oppn parties Regulating Social Media Platforms

News Snippets

  • NCLT initiates bankruptcy proceedings against former Videocon chairman Venugopal Dhoot for defaulting on loans of Rs 6158cr as personal guarantor in two group companies
  • LIC approves 1:1 bonus share issue
  • Gold and silver futures also go down by 0.7% and 2.2% respectively
  • Stocks tumbled again on Monday as crude prices rose: Sensex went down by 703 points and Nifty by 207 points
  • Supreme Court refuses to cancel the land-for-jobs FIR against Lalu Prasad
  • The spectre of El Nino haunts India: IMD predicts 'below normal ' monsoon this year
  • Labour protest over increase in wages by 35% (as per Haryana example) turns violent in Noida, nearly 200 were detained by the police
  • Congress leader Sonia Gandhi said that the delimitation exercise must be carried out after the Census is complete
  • PM Modi says Parliament is on the verge of creating history as the Houses get ready to take up the women's reservation bills
  • Tata Sons chairman N Chandrasekaran said that TCS COO Aarthi Subramanian is conducting a thorough inquiry to establish facts and identify individuals involved in the sexual harassment allegations at the company's Nashik office
  • Asha Bhonsle laid to rest with full state honours on Monday in Mumbai
  • AAP leader Arvind Kejriwal once again approached the Delhi HC to request the recusal of a judge from his case
  • Candidates Chess: R Vaishali on the verge of creating history, but needs two wins - one with black pieces - against formidable opponents to emerge as the challenger
  • Rohit Sharma, who retired hurt in the match versus RCB, underwent scans for possible hamstring injury
  • IPL: Abhishek Sharma fails for SRH but Ishan Kishan (91) shines. Then, Vaibhav Sooryavanshi fails for RR and SRH bolwers, especially unheralded Praful Hinge (4 for 24) and Sakib Hussain (4 for 24) win it for SRH. This was the first loss for table-toppers RR
Supreme Court questions Election Commission about SIR SOP and why logical discrepancy was introduced only in Bengal
oppn parties
Regulating Social Media Platforms

By Our Editorial Team
First publised on 2022-10-31 09:41:28

About the Author

Sunil Garodia The India Commentary view

The government of India has issued amended rules for social media companies. These ask the platforms to make "reasonable efforts" to prevent information or news that is fake or misleading from being transmitted through their platform. This is a step in the right direction. Traditional media is regulated and such media companies take reasonable steps to prevent dissemination of fake or misleading news. Social media needs to be similarly regulated and must also have a robust self-regulation mechanism. It is not enough for these platforms to argue that they are just allowing user generated content. They need to be held accountable in the same manner as the traditional media for they are following the same advertisement-backed revenue model, without - importantly - the necessary expenditure for gathering news.

Interestingly, despite denials, it has been found that social media platforms create algorithms that favour content that is likely to cause conflicts since it has more chances of going viral. They also indulge in censorship as per their policy. Hence, it is necessary to end the immunity granted to them on the plea of just publishing user generated content because the users are mostly unverified and the content is also from unverified sources and could be part of devious agendas.

In this regard, it should be made mandatory for social media platforms to allow only verified users to post on the platform. The government had told Parliament in March this year that it is not making user verification mandatory for social media platforms as that will raise important questions about matters of privacy and interest of safety and trust. But given the fact that unverified and anonymous users can create unlimited mischief on social media by transmitting fake or misleading news, morphed pictures and videos or abusing others without accountability (yes they can be traced through their IP address but that is in case a complaint in lodged), it is necessary to put a name and picture to go with the chosen nickname of the user. In any case, if someone decides to be part of a democratic public discourse on social media, he or she must stand up for who and what they are instead of pontificating, creating mischief or hurling abuses and threats through faceless accounts.