oppn parties Supreme Court Versus Prashant Bhushan

News Snippets

  • India will fast-track deployment of 52 defence surveillance satellites
  • In a first, Hinduja Hospital in Mumbai helps patients draw up living will
  • Calcutta HC says that an arrest warrant cannot be issued against an accused who is on anticipatory bail, and if that person is arrested, he or she must be released as per the conditions of the anticipatory bail
  • Monsoon covers entire India 9 days ahead of schedule
  • Maharashtra government scraps order making Hindi the 3rd language in state schools after protests by civil society and opposition
  • A government report says that 64.3% of the population is now under the social security net, up from only 22% in 2016
  • The finance ministry has asked PSB to look at ways to monetise their investment in subsidiaries, by listing them on the stock exchanges
  • After auditor flags overlimit expenses, Karnataka Bank MD & CEO S Hari Hara Sarma and ED Sekhar Rao resign
  • Rosneft likely to sell its stake in Nayara Energy to RIL
  • Ola junks commission-based income model, opts for a daily flat fee from drivers with the hope of attracting more drivers to its platform
  • Torrent Pharma will acquire a controlling stake in JB Chem for Rs 18000cr by buying 46.4% from US fund KKR and another 26% from the public by making an open offer
  • Speculation persists over Jasprit Bumrah making the playing 11 in the second Test against England starting July 2
  • FIH Pro hockey: Indian women slump to their 8th successive loss as they lose to China 2-3
  • US Open BWF Super 300 badminaton: Ayush Shetty wins his first BWF world title by beating Canadian Brian Young 21-18,21-13 but Tanvi Sharma lost in the finals to Beiwwwan Zhang 11-21, 21-16, 10-21
  • R Praggananda wins Tashkent meet, become number 1 chess player in India with FIDE rating of 2799
The SIT formed to probe law college gang-rape in Kolkata has collected the hockey stick used to hit the victim and other rape evidence from the coolege campus /////// Rath Yatra stampede in Puri kills 3
oppn parties
Supreme Court Versus Prashant Bhushan

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2020-07-23 19:57:58

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator.

A lawyer-activist tweets negatively about some recent judicial decisions and questions the Chief Justice for sitting on a motorbike without a mask and helmet. The Supreme Court takes suo motu cognizance and charges him for contempt of court. The apex court's decision to haul up Prashant Bhushan for his tweets is not correct. Many other commentators have also been critical of the way the court has been handling several recent cases. There is no way the court can keep everyone happy with its decisions. If it is doing its job with honesty, it has no reason to be miffed with criticism for interpretation of the law is but a personal reading of the judge or judges based on the bare act and judicial precedents. Also, most daily newspapers were also critical of the Chief Justice when his picture on the motorbike first appeared.

As long as any criticism of a judgment, or judgments, does not attribute motives or cast aspersions on the judges, it should not be termed contemptuous. As different judges can interpret the same law differently, so different commentators can have their own take on judgments. The judges have to recognize this and be lenient for the reason of freedom of speech. If a narrow meaning is assigned to the contempt law it would stifle freedom of speech, the definition of which the Supreme Court has been trying to broaden in several recent judgments. The court has also not specified which of Prashant Bhushan's tweets it found to be contemptuous. A general and sweeping charge is itself bad in law.

Further, the court acted with unseemly haste in the Prashant Bhusan case. When this is juxtaposed with the delay in acting on several other cases of importance, it does not show the court in a good light. It sends the signal that while the court might take its own sweet time in other cases, it will dispense justice quickly if someone encroaches on its turf or as it said in Prashant Bhushan's case brings "the administration of justice in disrepute" or is "capable of undermining the dignity and authority of the institution".  There is no doubt that the system will collapse if motives are ascribed or aspersions are cast on those who dispense justice. But the judges need to take a broader view in the interest of freedom of speech and tolerate criticism as long as it is not mala fide.