oppn parties POCSO Act Cannot be Extended to Mentally Retarded Adults

News Snippets

  • Mobile operators Vodafone-Idea and Airtel decide to raise tariffs from next month
  • Sharad Pawar meets Sonia Gandhi and says more time needed for government formation in Maharashtra
  • Justice S A Bobde sworn in as the 47th Chief Justice of India
  • Supreme Court holds hotels liable for theft of vehicle from their parking area if parked by valet, says "owner's risk" clause is not a shield from such liability
  • Finance Minister says she is receiving feedback from many sectors that recovery is happening as there is lower stress
  • Sabarimala temple opens, but police bar the entry of women below 50 years
  • Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman says Air India and BPCL to be sold off by March
  • Media person Rajat Sharma resigns as DDCA president
  • Shiv Sena, NCP and Congress postpone meeting the governor of Maharashtra
  • Shiv Sena not to attend the NDA meeting on 17th November, says break up "a formality"
  • Shiv Sena says that the confidence the BJP is showing about forming the government in Maharashtra is based purely on its expectation of getting numbers through horse trading
  • Anil Ambani resigns as director of the bankrupt Reliance Communications
  • India beat Bangladesh by an innings and 150 rums inside three days in the first Test. Indian pacers excel after Mayank Agarwal's double century
  • Sena-NCP-Congress work out a common minimum programme, will form the government soon and it will last 5 years, says Sharad Pawar
  • Income Tax Appellate Tribunal upholds the decision to withdraw the charitable status of Young India, making it liable to pay Rs 145 in income tax. Rahul Gandhi and Priyanka Vadra are the majority shareholders in the company
Two Muslim litigants in Ayodhya refuse to accept the Supreme Court order, say review petition might be filed
oppn parties
POCSO Act Cannot be Extended to Mentally Retarded Adults

By Sunil Garodia

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Writes for a number of publications.
The Supreme Court has refused to extend the scope of Prevention of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO), 2012 to mentally retarded adults. This is a correct stance as the judges themselves stated that it would amount to judicial overreach as well as it would try to bracket mentally retarded persons in a pre-set chamber whereas the disease has many angles and has to be examined technically.

The case on hand was that of a 38-year old suffering from cerebral palsy who was raped. The father of the victim contented before the court that since his daughter had the mental age equivalent to a “6 or 8 year old child,” her case should be tried according to provisions in the POCSO Act. The judges categorically stated that it was not the intention of the legislature to have such cases tried under the POCSO Act.

The court took pains to explain that the underlying theme behind the POCSO Act was to prevent children who were physically under 18 years of age from predators who, taking advantage of their lack of understanding of the situation and often through their position of trust molested them sexually. The court said it was upon the legislature to examine various facets and decide whether sexual crimes against mentally retarded adults having the mental age of a child below 18 could be tried under the Act.

The POCSO Act was enacted specifically to protect children under the age of 18. Although it is debatable whether the 18-year threshold is correct in this age and time, the idea behind the act is clear. Hence, if it was extended to mentally retarded adults, the focus of the act would get diluted. There is no doubt that cases of sexual crimes against such persons cannot be tried normally as the victim is incapable of providing evidence like a normal person. Hence, there should either be a separate law to deal with such cases or the Supreme Court should issue guidelines that the lower courts must adhere to while dealing with such cases. But these cases cannot, and should not, be tried under POCSO Act, nor should the Act be amended to include such cases within its ambit.