oppn parties Pegasus Snooping Allegations To Be Probed By A Panel Of Experts

News Snippets

  • Supreme Court rules that functional disability should be the deciding factor in granting road accident damages and not any doctor-issued disability certificate
  • Supreme Court flagged the fact that nearly 56% of the vehicles plying in India were uninsured and asked the government to challan them
  • An Air India flight from Phuket to Delhi encountered severe turbulence and 17 passengers were admitted to hospital with injuries
  • Calcutta HC said that heavens won't fall if Vande Matram is made mandatory to sing in madrasas
  • Kolkata Municipal Corporation has sought government nod for increasing city's wards to 200+ to keep residents in each ward between 16000 to 18000
  • Government has said that partially filled online Census forms may be allowed
  • Government may allow fees on UPI payments above Rs 2000, except on transfer between two individuals
  • Brent crude falls below $80 per barrel
  • Government has increased the LIC offer for sale to Rs 31,400cr with an additional 4% on the block
  • Stock markets become nervous on Tuesday due to Gulf situation: Sensex slides 210 points and Nifty sheds 159 points ahead of RBI MPC meets today
  • Indian cricket team lands in Sri Lanka for a 2-Test series
  • A former French Navy pilot who had alleged that IAF had lost Rafales during Operation Sindoor has been held in France on spying charges
  • An ordinary zari worked living just 100km away from Kolkata was stunned to find Rs 100cr deposited in the bank account. The bank has frozen her account pending enquiry
  • Businessmen in Kolkata gets a Rs 5-crore extortion call, allegedly from the Lawrence Bishnoi gang
  • NTA floats tenders to secure offices and exam materials round-the-clock
Tarun Tejpal, former editor of Tehelka, was sentenced to 10 years in jail by Bombay HC for raping a colleague. This judgment overturns the acquittal by a Goa sessions court
oppn parties
Pegasus Snooping Allegations To Be Probed By A Panel Of Experts

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2021-09-24 07:25:24

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Author of Cyber Scams in India, Digital Arrest, The Money Trap and The Human Hack

After the Centre did not file a proper affidavit (it filed a short one), the Supreme Court has decided to appoint a panel of experts to probe the allegations of snooping upon a wide cross-section of Indian citizens using the Pegasus spyware. This is welcome.

The Centre had cited national security concerns while refusing to file a detailed affidavit. It has said that terrorists will be alerted if it was to make pubic how and which software it uses to track their conversations and movements.

But the question in the Pegasus case is entirely different. When the Pegasus Project, an international collaborative project of journalists to probe illegal snooping using the spyware (reported in India by The Wire) disclosed that a huge number of top Indian politicians, journalists, bureaucrats and civil activists were on the list, the question asked of the government was whether it had purchased the spyware and if so, was it being used following due process. No names were needed to be disclosed. Just the legality of the whole process needed to be established. But the government did not even do that leading to opposition protests and an almost complete washout of the monsoon session of parliament.

But with the Supreme Court breathing down its neck, the government offered to set up a committee to go into the allegations. It is good that the Supreme Court has itself set up a panel for the task as it will have more credibility. Since questions of right to privacy, personal freedom, unauthorized surveillance and matters of legality and due process are involved, the nation has the right to know who hacked into the phones (as preliminary investigations reveal that they were indeed hacked) of the persons on the list in the Pegasus Project report and whether due process was followed in doing so. If the government did not do so, as it claims, for national security concerns it should also be deeply interested in probing who did it.