oppn parties Pakistan Asked To Be Fair To Kulbhushan Jadhav

News Snippets

  • Amit Panghal becomes first Indian male to win silver at the World Boxing Championships
  • "Gully Boy" to be India's entry for the Oscars
  • Rajeev Kumar called an "absconder" by the CBI
  • Alipore court refuses to grant anticipatory bail to Rajeev Kumar
  • Trump likely to sign a mini trade deal with India next week
  • Government planning a loan mela to cover 400 districts in two phases
  • PM Modi says Kashmiris need a hug from all Indians
  • NPA tag will not be put on any MSME till March 20
  • Government likely to announce another economic stimulus package today ahead of the GST Council meet in Goa
  • Air Marshall RKS Bhadauria, slated to retire just a few days from now, to be the next chief of IAF
  • PM Modi slams politicians from his own party who are making irresponsible statements on the Ayodhya case and tells them to wait for the Supreme Court order
  • Telecom panel says resident welfare associations (RWA) cannot give monopoly access to any one service provider and infrastructure in public spaces and residential complexes will have to be shared by all
  • Mamata Banerjee meets Amit Shah, tells him there is no need for an NRC in Bengal
  • After 14 days, there is no hope left for reviving Vikram, the moon lander
  • CBI teams search for elusive Rajeev Kumar
PM Modi to address more than 50000 people at the Howdy Modi event in Houston today where he will be joined by the US president Donald Trump
oppn parties
Pakistan Asked To Be Fair To Kulbhushan Jadhav

By Sunil Garodia

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Writes for a number of publications.

Both India and Pakistan can claim to have won in the Kulbhushan Jadhav case in the International Court of Justice as the court issued a balanced order. But after a proper reading of the order, it becomes clear that barring annulment of Pakistan's military court proceedings that ordered Jadhav's execution on charges of spying, the ICJ has agreed to most of India's pleas. It is obvious that annulment can only be ordered if the order for execution stands after Pakistan reviews the decision as per the present ICJ order, allows consular access and proper legal representation to Jadhav during the review proceedings and if the ICJ finds it improper after such review.

It was India's contention that Pakistan had not followed due process in the Jadhav case by denying India consular access to the accused, by not allowing legal representation to the accused and by rushing through the proceedings. The ICJ concurred on all counts and directed that the execution be stayed, consular access be granted to India and the order to execute Jadhav be reviewed by Pakistan. It is not legally feasible to obtain an annulment order without giving the ordering authority a chance to set things right by reviewing its order. Hence, India's plea to annul should be viewed as a standard drafting procedure and arguments in regard to that will come later.

It is now up to Pakistan to ensure a fair trial for Kulbhushan Jadhav. Since the eyes of the entire world will now be focused on what it does next, Pakistan cannot assign the case to a military court once more where no outsiders are allowed. It will now have to get the case heard in a proper criminal court as per the Constitution of Pakistan. It will have to allow India consular access to Jadhav. It will also have to allow lawyers to represent Jadhav during the trial. A summary review will not do now. Any attempt to avoid the rule of law will prompt India to approach the ICJ again. The ICJ may then choose to annul the execution order and ensure that Jadhav is returned to India.