oppn parties State Vigilantism Must Be Stopped

News Snippets

  • Sikh extremists attacked a cinema hall in London that was playing Kangana Ranaut's controversial film 'Emergency'
  • A Delhi court directed the investigating agencies to senstize officers to collect nail clippings, fingernail scrappings or finger swab in order to get DNA profile as direct evidence of sexual attack is often not present and might result in an offender going scot free
  • Uniform Civil Code rules cleared by state cabinet, likely to be implemented in the next 10 days
  • Supreme Court reiterates that there is no point in arresting the accused after the chargesheet has been filed and the investigation is complete
  • Kolkata court sentences Sanjoy Roy, the sole accused in the R G Kar rape-murder case, to life term. West Bengal government and CBI to appeal in HC for the death penalty
  • Supreme Court stays criminal defamation case against Rahul Gandhi for his remarks against home minister Amit Shah in Jharkhand during the AICC plenary session
  • Government reviews import basket to align it with the policies of the Trump administration
  • NCLT orders liquidation of GoAir airlines
  • Archery - Indian archers bagged 2 silver in Nimes Archery tournament in France
  • Stocks make impressive gain on Monday - Sensex adds 454 points to 77073 and Nifty 141 points to 23344
  • D Gukesh draws with Fabiano Caruana in the Tata Steel chess tournament in the Netherlands
  • Women's U-19 T20 WC - In a stunning game, debutants Nigeria beat New Zealand by 2 runs
  • Rohit Sharma to play under Ajinkye Rahane in Mumbai's Ranji match against J&K
  • Virat Kohli to play in Delhi's last group Ranji trophy match against Saurashtra. This will be his first Ranji match in 12 years
  • The toll in the Rajouri mystery illness case rose to 17 even as the Centre sent a team to study the situation
Calling the case not 'rarest of rare', a court in Kolkata sentenced Sanjay Roy, the only accused in the R G Kar rape-murder case to life in prison until death
oppn parties
State Vigilantism Must Be Stopped

By Our Editorial Team
First publised on 2022-06-14 08:51:50

About the Author

Sunil Garodia The India Commentary view

It is surprising that in a democratic country that has a plethora of laws, professes to treat all citizens equally and gives the impression of following the rule of law , the law is being flouted and citizens are being punished just on the assumption of their involvement in a crime without the state feeling the need for following due process. The property of those alleged to be involved in stone pelting, rioting or any other form of protest are being razed with bulldozers without them being proven guilty of the crime in any court of law or without them being given time to respond to the charges against them or defend themselves as per law. This kind of state vigilantism is dangerous and disturbing as it shows that the country is being governed with a vicious agenda that seeks to treat some citizens as less equal and that state becomes the judge, jury and executioner. What is even more surprising and disturbing is that despite several pleas being filed in courts, the judiciary is not treating the matter with the urgency it deserves and in the process, giving a free run to the state to indulge in such highhanded and blatantly illegal action.

This selective and unconstitutional use of force by the state needs to be stopped. Since it is clear that the state governments (the list is growing with UP, Madhya Pradesh, Gujarat, Assam and Tripura and the civic authorities in Delhi already guilty of such highhandedness) are not going to stop this by themselves and have in fact been emboldened by the lack of urgent response from the judiciary, it is upon the judiciary to intervene and protect the rights of the citizen. The very fact that action is being taken by the state without following due process should have prodded the Supreme Court to take suo motu action. Instead, the Supreme Court, the MP High Court and the Allahabad High Court are sitting on petitions from aggrieved citizens asking for relief in the matter. The injustice of such action is clear when one finds that the house that was demolished in Prayagraj belonged to the wife of the alleged accused. So now the state is saying that all relatives of an accused will be punished for his or her alleged action which has not been proven in a court of law. This absurd, illegal and extra-constitutional behaviour of the state must be stopped and the courts must intervene speedily.