oppn parties Supreme Court: Governor Is A Shorthand Expression For The State Government

News Snippets

  • Government to introduce PF for self-emplyed and gig workers
  • Crush at Puri Rathyatra leaves 2 dead and 78 injured
  • NEET-UG, marred in controversy due to pape4r leak, saw a huge increase in top scores as two scored 715/720 and 11.2 lkah candidates cleared the exam
  • India's first hydrogen-powered train will be flagged off by PM Modi from Jind in Haryana
  • Delhi HC asks the government to monitor Sona Wnagchuk's health regularly
  • TMC Rajya Sabha MP Koel Mallick resigns from her seat, leaves TMC. Mamata asks all those wishing to leave the party to do so before July 21
  • Calcutta HC says land deed is not a proof of citizenship. Refuses to provide protection to a man facing deportation on basis of land deed
  • Supreme Court tells the government to teach the third language in the 3-language formula in Class 6 and not Class 9
  • Government to take steps to boost liquidity for small businesses
  • RBI says that banks cannot sell seized assets back to the defaulters
  • Centre decides to take equity stakes in semiconductor startups
  • Markets remain flat on Thursday: Sensex closes just 1 point ahead and Nifty ended 5 point lower
  • BCCI:Selectors have possibly decided that Rohit Sharma will not be selected for ODIs after the Lord's game on Sunday
  • Japan Open badminton: P V Sindhu stuns world no. 5 Han Yue of China 21-16, 21-14 to enter the quarterfinals
  • 2nd ODI versus England: Indian batting fails miserably except Gill, Kohli and Iyer to score just 233 all out. England win by 4 wickets
Supreme Court clarifies that it has not issued a blanket ban on use of bulldozers, and they can be used after compliance with procedure laid down in civil laws
oppn parties
Supreme Court: Governor Is A Shorthand Expression For The State Government

By Our Editorial Team
First publised on 2022-05-19 06:35:19

About the Author

Sunil Garodia The India Commentary view

The Supreme Court used the extraordinary powers granted to it under Article 142 of the Constitution to do complete justice in a case to release A G Perarivalan, a convict in the Rajiv Gandhi assassination case who has been in jail for 31 years now. The case before the court was complex and involved the questions of the powers of the state government, the powers and role of the Governor, the powers and role of the Centre and the role of the judiciary in such cases.

The verdict has reaffirmed that as per the Constitution, the governor of a state is bound by the advice of the elected government in the state, more so "in matters relating to commutation/remission of sentence under Article 161". In the instant case, the Tamil Nadu government used the power granted to it under the said Article to petition the governor to remit Perarivalan jail term in 2018. But the governor chose to sit on the same. Later, in a move that is not allowed under the Constitution, he made a reference of the petition to the President, who also chose not to take any action. The Supreme Court has clearly said that the governor exceeded his brief and should have allowed the petition as forwarded to him by an elected government.

The court expressly said that if constitutional functionaries do not exercise the powers granted to them or inordinately delay taking a decision, the judiciary can step in to provide relief. Hence, in this case, the court was constrained to use Article 142 and do complete justice in the case by releasing Perarivalan who was languishing in jail even after the state government had decided to remit his term but the decision could not be carried out due to the inaction of the Governor. In calling the governor "but a shorthand expression for the state government", the Supreme Court has clearly indicated that, as per the Constitution, an elected government in supreme in India's federal structure.