oppn parties Section 66A Of The IT Act Still Lives In India's Thanas

News Snippets

  • For the first time ever, Mukesh Ambani buys a 29% stake in Gautam Adani's Mahan Energen, a subsidiary of Adani Power to source 500MW of electricity from the company's power plant in MP
  • Stocks continue to rise on Thursday - Sensex gains 639 points to 73635 and Nifty 203 points to 22326
  • Golf - Indian Open: 3 Indians at tied 14th as Joost Luiten takes the lead with a wonderful 7-under 65
  • IPL: RR beat DC by 12 runs as Riyan Parag (84 off just 45 balls) shines
  • SP drops two candidates owing allegiance to Azam Khan from Rampur and Moradabad
  • In Assam, a controversy erupted after a picture of UPPL leader Benjamin Basumatary, lying on a stack of Rs 500 notes circulated on social media. UPPL is an ally of the BJP
  • AAP's Jalandhar-West MP Sushil Kumar Rinku joins the BJP. He was the only AAP Lok Sabha MP
  • Supreme Court dismisses Centre's plea to review its 2023 verdict in the PMLA case
  • Close save for passengers as they remain unhurt after the wings of two planes graze at Kolkata airport. Pilots derostered and inquiry ordered by DGCA
  • Bengal BJP leader Dilip Ghosh gets notice from the EC as well as the BJP for making ugly remarks about Mamata Banerjee's parentage
  • Sadanand Vasanth Date, who faught terrorists in the 26/11 attack and was awarded the Preisent's Police medal, has been appointed the head of the NIA
  • Centre will borrow Rs 7.5L cr in the first six months of FY25, nearly 50% of the target for the full year
  • 25 stocks, including SBI, will see same day trade settlements from today in the world's fastest settlement mode in both BSE and NSE
  • Stocks recover smartly on Wednesday: Sensex rises 526 points to 72996 and Nifty 118 points to 22123
  • Tennis: Rohan Bopanna-Matthew Ebden reached the semifinals of the Miami Open
Delhi Lt Governor Vinai Kumar Saxena says government cannot be run from jail, hints at President's Rule in the capital ////// In a dangerous incident, the wings of two planes grazed while taxiing on the runway at Kolkata airport, all passengers were safe but DGCA ordered an inquiry and the pilots were derostered
oppn parties
Section 66A Of The IT Act Still Lives In India's Thanas

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2021-07-05 10:44:33

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator.

When senior advocate Sanjay Parikh, appearing for petitioner People's Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) brought to the notice of the Supreme Court that cases were still being filed under Section 66A of the IT Act which was scrapped by the apex court as far back as 2015, the court was shocked.

The bench of Justices R K Nariman, K M Joseph and B R Gavai said that "it is shocking, distressing and amazing that police across the country are still registering cases under Section 66A of the Information Technology Act". It was brought to the court's notice that when the section was scrapped, there were only 687 cases filed under it. These had jumped to 1307 cases now.

Attorney-General K K Venugopal said that since the section was still on the books with a small footnote that it has been scrapped by the Supreme Court, it is possible that the police did not look at the footnote. But this is no excuse. Once a section is scrapped, if a case is lodged under it and summons is issued, the defence lawyer will point out the mistake. Some of these cases will reach the courts. The judges will throw them out. Then how do so many cases are being lodged and still exist in the system?

The section was widely misused by the police at the bidding of their political masters to arrest persons who posted critical comments or posts (even forwarded cartoons) on social media. The section was so ambiguous; it became a potent tool in the hands of the administration to harass unsuspecting individuals.  It seems that it is still being used for the same reason. The Supreme Court has issued a notice to the Centre and has assured that "we will do something."

First of all, the court must direct the government that all acts published after changes in law due to court orders must not contain the scrapped section but instead just the section number and the sentence that "this section has been scrapped by the Supreme Court" in bold and not as a footnote. It is understandable if cases are inadvertently lodged under scrapped sections for a couple of months, but 6 years is a long time. This has to stop.