oppn parties SC On Kashmir: Indefinite Suspension Of Internet Is Not Permissible, Periodic Review Mandatory

News Snippets

  • PM Modi tells BJP workers that India is in for a long battle against the coronavirus and there is no scope to feel tired or defeated
  • PM Modi asks ministers to focus on exports and new areas and sectors
  • PM Modi asks ministers to prepare business continuity plan post the lifting of the lockdown
  • Corona cases in India cross 4000 and the death toll stands at 124
  • The government decides to double the testing of corona suspects from 10000 now to 20000 in the next three days
  • Flipkart assures employees that there will be no job or salary cuts due to the COVID-19 pandemic
  • Although it was obvious, but the government still clarifies that there is no need to switch off appliances and only lights need to be switched off on April 5 at 9pm after confusion in the minds of some people
  • PM Modi and President Trump decide "to deploy full strength of (Indo-US) partnership" to fight against COVID-19
  • 17 states have reported 1023 cases of coronavirus linked to the Tablighi Jamaat, which translates to 30% of all positive cases in India
  • The government says people should not use alcohol-based hand sanitizers before lighting diyas or candles on April 5
  • The railways say there is no certainty yet when services will resume after the lockdown and a final decision will be taken in the next few days
  • As coronavirus cases multiply in Assam, six north-east states seal their borders with the state
  • Power System Operation Corporation Ltd. (POCOSO) putting all systems and protocols in place at war-footing to ensure there is no grid failure due to reduction in demand on April 5 at 9 pm
  • Power ministry scotches rumours that the power grid might fail due to the 9-minute blackout called by PM Modi on Sunday, April 5
  • Centre asks people to wear home-made masks if it is absolutely essential for them to step out of homes
26 nurses and 3 doctors test positive for COVID-19 at Wockhardt Hospital in Mumbai, facility cordoned off, no entry or exit permitted from the hospital
oppn parties
SC On Kashmir: Indefinite Suspension Of Internet Is Not Permissible, Periodic Review Mandatory

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2020-01-10 21:03:54

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Writes for a number of publications.

The Supreme Court has asked the Jammu & Kashmir administration to review all curbs that were placed in the state within a week. Calling the use of internet services for freedom of speech and trade and commerce a fundamental right under Articles 19(1)(a) and 19(1)(g), the court said that continued suspension of the same was neither permissible nor desirable. The court also said that any restriction on such a right can be placed if it is in "consonance with the mandate under Article 19 (2) and (6) of the Constitution, inclusive of the test of proportionality (para 152(b))".

But it should be noted that nowhere in its order did the court say that the restrictions were unconstitutional or the government acted in a highhanded manner. Nor did it say that access to the internet was a fundamental right. The court just explained that the suspension of such services can always be done under the Temporary Suspension of Telecom Services (Public Emergency or Public Safety) Rules 2017 in the case of "public emergency" and "in the interests of public safety".

However, the court said that an indefinite suspension of internet services was not permissible under the Suspension Rules. There has to be a periodic review and if the government deems fit to continue with the suspension for a further period, it must comply with the provisions of the said rules. It directed the administration to review the curbs within a week and then decide if restriction needed to be extended. The court also said that if the period of restriction was to be extended further, it should be done as per the conditions laid down in this order. It, however, asked the administration to restore the internet in the state for government websites, localized banking services, hospitals and other essential services.

As the court commented that its concern was limited to "find a balance regarding security and liberty of people", this order did a fine balancing act of reminding the government that it did not have the power to keep the restrictions in place without a periodic review without delving into the political intent behind the orders. The order for reviewing the situation and acting accordingly was in keeping with the law.

But has not the government done exactly that? It has periodically reviewed the situation and lifted restrictions in phases by allowing fixed-line telephony, mobile services (without SMS and internet) and relaxation of curfew and withdrawal of Sec 144 from most areas of the state. It later restored SMS services too. It will now either extend the restriction on internet services or allow them after reviewing the situation.

It must be noted that the court has clearly said that expression of dissent or disagreement with a government policy or decision cannot be a reason for internet suspension. It also said that the decision to suspend the internet is open to judicial review and any government order suspending the same must give detailed reasons for doing so to enable aggrieved persons to challenge the order.