oppn parties Stray Dogs and the Search for Balance

News Snippets

  • Government to introduce PF for self-emplyed and gig workers
  • Crush at Puri Rathyatra leaves 2 dead and 78 injured
  • NEET-UG, marred in controversy due to pape4r leak, saw a huge increase in top scores as two scored 715/720 and 11.2 lkah candidates cleared the exam
  • India's first hydrogen-powered train will be flagged off by PM Modi from Jind in Haryana
  • Delhi HC asks the government to monitor Sona Wnagchuk's health regularly
  • TMC Rajya Sabha MP Koel Mallick resigns from her seat, leaves TMC. Mamata asks all those wishing to leave the party to do so before July 21
  • Calcutta HC says land deed is not a proof of citizenship. Refuses to provide protection to a man facing deportation on basis of land deed
  • Supreme Court tells the government to teach the third language in the 3-language formula in Class 6 and not Class 9
  • Government to take steps to boost liquidity for small businesses
  • RBI says that banks cannot sell seized assets back to the defaulters
  • Centre decides to take equity stakes in semiconductor startups
  • Markets remain flat on Thursday: Sensex closes just 1 point ahead and Nifty ended 5 point lower
  • BCCI:Selectors have possibly decided that Rohit Sharma will not be selected for ODIs after the Lord's game on Sunday
  • Japan Open badminton: P V Sindhu stuns world no. 5 Han Yue of China 21-16, 21-14 to enter the quarterfinals
  • 2nd ODI versus England: Indian batting fails miserably except Gill, Kohli and Iyer to score just 233 all out. England win by 4 wickets
Supreme Court clarifies that it has not issued a blanket ban on use of bulldozers, and they can be used after compliance with procedure laid down in civil laws
oppn parties
Stray Dogs and the Search for Balance

By Our Editorial Team
First publised on 2025-08-27 00:26:02

About the Author

Sunil Garodia The India Commentary view

The sharp reactions to the Supreme Court's August 11 directive ordering the relocation of all stray dogs in Delhi-NCR to shelters exposed how divided public opinion on this matter truly is. Its revised order last Friday, however, offers a chance to approach the problem with greater care and scientific reasoning. The new three-judge bench, which reconsidered the case, has attempted to reconcile the legal framework on animal welfare with the legitimate worries of public safety. The Court has clarified that sterilised and vaccinated animals should be returned to their original locations, while those showing signs of rabies, suspected infection, or violent behaviour should remain confined to shelters. This recalibrated stance provides an opportunity to lower tempers and pursue a durable, humane strategy for a long-standing urban challenge.

The starting point must be an honest evaluation of why the Animal Birth Control (Dog) Rules have largely fallen short. Inadequate funding, weak infrastructure, and poor implementation by local authorities have prevented meaningful progress. The Court, in its order, has now demanded that municipal bodies furnish a detailed account of their available facilities - from the number of kennels and veterinarians to dog catchers, vehicles, and equipment needed to enforce the Rules effectively. Extending the ambit of this case to all states and Union Territories means these data points can help map the deficiencies more accurately and inspire practical solutions. They can guide smaller municipalities, which lack the resources of Delhi-NCR, to anticipate hurdles and design more workable approaches. Equally important, such information can highlight the necessity of involving community dog feeders and caregivers in the process. Their voluntary networks could be crucial in ensuring timely vaccinations and health checks, tasks that overburdened civic administrations struggle to manage.

The link between stray dog numbers and unmanaged urban waste must also be recognised. Dogs, like pigeons, crows, and other opportunistic species, thrive on open garbage dumps and overflowing bins. Unless municipal authorities strengthen waste collection and disposal, attempts at controlling the dog population will remain incomplete. Correcting this systemic flaw, alongside sterilisation and vaccination drives, is essential for a comprehensive solution.

The Court's nuanced revision has created a window to address the issue not with anger or emotion, but with science, cooperation, and planning. It is an opportunity that must not be squandered.