oppn parties NRC: Wrong To Accuse Government of Discrimination

News Snippets

  • NCLT initiates bankruptcy proceedings against former Videocon chairman Venugopal Dhoot for defaulting on loans of Rs 6158cr as personal guarantor in two group companies
  • LIC approves 1:1 bonus share issue
  • Gold and silver futures also go down by 0.7% and 2.2% respectively
  • Stocks tumbled again on Monday as crude prices rose: Sensex went down by 703 points and Nifty by 207 points
  • Supreme Court refuses to cancel the land-for-jobs FIR against Lalu Prasad
  • The spectre of El Nino haunts India: IMD predicts 'below normal ' monsoon this year
  • Labour protest over increase in wages by 35% (as per Haryana example) turns violent in Noida, nearly 200 were detained by the police
  • Congress leader Sonia Gandhi said that the delimitation exercise must be carried out after the Census is complete
  • PM Modi says Parliament is on the verge of creating history as the Houses get ready to take up the women's reservation bills
  • Tata Sons chairman N Chandrasekaran said that TCS COO Aarthi Subramanian is conducting a thorough inquiry to establish facts and identify individuals involved in the sexual harassment allegations at the company's Nashik office
  • Asha Bhonsle laid to rest with full state honours on Monday in Mumbai
  • AAP leader Arvind Kejriwal once again approached the Delhi HC to request the recusal of a judge from his case
  • Candidates Chess: R Vaishali on the verge of creating history, but needs two wins - one with black pieces - against formidable opponents to emerge as the challenger
  • Rohit Sharma, who retired hurt in the match versus RCB, underwent scans for possible hamstring injury
  • IPL: Abhishek Sharma fails for SRH but Ishan Kishan (91) shines. Then, Vaibhav Sooryavanshi fails for RR and SRH bolwers, especially unheralded Praful Hinge (4 for 24) and Sakib Hussain (4 for 24) win it for SRH. This was the first loss for table-toppers RR
Supreme Court questions Election Commission about SIR SOP and why logical discrepancy was introduced only in Bengal
oppn parties
NRC: Wrong To Accuse Government of Discrimination

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2018-07-31 20:22:39

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Author of Cyber Scams in India, Digital Arrest, The Money Trap and The Human Hack
The publication of the final draft of National Register of Citizens in Assam, with the names of more than 40 lakh applicants missing, has led to charges that the government has been selective and has tried to discriminate against Muslims, Bengalis and Biharis. This charge is being raised by opposition parties as the BJP is currently in power in Assam. But would the results have been any different if the Congress was in power? For, the updating of the NRC is a process-based exercise relying on an application system that takes March 27, 1971 as the cut-off date for proving citizenship and has an exhaustive list of documents one can submit to support one’s claim. The data is examined thoroughly and although reasons for rejection have not been made public, it is almost impossible for a government to be selective.

It needs remembering that it was Rajiv Gandhi who signed the Assam accord with the AASU that paved the way for the updating of the NRC (last published in 1951). Since then, it was a major grouse in the state. The current process has been hastened and completed on the express direction of the Supreme Court. Hence, apart from facilitating the process and getting it completed, the present government has no hand in it. Further, this is just a final draft. Those who have been left out have time till September 30 to file objections.

Hence, instead of politicizing the issue, the opposition parties should ask their cadre to help the people who have been left out to complete the process for getting their names included. Those who are genuine citizens and have any of the prescribed documents have nothing to fear. The exercise has been undertaken to weed out “foreigners” or Bangladeshi citizens who swamped Assam in the wake of problems in the erstwhile East Pakistan or even after that and have been illegally residing in the state. One believes that no Indian, including Mamata Banerjee (who is leading the protests against the NRC), should object to that.

On the other hand, the government must inform the applicants why their applications have been rejected. This is their right and will help them in putting in correct objections that can lead to their claims being successfully verified. All efforts should be made to ensure that not a single Indian, whether Bengali, Punjabi, Bihari or from any other state of the nation, who has been residing in Assam post the cut-off date, is not left out. The purpose of the NRC is not to ensure an Assam only for the Assamese. All Indians have the right to stay in Assam. It is only those who have illegally entered the state from Bangladesh that need to be identified and weeded out.