oppn parties State Vigilantism Must Be Stopped

News Snippets

  • NCLT initiates bankruptcy proceedings against former Videocon chairman Venugopal Dhoot for defaulting on loans of Rs 6158cr as personal guarantor in two group companies
  • LIC approves 1:1 bonus share issue
  • Gold and silver futures also go down by 0.7% and 2.2% respectively
  • Stocks tumbled again on Monday as crude prices rose: Sensex went down by 703 points and Nifty by 207 points
  • Supreme Court refuses to cancel the land-for-jobs FIR against Lalu Prasad
  • The spectre of El Nino haunts India: IMD predicts 'below normal ' monsoon this year
  • Labour protest over increase in wages by 35% (as per Haryana example) turns violent in Noida, nearly 200 were detained by the police
  • Congress leader Sonia Gandhi said that the delimitation exercise must be carried out after the Census is complete
  • PM Modi says Parliament is on the verge of creating history as the Houses get ready to take up the women's reservation bills
  • Tata Sons chairman N Chandrasekaran said that TCS COO Aarthi Subramanian is conducting a thorough inquiry to establish facts and identify individuals involved in the sexual harassment allegations at the company's Nashik office
  • Asha Bhonsle laid to rest with full state honours on Monday in Mumbai
  • AAP leader Arvind Kejriwal once again approached the Delhi HC to request the recusal of a judge from his case
  • Candidates Chess: R Vaishali on the verge of creating history, but needs two wins - one with black pieces - against formidable opponents to emerge as the challenger
  • Rohit Sharma, who retired hurt in the match versus RCB, underwent scans for possible hamstring injury
  • IPL: Abhishek Sharma fails for SRH but Ishan Kishan (91) shines. Then, Vaibhav Sooryavanshi fails for RR and SRH bolwers, especially unheralded Praful Hinge (4 for 24) and Sakib Hussain (4 for 24) win it for SRH. This was the first loss for table-toppers RR
Supreme Court questions Election Commission about SIR SOP and why logical discrepancy was introduced only in Bengal
oppn parties
State Vigilantism Must Be Stopped

By Our Editorial Team
First publised on 2022-06-14 08:51:50

About the Author

Sunil Garodia The India Commentary view

It is surprising that in a democratic country that has a plethora of laws, professes to treat all citizens equally and gives the impression of following the rule of law , the law is being flouted and citizens are being punished just on the assumption of their involvement in a crime without the state feeling the need for following due process. The property of those alleged to be involved in stone pelting, rioting or any other form of protest are being razed with bulldozers without them being proven guilty of the crime in any court of law or without them being given time to respond to the charges against them or defend themselves as per law. This kind of state vigilantism is dangerous and disturbing as it shows that the country is being governed with a vicious agenda that seeks to treat some citizens as less equal and that state becomes the judge, jury and executioner. What is even more surprising and disturbing is that despite several pleas being filed in courts, the judiciary is not treating the matter with the urgency it deserves and in the process, giving a free run to the state to indulge in such highhanded and blatantly illegal action.

This selective and unconstitutional use of force by the state needs to be stopped. Since it is clear that the state governments (the list is growing with UP, Madhya Pradesh, Gujarat, Assam and Tripura and the civic authorities in Delhi already guilty of such highhandedness) are not going to stop this by themselves and have in fact been emboldened by the lack of urgent response from the judiciary, it is upon the judiciary to intervene and protect the rights of the citizen. The very fact that action is being taken by the state without following due process should have prodded the Supreme Court to take suo motu action. Instead, the Supreme Court, the MP High Court and the Allahabad High Court are sitting on petitions from aggrieved citizens asking for relief in the matter. The injustice of such action is clear when one finds that the house that was demolished in Prayagraj belonged to the wife of the alleged accused. So now the state is saying that all relatives of an accused will be punished for his or her alleged action which has not been proven in a court of law. This absurd, illegal and extra-constitutional behaviour of the state must be stopped and the courts must intervene speedily.