oppn parties Setback For Thackeray Group: SC Refuses Interim Stay Against EC Order

News Snippets

  • Coal exploration plan worth Rs 2980cr cleared by Union cabinet
  • Government ploughs in Rs 89000cr in BSNL for 4G, 5G spectrum operations
  • Stocks gain on Wednesday: Sensex adds 350 points to 63142 and Nifty 127 points to 18726
  • Wresters agitation: Sports minister assures action by June 15, wrestlers put off agitation till then
  • WTC Final: India lose the plot after putting Australia to bat as Steve Smith stands like a rock and Travis Head counter attacks to put Australia (327 for 3) in command on the first day
  • Wrestlers agitation: Bajrang Punia. Sakshi Mallik and Vinesh Phogat rejoin work in Railways, BKU pulls back but wrestlers say agitation will go on
  • UP bahubali-turned-politician gets life in 32-year-old murder case
  • India-US seal defence cooperation roadmap as Defence minister Rajnath Singh meets US Defence Secretary Lloyd Austin
  • CBI probe in the train mishap will look at error in interlocking system and probe the sabotage angle
  • Violence continues in Manipur as three persons were killed after a mob attacked an ambulance in Imphal West district
  • Karnataka cabinet is likely to discuss cow slaugther law in its next meeting
  • Rahul Gandhi woos diaspora in the US, tries to show the fight in India as between those who believe in Mahatma Gandhi and those in Nathuram Godse
  • In preparation of a shutdown, MTNL moving operations to BSNL
  • Services sector sustains growth although Services PMI slips from 62 in April to 61.2 in May
  • Stocks gain handsomely on Monday: Sensex rises 240 points to 62787 and Nifty 59 points to 18593
WTC Final: Australia take firm grip on Day1 - Travis Head (146 batting) and Steve Smith (95 batting) take them to 327 for 3 as Indian bowling falters
oppn parties
Setback For Thackeray Group: SC Refuses Interim Stay Against EC Order

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2023-02-23 07:50:52

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator.

The Supreme Court has refused to grant an interim stay to the Uddhav Thackeray group of the Shiv Sena against the Election Commission (EC) order giving the party name and symbol to the Eknath Shinde group and, for all practical purposes, recognizing it as the 'real' Shiv Sena. The court said that it was not in favour of giving a stay without hearing the other side. Accordingly, the court issued a notice to the Shinde group to file their response within 15 days and a week’s time thereafter to the Thackeray group to submit a rejoinder before it would hear the case again.

There was an intense legal tussle during the hearing for the stay. Lawyers representing the Thackeray group raised two matters which they said would put the Thackeray group at a disadvantage if the stay was not granted. Firstly, they said that if the Shinde group was not restrained, they would take over all assets and bank accounts of the party citing the EC order which recognized it as the 'real' Shiv sena for all practical purposes. Then, they said that the Shinde group could also take steps to disqualify the MLAs of the Thackeray group on the strength of the EC order.

But the court refused to grant any relief on both the points raised. The court said that since the EC order just awarded the party name and symbol to the Shinde group, it did not expressly give it any right to claim assets and bank accounts, the point raised cannot be taken up in the plea for the stay as it did was not in the EC order.

For the point about disqualification, the court was satisfied by the answer given by the Shinde group that there was an understanding between the two groups that matters will not be precipitated until the courts decided the earlier disqualification matter. The Shinde group categorically said that it had no plans to issue new disqualification notices to the MLAs of the Thackeray group on the basis of the EC order. Hence, the court chose not to grant any relief to the Thackeray group on this point too.

While it is true that the Shinde group has started taking over some offices and other assets of the Shiv Sena claiming to be the ‘real’ party after the EC order, it is also true that until the Supreme Court decides the matter of the legality of the EC order, all such machinations by the Shinde group are temporary. If the Supreme Court holds the EC order faulty or illegal and decides in favour of the Thackeray group, all acquisitions by the Shinde group will be null and void. Hence, the Thackeray group will have to wait till hearings are completed on its plea challenging the EC order.