oppn parties Should Reservations Be In Place For Ever?

News Snippets

  • Government to introduce PF for self-emplyed and gig workers
  • Crush at Puri Rathyatra leaves 2 dead and 78 injured
  • NEET-UG, marred in controversy due to pape4r leak, saw a huge increase in top scores as two scored 715/720 and 11.2 lkah candidates cleared the exam
  • India's first hydrogen-powered train will be flagged off by PM Modi from Jind in Haryana
  • Delhi HC asks the government to monitor Sona Wnagchuk's health regularly
  • TMC Rajya Sabha MP Koel Mallick resigns from her seat, leaves TMC. Mamata asks all those wishing to leave the party to do so before July 21
  • Calcutta HC says land deed is not a proof of citizenship. Refuses to provide protection to a man facing deportation on basis of land deed
  • Supreme Court tells the government to teach the third language in the 3-language formula in Class 6 and not Class 9
  • Government to take steps to boost liquidity for small businesses
  • RBI says that banks cannot sell seized assets back to the defaulters
  • Centre decides to take equity stakes in semiconductor startups
  • Markets remain flat on Thursday: Sensex closes just 1 point ahead and Nifty ended 5 point lower
  • BCCI:Selectors have possibly decided that Rohit Sharma will not be selected for ODIs after the Lord's game on Sunday
  • Japan Open badminton: P V Sindhu stuns world no. 5 Han Yue of China 21-16, 21-14 to enter the quarterfinals
  • 2nd ODI versus England: Indian batting fails miserably except Gill, Kohli and Iyer to score just 233 all out. England win by 4 wickets
Supreme Court clarifies that it has not issued a blanket ban on use of bulldozers, and they can be used after compliance with procedure laid down in civil laws
oppn parties
Should Reservations Be In Place For Ever?

By Our Editorial Team
First publised on 2022-11-08 07:35:23

About the Author

Sunil Garodia The India Commentary view

While upholding the 103rd amendment to the Indian Constitution which provided for 10% quotas in education and jobs for the economically weaker sections among the general category of citizens with a split (3-2) verdict, two judges on the bench advised the government to revisit the entire reservation scenario and do away with quotas within a given time frame. This is welcome. What started as affirmative action (which the framers of the Constitution wanted to run for just 10 years) is now being treated as a life-long right.

No affirmative action can go on indefinitely, as the Supreme Court rightly pointed out. If it needs to run for an inordinately extended period of time it means that something is wrong with the entire process and it is not achieving the ends for which it was started. Caste-based affirmative action in India was started to correct the historical injustice meted out to marginalized castes who were treated as untouchables and left to fend for themselves. It was necessary to include that vast mass of population in a free, democratic India that promised inclusive development for all its citizens.

But the results of 75 years of affirmative action are not along expected lines. There still exists a huge mass of marginalized castes that have not benefitted from quotas in jobs and education mainly because such quotas have been cornered by a select and privileged class among them. Hence, in India, merit suffers just because 10% of the backward classes who have the awareness, means and political privilege to enjoy the benefits of reservation and who, in tandem with the political class, manage to dupe the rest 90% into believing that they too enjoy the same benefits, have hijacked the system. It is time for the government to revisit the entire quota system and make the necessary corrections to ensure that the benefits percolate to the lowest level. A time limit must also be set to do away with the quota system.