oppn parties Risk Perception, Not Paying Capacity, Should Be Considered For Providing Security Cover To Private Citizens

News Snippets

  • Government to introduce PF for self-emplyed and gig workers
  • Crush at Puri Rathyatra leaves 2 dead and 78 injured
  • NEET-UG, marred in controversy due to pape4r leak, saw a huge increase in top scores as two scored 715/720 and 11.2 lkah candidates cleared the exam
  • India's first hydrogen-powered train will be flagged off by PM Modi from Jind in Haryana
  • Delhi HC asks the government to monitor Sona Wnagchuk's health regularly
  • TMC Rajya Sabha MP Koel Mallick resigns from her seat, leaves TMC. Mamata asks all those wishing to leave the party to do so before July 21
  • Calcutta HC says land deed is not a proof of citizenship. Refuses to provide protection to a man facing deportation on basis of land deed
  • Supreme Court tells the government to teach the third language in the 3-language formula in Class 6 and not Class 9
  • Government to take steps to boost liquidity for small businesses
  • RBI says that banks cannot sell seized assets back to the defaulters
  • Centre decides to take equity stakes in semiconductor startups
  • Markets remain flat on Thursday: Sensex closes just 1 point ahead and Nifty ended 5 point lower
  • BCCI:Selectors have possibly decided that Rohit Sharma will not be selected for ODIs after the Lord's game on Sunday
  • Japan Open badminton: P V Sindhu stuns world no. 5 Han Yue of China 21-16, 21-14 to enter the quarterfinals
  • 2nd ODI versus England: Indian batting fails miserably except Gill, Kohli and Iyer to score just 233 all out. England win by 4 wickets
Supreme Court clarifies that it has not issued a blanket ban on use of bulldozers, and they can be used after compliance with procedure laid down in civil laws
oppn parties
Risk Perception, Not Paying Capacity, Should Be Considered For Providing Security Cover To Private Citizens

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2020-10-28 20:18:27

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Author of Cyber Scams in India, Digital Arrest, The Money Trap and The Human Hack

The Supreme Court has rightly not agreed with the Bombay High Court view that Mumbai police should provide high-level security cover  to anyone who is willing to pay for it. If this was the case, the police would be reduced to being the personal bodyguards of the rich and famous. That, obviously, is not the prime task of the Mumbai, or any other, police force - at best it can be an additional and important task. But if paying capacity was to be the main criterion for providing security cover, then the crime prevention and law enforcing tasks will suffer.

The Supreme Court has rightly said that risk perception should be the main criteria for deciding who deserves to be provided what level of security. That should be the basis of all such decisions. Anyone who is not at a risk from extraneous sources but needs to prevent the public from getting too close for comfort can always deploy his or her own private security, as any rich and famous person worth his salt does nowadays.

Tasking the police, upon payment, to 'protect' private citizens can be disastrous. There is no dearth of people who would be willing to pay to be protected by policemen and if the risk perception is not taken into account, many battalions of the local police forces would be deployed on this 'comfort' duty. Since these duties will not be permanent, it is obvious that the police force will not recruit more personnel but would deploy them from the existing pool. That would mean that they will then get lesser manpower for their regular duty of preventing crime, enforcing the law and protecting the ordinary citizen.

As it is, the police force in all major Indian cities and towns suffers from shortage of personnel. Now, if the existing constables and officers are put on duty to protect those who can pay for their services, the common man will suffer. Risk perception, backed by evidence of threat, must be the only criteria for providing security and periodic review must be done to downgrade or do away with the security cover once the threat perception reduces.