oppn parties Regulating Social Media Platforms

News Snippets

  • R G Kar rape-murder hearing start in Kolkata's Sealdah court on Monday
  • Calcutta HC rules that a person cannot be indicted for consensual sex after promise of marriage even if he reneges on that promise later
  • Cryptocurrencies jump after Trump's win, Bitcoin goes past $84K while Dogecoin jumps 50%
  • Vistara merges with Air India today
  • GST Council to decide on zero tax on term plans and select health covers in its Dec 21-22 meeting
  • SIP inflows stood at a record Rs 25323cr in October
  • Chess: Chennai GM tournament - Aravindh Chithambaram shares the top spot with two others
  • Asian Champions Trophy hockey for women: India thrash Malaysia 4-0
  • Batteries, chains and screws were among 65 objects found in the stomach of a 14-year-old Hathras boy who died after these objects were removed in a complex surgery at Delhi's Safdarjung Hospital
  • India confirms that 'verification patrolling' is on at Demchok and Depsang in Ladakh after disengagement of troops
  • LeT commander and 2 other terrorists killed in Srinagar in a gunbattle with security forces. 4 security personnel injured too.
  • Man arrested in Nagpur for sending hoax emails to the PMO in order to get his book published
  • Adani Power sets a deadline of November 7 for Bangladesh to clear its dues, failing which the company will stop supplying power to the nation
  • Shubman Gill (90) and Rishabh Pant (60) ensure India get a lead in the final Test after which Ashwin and Jadeja reduce the visitors to 171 for 9 in the second innings
  • Final Test versus New Zealand: Match evenly poised as NZ are 143 ahead with 1 wicket in hand
Security forces gun down 10 'armed militants' in Manipur's Jiribam district but locals say those killed were village volunteers and claim that 11, and not 10, were killed
oppn parties
Regulating Social Media Platforms

By Our Editorial Team
First publised on 2022-10-31 09:41:28

About the Author

Sunil Garodia The India Commentary view

The government of India has issued amended rules for social media companies. These ask the platforms to make "reasonable efforts" to prevent information or news that is fake or misleading from being transmitted through their platform. This is a step in the right direction. Traditional media is regulated and such media companies take reasonable steps to prevent dissemination of fake or misleading news. Social media needs to be similarly regulated and must also have a robust self-regulation mechanism. It is not enough for these platforms to argue that they are just allowing user generated content. They need to be held accountable in the same manner as the traditional media for they are following the same advertisement-backed revenue model, without - importantly - the necessary expenditure for gathering news.

Interestingly, despite denials, it has been found that social media platforms create algorithms that favour content that is likely to cause conflicts since it has more chances of going viral. They also indulge in censorship as per their policy. Hence, it is necessary to end the immunity granted to them on the plea of just publishing user generated content because the users are mostly unverified and the content is also from unverified sources and could be part of devious agendas.

In this regard, it should be made mandatory for social media platforms to allow only verified users to post on the platform. The government had told Parliament in March this year that it is not making user verification mandatory for social media platforms as that will raise important questions about matters of privacy and interest of safety and trust. But given the fact that unverified and anonymous users can create unlimited mischief on social media by transmitting fake or misleading news, morphed pictures and videos or abusing others without accountability (yes they can be traced through their IP address but that is in case a complaint in lodged), it is necessary to put a name and picture to go with the chosen nickname of the user. In any case, if someone decides to be part of a democratic public discourse on social media, he or she must stand up for who and what they are instead of pontificating, creating mischief or hurling abuses and threats through faceless accounts.