oppn parties Nirbhaya Verdict: Justice Done

News Snippets

  • Government to introduce PF for self-emplyed and gig workers
  • Crush at Puri Rathyatra leaves 2 dead and 78 injured
  • NEET-UG, marred in controversy due to pape4r leak, saw a huge increase in top scores as two scored 715/720 and 11.2 lkah candidates cleared the exam
  • India's first hydrogen-powered train will be flagged off by PM Modi from Jind in Haryana
  • Delhi HC asks the government to monitor Sona Wnagchuk's health regularly
  • TMC Rajya Sabha MP Koel Mallick resigns from her seat, leaves TMC. Mamata asks all those wishing to leave the party to do so before July 21
  • Calcutta HC says land deed is not a proof of citizenship. Refuses to provide protection to a man facing deportation on basis of land deed
  • Supreme Court tells the government to teach the third language in the 3-language formula in Class 6 and not Class 9
  • Government to take steps to boost liquidity for small businesses
  • RBI says that banks cannot sell seized assets back to the defaulters
  • Centre decides to take equity stakes in semiconductor startups
  • Markets remain flat on Thursday: Sensex closes just 1 point ahead and Nifty ended 5 point lower
  • BCCI:Selectors have possibly decided that Rohit Sharma will not be selected for ODIs after the Lord's game on Sunday
  • Japan Open badminton: P V Sindhu stuns world no. 5 Han Yue of China 21-16, 21-14 to enter the quarterfinals
  • 2nd ODI versus England: Indian batting fails miserably except Gill, Kohli and Iyer to score just 233 all out. England win by 4 wickets
Supreme Court clarifies that it has not issued a blanket ban on use of bulldozers, and they can be used after compliance with procedure laid down in civil laws
oppn parties
Nirbhaya Verdict: Justice Done

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2017-05-06 08:04:44

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Author of Cyber Scams in India, Digital Arrest, The Money Trap and The Human Hack
The Supreme Court has said that given the gravity and barbarity of the crime that shocked the world, the rapists of Nirbhaya must hang. The court has said that this is a fit case that falls in the rarest of the rare category and hence the death penalty must be invoked.

The court delved deep into the crime, the investigation, the evidence and the mentality of the accused before arriving at its decision. It termed the crime “brutal, barbaric and diabolic.” It took note of the fact that the accused had mala fide intentions in passing off the bus as public transport vehicle and picking up the girl and her companion. It termed the investigation fair, efficient and robust. It found the evidence irrefutable and strong enough to convict the accused.

While sentencing, the court also took a look at mitigating circumstances like the age of the accused, their station in life and their past criminal history. But in the end, the court awarded the death penalty as it was convinced that the accused posed a threat to society if let out in 14 to 15 years from now.

What went against the accused was the fact that apart from the gravest of crime of luring Nirbhaya into the bus and raping her, they displayed a sick mind by inserting iron rods in her private parts. As if that was not enough, they tried to kill both Nirbhaya and her companion by crushing them under the wheels of the bus. It was reported that the boy who was a juvenile when the crime was committed was the most ferocious of the gang. Nirbhaya’s dying declaration was also taken into account by the court.

Some people are of the opinion that an eye for an eye does not serve the ends of justice and that law must not play God. They also aver that the real purpose of justice is to reform the criminal. But if there was a crime whose perpetrators deserved the death penalty, this was it. A young life was brutally extinguished just to satisfy the lust of a few. They deserve to die.