oppn parties Parliament: Measuring Only Quantitative Productivity Is Not Correct

News Snippets

  • Government to introduce PF for self-emplyed and gig workers
  • Crush at Puri Rathyatra leaves 2 dead and 78 injured
  • NEET-UG, marred in controversy due to pape4r leak, saw a huge increase in top scores as two scored 715/720 and 11.2 lkah candidates cleared the exam
  • India's first hydrogen-powered train will be flagged off by PM Modi from Jind in Haryana
  • Delhi HC asks the government to monitor Sona Wnagchuk's health regularly
  • TMC Rajya Sabha MP Koel Mallick resigns from her seat, leaves TMC. Mamata asks all those wishing to leave the party to do so before July 21
  • Calcutta HC says land deed is not a proof of citizenship. Refuses to provide protection to a man facing deportation on basis of land deed
  • Supreme Court tells the government to teach the third language in the 3-language formula in Class 6 and not Class 9
  • Government to take steps to boost liquidity for small businesses
  • RBI says that banks cannot sell seized assets back to the defaulters
  • Centre decides to take equity stakes in semiconductor startups
  • Markets remain flat on Thursday: Sensex closes just 1 point ahead and Nifty ended 5 point lower
  • BCCI:Selectors have possibly decided that Rohit Sharma will not be selected for ODIs after the Lord's game on Sunday
  • Japan Open badminton: P V Sindhu stuns world no. 5 Han Yue of China 21-16, 21-14 to enter the quarterfinals
  • 2nd ODI versus England: Indian batting fails miserably except Gill, Kohli and Iyer to score just 233 all out. England win by 4 wickets
Supreme Court clarifies that it has not issued a blanket ban on use of bulldozers, and they can be used after compliance with procedure laid down in civil laws
oppn parties
Parliament: Measuring Only Quantitative Productivity Is Not Correct

By Our Editorial Team
First publised on 2022-04-08 09:42:59

About the Author

Sunil Garodia The India Commentary view

The Budget session of Parliament was adjourned sine die two days before schedule on Thursday. While the opposition protested and said that the government did not want to have a discussion on the price rise, the government said the decision was taken after leaders from opposition parties including the Congress wanted a curtailment.

Lok Sabha speaker Om Birla said that the House had 27 sittings that lasted for 177 hours and 50 minutes during which 12 bills were passed and important debate took place on a host of issues. He said that the overall productivity stood at 127%. He thanked all parties for helping in increasing the productivity of the House. In the Rajya Sabha, chairman M Venkaiah Naidu said that the productivity stood at 99.8 percent.

But Parliament's performance cannot always be judged on quantitative parameters. Although the Budget session saw the passage of a good number of bills, the debate and discussion on a number of important bills, especially the Criminal Procedure (Identification) Bill, was not very reassuring. Bulldozing bills through Parliament is not the sign of a mature democracy. Time should be allotted for more discussion on important bills and qualitative performance of the Houses need to be given more importance.

But what was reassuring was that after the Houses adjourned sine die, Om Birla, along with Prime Minister Modi and Defence Minister Rajnath Singh met opposition leaders and discussed several issues relating to the smooth conduct of proceedings in Parliament. It is important that such meetings are held more frequently and the government must take the lead to carry all parties along in having healthy and meaningful discussion on issues of national importance as well get legislative work done in Parliament. If the government ignores the opposition, they disturb the proceedings to make themselves heard and it impacts productivity in a negative manner.