oppn parties Madras HC Refuses To Stop Removal Of Temple On Public Land

News Snippets

  • Actor Ranveer Singh gets extortion message from Bishnoi gang
  • Government changes IT intermediary rules reagrding reporting for AI generated content. Also, timeline for taking down unlawful content reduced to 3 hours from 36 hours
  • Bengal final voters' list to be published on Feb 28
  • CPI and CPM move Supreme Court for FIR against Assam CM Himanata Biswa Sarma over 'target-shooting' video
  • Government eyes ₹4650cr from the sale of 5.3% in Bhel
  • Tea Board mandates quality check for imported tea from May 1 to curb unrestricted imports and dumping by some countries
  • Stocks continue their bull run on Monday: Sensex gains 208 points and Nifty 67 points
  • Ranji Trophy: Bengal beat Andhra by an innings and 90 runs. Seminfinal lineup: Bengal versus J&K and Karnataka versus Uttarakhand
  • Asian Shooting: Aakriti wins silver and Anjum Moudgil bags bronze, India win silver in 50m Rifle 3 position
  • T20 WC: Pakistan beat USA, New Zealand beat UAE and Netherlands beat Namibia
  • Supreme Court says HC judges cannot assume roles of domain experts
  • Supreme Court issues notice to Bengal DGP on EC complaint on harassment of officers
  • Opposition to decide today whether to proceed on seeking removal of Lok Sabha Speaker for his decidiosn to advise PM Modi not to attend Lok Sabha fearing some action by women MPs
  • As directed by the Supreme Court, Enforcement Directorate forms SIT to probe money laundering by Anil Ambani
  • Supreme Court takes a hard stance over money siphoned from banks in cyber crime, directs for an SOP to be decided and blocking of suspect transfers
Opposition parties, except TMC, submit no-confidence notice against Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla
oppn parties
Madras HC Refuses To Stop Removal Of Temple On Public Land

By Linus Garg
First publised on 2022-01-31 07:04:59

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Linus tackles things head-on. He takes sides in his analysis and it fits excellently with our editorial policy. No 'maybe's' and 'allegedly' for him, only things in black and white.

The Madras High Court has refused to stop the removal of a temple built on public land. It rightly refused to consider the fact that since the temple was there at the place for the last 30 or so years, some kind of right had come upon the trust that ran the temple. The court insisted, as per law, for the trust to provide documents to prove ownership of land on which the temple was situated. Since the keepers of the temple could not provide any documents, the court refused to stay the removal.

It has become a regular practice for some people to build temples on public land. It starts as a small affair with a few pictures or statues placed below a tree or in some other place. Once devotees start thronging and making donations, the keepers get bold and start building structures. Finally, they approach some well-off devotees for funds and make a permanent structure. But this is completely against law.

When the local administration tries to remove such structures (they cannot be called temples in the strict sense as according to Hindu religion, the deity must be properly installed with pranprathistha which most of these structures do not do before placing the idol there) the bogey of religion and long- time possession is always raised to stop them. In the instant case, the court rightly said that if this plea is accepted, everyone will encroach upon pubic land.

The Madras HC order will now put a stop to this. The court rightly said that "God is omnipresent and does not need specific land for his Divine presence". The usurpation of public land by the so-called keepers of temples or trusts that seek to do so must be stopped. It is an unholy practice that is not sanctioned by law. People cannot be allowed to do whatever they feel like in the name of religion.