By Our Editorial Team
First publised on 2025-08-27 00:26:02
The sharp reactions to the Supreme Court's August 11 directive ordering the relocation of all stray dogs in Delhi-NCR to shelters exposed how divided public opinion on this matter truly is. Its revised order last Friday, however, offers a chance to approach the problem with greater care and scientific reasoning. The new three-judge bench, which reconsidered the case, has attempted to reconcile the legal framework on animal welfare with the legitimate worries of public safety. The Court has clarified that sterilised and vaccinated animals should be returned to their original locations, while those showing signs of rabies, suspected infection, or violent behaviour should remain confined to shelters. This recalibrated stance provides an opportunity to lower tempers and pursue a durable, humane strategy for a long-standing urban challenge.
The starting point must be an honest evaluation of why the Animal Birth Control (Dog) Rules have largely fallen short. Inadequate funding, weak infrastructure, and poor implementation by local authorities have prevented meaningful progress. The Court, in its order, has now demanded that municipal bodies furnish a detailed account of their available facilities - from the number of kennels and veterinarians to dog catchers, vehicles, and equipment needed to enforce the Rules effectively. Extending the ambit of this case to all states and Union Territories means these data points can help map the deficiencies more accurately and inspire practical solutions. They can guide smaller municipalities, which lack the resources of Delhi-NCR, to anticipate hurdles and design more workable approaches. Equally important, such information can highlight the necessity of involving community dog feeders and caregivers in the process. Their voluntary networks could be crucial in ensuring timely vaccinations and health checks, tasks that overburdened civic administrations struggle to manage.
The link between stray dog numbers and unmanaged urban waste must also be recognised. Dogs, like pigeons, crows, and other opportunistic species, thrive on open garbage dumps and overflowing bins. Unless municipal authorities strengthen waste collection and disposal, attempts at controlling the dog population will remain incomplete. Correcting this systemic flaw, alongside sterilisation and vaccination drives, is essential for a comprehensive solution.
The Court's nuanced revision has created a window to address the issue not with anger or emotion, but with science, cooperation, and planning. It is an opportunity that must not be squandered.









