oppn parties Should Reservations Be In Place For Ever?

News Snippets

  • R G Kar rape-murder hearing start in Kolkata's Sealdah court on Monday
  • Calcutta HC rules that a person cannot be indicted for consensual sex after promise of marriage even if he reneges on that promise later
  • Cryptocurrencies jump after Trump's win, Bitcoin goes past $84K while Dogecoin jumps 50%
  • Vistara merges with Air India today
  • GST Council to decide on zero tax on term plans and select health covers in its Dec 21-22 meeting
  • SIP inflows stood at a record Rs 25323cr in October
  • Chess: Chennai GM tournament - Aravindh Chithambaram shares the top spot with two others
  • Asian Champions Trophy hockey for women: India thrash Malaysia 4-0
  • Batteries, chains and screws were among 65 objects found in the stomach of a 14-year-old Hathras boy who died after these objects were removed in a complex surgery at Delhi's Safdarjung Hospital
  • India confirms that 'verification patrolling' is on at Demchok and Depsang in Ladakh after disengagement of troops
  • LeT commander and 2 other terrorists killed in Srinagar in a gunbattle with security forces. 4 security personnel injured too.
  • Man arrested in Nagpur for sending hoax emails to the PMO in order to get his book published
  • Adani Power sets a deadline of November 7 for Bangladesh to clear its dues, failing which the company will stop supplying power to the nation
  • Shubman Gill (90) and Rishabh Pant (60) ensure India get a lead in the final Test after which Ashwin and Jadeja reduce the visitors to 171 for 9 in the second innings
  • Final Test versus New Zealand: Match evenly poised as NZ are 143 ahead with 1 wicket in hand
Security forces gun down 10 'armed militants' in Manipur's Jiribam district but locals say those killed were village volunteers and claim that 11, and not 10, were killed
oppn parties
Should Reservations Be In Place For Ever?

By Our Editorial Team
First publised on 2022-11-08 07:35:23

About the Author

Sunil Garodia The India Commentary view

While upholding the 103rd amendment to the Indian Constitution which provided for 10% quotas in education and jobs for the economically weaker sections among the general category of citizens with a split (3-2) verdict, two judges on the bench advised the government to revisit the entire reservation scenario and do away with quotas within a given time frame. This is welcome. What started as affirmative action (which the framers of the Constitution wanted to run for just 10 years) is now being treated as a life-long right.

No affirmative action can go on indefinitely, as the Supreme Court rightly pointed out. If it needs to run for an inordinately extended period of time it means that something is wrong with the entire process and it is not achieving the ends for which it was started. Caste-based affirmative action in India was started to correct the historical injustice meted out to marginalized castes who were treated as untouchables and left to fend for themselves. It was necessary to include that vast mass of population in a free, democratic India that promised inclusive development for all its citizens.

But the results of 75 years of affirmative action are not along expected lines. There still exists a huge mass of marginalized castes that have not benefitted from quotas in jobs and education mainly because such quotas have been cornered by a select and privileged class among them. Hence, in India, merit suffers just because 10% of the backward classes who have the awareness, means and political privilege to enjoy the benefits of reservation and who, in tandem with the political class, manage to dupe the rest 90% into believing that they too enjoy the same benefits, have hijacked the system. It is time for the government to revisit the entire quota system and make the necessary corrections to ensure that the benefits percolate to the lowest level. A time limit must also be set to do away with the quota system.