oppn parties State Vigilantism Must Be Stopped

News Snippets

  • Government to introduce PF for self-emplyed and gig workers
  • Crush at Puri Rathyatra leaves 2 dead and 78 injured
  • NEET-UG, marred in controversy due to pape4r leak, saw a huge increase in top scores as two scored 715/720 and 11.2 lkah candidates cleared the exam
  • India's first hydrogen-powered train will be flagged off by PM Modi from Jind in Haryana
  • Delhi HC asks the government to monitor Sona Wnagchuk's health regularly
  • TMC Rajya Sabha MP Koel Mallick resigns from her seat, leaves TMC. Mamata asks all those wishing to leave the party to do so before July 21
  • Calcutta HC says land deed is not a proof of citizenship. Refuses to provide protection to a man facing deportation on basis of land deed
  • Supreme Court tells the government to teach the third language in the 3-language formula in Class 6 and not Class 9
  • Government to take steps to boost liquidity for small businesses
  • RBI says that banks cannot sell seized assets back to the defaulters
  • Centre decides to take equity stakes in semiconductor startups
  • Markets remain flat on Thursday: Sensex closes just 1 point ahead and Nifty ended 5 point lower
  • BCCI:Selectors have possibly decided that Rohit Sharma will not be selected for ODIs after the Lord's game on Sunday
  • Japan Open badminton: P V Sindhu stuns world no. 5 Han Yue of China 21-16, 21-14 to enter the quarterfinals
  • 2nd ODI versus England: Indian batting fails miserably except Gill, Kohli and Iyer to score just 233 all out. England win by 4 wickets
Supreme Court clarifies that it has not issued a blanket ban on use of bulldozers, and they can be used after compliance with procedure laid down in civil laws
oppn parties
State Vigilantism Must Be Stopped

By Our Editorial Team
First publised on 2022-06-14 08:51:50

About the Author

Sunil Garodia The India Commentary view

It is surprising that in a democratic country that has a plethora of laws, professes to treat all citizens equally and gives the impression of following the rule of law , the law is being flouted and citizens are being punished just on the assumption of their involvement in a crime without the state feeling the need for following due process. The property of those alleged to be involved in stone pelting, rioting or any other form of protest are being razed with bulldozers without them being proven guilty of the crime in any court of law or without them being given time to respond to the charges against them or defend themselves as per law. This kind of state vigilantism is dangerous and disturbing as it shows that the country is being governed with a vicious agenda that seeks to treat some citizens as less equal and that state becomes the judge, jury and executioner. What is even more surprising and disturbing is that despite several pleas being filed in courts, the judiciary is not treating the matter with the urgency it deserves and in the process, giving a free run to the state to indulge in such highhanded and blatantly illegal action.

This selective and unconstitutional use of force by the state needs to be stopped. Since it is clear that the state governments (the list is growing with UP, Madhya Pradesh, Gujarat, Assam and Tripura and the civic authorities in Delhi already guilty of such highhandedness) are not going to stop this by themselves and have in fact been emboldened by the lack of urgent response from the judiciary, it is upon the judiciary to intervene and protect the rights of the citizen. The very fact that action is being taken by the state without following due process should have prodded the Supreme Court to take suo motu action. Instead, the Supreme Court, the MP High Court and the Allahabad High Court are sitting on petitions from aggrieved citizens asking for relief in the matter. The injustice of such action is clear when one finds that the house that was demolished in Prayagraj belonged to the wife of the alleged accused. So now the state is saying that all relatives of an accused will be punished for his or her alleged action which has not been proven in a court of law. This absurd, illegal and extra-constitutional behaviour of the state must be stopped and the courts must intervene speedily.