land by the so-called keepers of temples or trusts that seek to do so must be stopped. It is an unholy practice that is not sanctioned by law. People cannot be allowed to do whatever they feel like in the name of religion.