oppn parties Section 66A Of The IT Act Still Lives In India's Thanas

News Snippets

  • Allahabad HC said that the UP Police is acting as law unto themselves as they detained a person unlawfully even before his arrest
  • Kolkata witnesses traffic snarls on the first day of the Durga Puja festival as revellers start pnadal-hopping
  • Neha Bora was subsequently released and Dipke is to appear before a magistrate today at noon
  • Delhi Police detained Cockroach Janta Party founder Abhijeet Dipke, Neha Bora of AISA, student leaders and supporters ahead of a rally in Connaught Place demanding Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar's resignation. The protest followed the detention and jailing of two CJP leaders earlier in the week over demonstrations at Jantar Mantar
  • The Reserve Bank of India is considering further monetary tightening to counter capital outflows and increase the cost of betting against the rupee, according to bankers and analysts cited by Reuters. The measures follow recent rate increases and steps to drain liquidity as pressure on the currency and inflation concerns persist
  • India directed oil marketing companies to stop diverting sugar-based feedstocks for ethanol production in the 2026–27 supply year, according to a new tender issued on Friday. The companies have invited bids for 11 billion litres of ethanol made from alternatives including corn and broken rice, amid concerns about domestic sugar supplies and prices
  • Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman said India's trade imbalance with China was growing sharply and attributed the problem partly to restrictions on Indian goods and services entering the Chinese market. China subsequently said it was ready to work with India to address mutual economic and trade concerns; India's trade deficit with China reached $69 billion in the first half of FY2026–27, up 27% year-on-year
  • Indian equity benchmarks extended their recovery on Friday, with the Sensex rising 413.66 points to close at 74,729.27 and the Nifty 50 gaining 148.80 points to settle at 23,146.15. Information technology shares, including Tech Mahindra, Infosys and TCS, helped lift the indices
  • India defeated Zimbabwe by four wickets in the opening women's T20 International in Raipur, taking a 1–0 lead in the three-match series. Deepti Sharma and Niki Prasad combined in an 82-run stand after India's top order collapsed, helping the hosts chase down Zimbabwe's total of 114 for five
  • Indian wrestler Komal won bronze in the women's 59 kg category at the Under-23 World Wrestling Championships in Las Vegas, defeating Kazakhstan's Viktoriia Khusainova 7–2. Fellow Indian Amruta Pujari advanced to the women's 72 kg final after recording two pinfall victories
  • Indian shuttler Jagsher Singh Khangurra secured a bronze medal at the BWF World Junior Badminton Championships in Cairo
  • The Supreme Court of India upheld the Bombay High Court's decision quashing the 2020 write-off of ₹8,415 crore in additional tier-1 bonds issued by Yes Bank (Yes Bank). The court ruled that the bank's administrator lacked the authority to extinguish the bonds under the final reconstruction scheme, strengthening bondholders' claims
  • The Supreme Court issued notices to the Election Commission of India, Delhi Police and opposition leaders, including Rahul Gandhi and Akhilesh Yadav, in separate petitions concerning electoral-roll revision and protests held in Delhi on October 10–12. The court also directed the preservation of CCTV footage linked to allegations of police excesses
  • The Supreme Court ruled that a person converting from Hinduism to Islam cannot automatically claim backward-class reservation benefits in the new religious community solely on the basis of their previous caste status. The judgment upheld the Madras High Court's decision striking down a 2024 Tamil Nadu government order that permitted such certification for specified communities
  • The Election Commission of India ordered a Special Summary Revision of electoral rolls in 14 states and three Union Territories, using January 1, 2027, as the qualifying date for voter eligibility. The draft rolls are scheduled for publication on November 12, claims and objections will be accepted until December 11, and the final rolls are due on January 4, 2027
Delhi HC refuses to ban CJP's Tiranga rally at Central Park in Connaught Place today /////// Police says will control and regulate it /////// NDMC closes the park for the public on Friday and Saturday
oppn parties
Section 66A Of The IT Act Still Lives In India's Thanas

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2021-07-05 10:44:33

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Author of Cyber Scams in India, Digital Arrest, The Money Trap and The Human Hack

When senior advocate Sanjay Parikh, appearing for petitioner People's Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) brought to the notice of the Supreme Court that cases were still being filed under Section 66A of the IT Act which was scrapped by the apex court as far back as 2015, the court was shocked.

The bench of Justices R K Nariman, K M Joseph and B R Gavai said that "it is shocking, distressing and amazing that police across the country are still registering cases under Section 66A of the Information Technology Act". It was brought to the court's notice that when the section was scrapped, there were only 687 cases filed under it. These had jumped to 1307 cases now.

Attorney-General K K Venugopal said that since the section was still on the books with a small footnote that it has been scrapped by the Supreme Court, it is possible that the police did not look at the footnote. But this is no excuse. Once a section is scrapped, if a case is lodged under it and summons is issued, the defence lawyer will point out the mistake. Some of these cases will reach the courts. The judges will throw them out. Then how do so many cases are being lodged and still exist in the system?

The section was widely misused by the police at the bidding of their political masters to arrest persons who posted critical comments or posts (even forwarded cartoons) on social media. The section was so ambiguous; it became a potent tool in the hands of the administration to harass unsuspecting individuals.  It seems that it is still being used for the same reason. The Supreme Court has issued a notice to the Centre and has assured that "we will do something."

First of all, the court must direct the government that all acts published after changes in law due to court orders must not contain the scrapped section but instead just the section number and the sentence that "this section has been scrapped by the Supreme Court" in bold and not as a footnote. It is understandable if cases are inadvertently lodged under scrapped sections for a couple of months, but 6 years is a long time. This has to stop.