oppn parties Risk Perception, Not Paying Capacity, Should Be Considered For Providing Security Cover To Private Citizens

News Snippets

  • Supreme Court rules that functional disability should be the deciding factor in granting road accident damages and not any doctor-issued disability certificate
  • Supreme Court flagged the fact that nearly 56% of the vehicles plying in India were uninsured and asked the government to challan them
  • An Air India flight from Phuket to Delhi encountered severe turbulence and 17 passengers were admitted to hospital with injuries
  • Calcutta HC said that heavens won't fall if Vande Matram is made mandatory to sing in madrasas
  • Kolkata Municipal Corporation has sought government nod for increasing city's wards to 200+ to keep residents in each ward between 16000 to 18000
  • Government has said that partially filled online Census forms may be allowed
  • Government may allow fees on UPI payments above Rs 2000, except on transfer between two individuals
  • Brent crude falls below $80 per barrel
  • Government has increased the LIC offer for sale to Rs 31,400cr with an additional 4% on the block
  • Stock markets become nervous on Tuesday due to Gulf situation: Sensex slides 210 points and Nifty sheds 159 points ahead of RBI MPC meets today
  • Indian cricket team lands in Sri Lanka for a 2-Test series
  • A former French Navy pilot who had alleged that IAF had lost Rafales during Operation Sindoor has been held in France on spying charges
  • An ordinary zari worked living just 100km away from Kolkata was stunned to find Rs 100cr deposited in the bank account. The bank has frozen her account pending enquiry
  • Businessmen in Kolkata gets a Rs 5-crore extortion call, allegedly from the Lawrence Bishnoi gang
  • NTA floats tenders to secure offices and exam materials round-the-clock
Tarun Tejpal, former editor of Tehelka, was sentenced to 10 years in jail by Bombay HC for raping a colleague. This judgment overturns the acquittal by a Goa sessions court
oppn parties
Risk Perception, Not Paying Capacity, Should Be Considered For Providing Security Cover To Private Citizens

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2020-10-28 20:18:27

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Author of Cyber Scams in India, Digital Arrest, The Money Trap and The Human Hack

The Supreme Court has rightly not agreed with the Bombay High Court view that Mumbai police should provide high-level security cover  to anyone who is willing to pay for it. If this was the case, the police would be reduced to being the personal bodyguards of the rich and famous. That, obviously, is not the prime task of the Mumbai, or any other, police force - at best it can be an additional and important task. But if paying capacity was to be the main criterion for providing security cover, then the crime prevention and law enforcing tasks will suffer.

The Supreme Court has rightly said that risk perception should be the main criteria for deciding who deserves to be provided what level of security. That should be the basis of all such decisions. Anyone who is not at a risk from extraneous sources but needs to prevent the public from getting too close for comfort can always deploy his or her own private security, as any rich and famous person worth his salt does nowadays.

Tasking the police, upon payment, to 'protect' private citizens can be disastrous. There is no dearth of people who would be willing to pay to be protected by policemen and if the risk perception is not taken into account, many battalions of the local police forces would be deployed on this 'comfort' duty. Since these duties will not be permanent, it is obvious that the police force will not recruit more personnel but would deploy them from the existing pool. That would mean that they will then get lesser manpower for their regular duty of preventing crime, enforcing the law and protecting the ordinary citizen.

As it is, the police force in all major Indian cities and towns suffers from shortage of personnel. Now, if the existing constables and officers are put on duty to protect those who can pay for their services, the common man will suffer. Risk perception, backed by evidence of threat, must be the only criteria for providing security and periodic review must be done to downgrade or do away with the security cover once the threat perception reduces.