oppn parties The Bulldozer Cannot Be Weaponized For State Action

News Snippets

  • Government to introduce PF for self-emplyed and gig workers
  • Crush at Puri Rathyatra leaves 2 dead and 78 injured
  • NEET-UG, marred in controversy due to pape4r leak, saw a huge increase in top scores as two scored 715/720 and 11.2 lkah candidates cleared the exam
  • India's first hydrogen-powered train will be flagged off by PM Modi from Jind in Haryana
  • Delhi HC asks the government to monitor Sona Wnagchuk's health regularly
  • TMC Rajya Sabha MP Koel Mallick resigns from her seat, leaves TMC. Mamata asks all those wishing to leave the party to do so before July 21
  • Calcutta HC says land deed is not a proof of citizenship. Refuses to provide protection to a man facing deportation on basis of land deed
  • Supreme Court tells the government to teach the third language in the 3-language formula in Class 6 and not Class 9
  • Government to take steps to boost liquidity for small businesses
  • RBI says that banks cannot sell seized assets back to the defaulters
  • Centre decides to take equity stakes in semiconductor startups
  • Markets remain flat on Thursday: Sensex closes just 1 point ahead and Nifty ended 5 point lower
  • BCCI:Selectors have possibly decided that Rohit Sharma will not be selected for ODIs after the Lord's game on Sunday
  • Japan Open badminton: P V Sindhu stuns world no. 5 Han Yue of China 21-16, 21-14 to enter the quarterfinals
  • 2nd ODI versus England: Indian batting fails miserably except Gill, Kohli and Iyer to score just 233 all out. England win by 4 wickets
Supreme Court clarifies that it has not issued a blanket ban on use of bulldozers, and they can be used after compliance with procedure laid down in civil laws
oppn parties
The Bulldozer Cannot Be Weaponized For State Action

By Our Editorial Team
First publised on 2022-04-14 07:55:52

About the Author

Sunil Garodia The India Commentary view

After the success of "bulldozer baba" in UP, the ubiquitous demolition machine has made its appearance in Madhya Pradesh after the recent riots. It is very disconcerting that states use their power to ignore rule of law and due process and become judge, jury and executioner to 'punish' those that they think took the law in their hands. Without evidence that has been examined in a court and has been found conclusive enough to punish the perpetrators, states are now veering towards instant justice, the kind hitherto associated with unruly mobs.

But for a democratic nation that swears by the Constitution, has a plethora of laws for almost all kinds of crime and has a well-established judicial system which enforces rule of law and due process, such action against citizens is executive highhandedness of the worst kind. It is unfair as it does not afford an opportunity to the accused to defend themselves. It dishes out 'punishment' for a 'crime' that the executive thinks they committed, without there being a need to let a court examine the evidence, if any.

The MP government has said that it moved against the persons using the MP Prevention of Damage to Public and Private Property and Recovery of Damages Act, and says that the bulldozer was used only against those rioters who were squatting on government land. But why did this dawn on the government only after the riots? If they were indeed squatting of such land, why was action not taken to remove them earlier? The manner in which the government moved against them after the riots shows that there was a desire to 'teach them a lesson'. But such arbitrary action bodes ill for the future as later it might be used against all dissenters. It needs to be stopped. Rule of law and due process must always be followed in all executive action.