oppn parties The Question Was Not Inappropriate, CBSE's Reaction Is

News Snippets

  • Supreme Court questions the continuing relevance of two-child norms. The Court observed that falling fertility rates have weakened the population-control rationale behind laws disqualifying people with more than two children from contesting local body elections. It referred the issue to a larger Bench for consideration
  • Supreme Court declines to shift Tirupati laddu case outside Andhra Pradesh. The Court rejected a plea seeking transfer of the trial, despite arguments that political statements by Andhra Pradesh's Chief Minister and Deputy Chief Minister could affect the fairness of proceedings
  • Supreme Court transfers Azam Khan's fresh ED bail plea to Allahabad High Court. The apex court declined to consider the Samajwadi Party leader's bail request in a fresh Enforcement Directorate case and directed that it be listed before a division Bench of the High Court on November 16
  • Two killed in Delhi building collapse; contractor booked. Two bodies were recovered after a building collapsed in Chawri Bazaar. Delhi Chief Minister Rekha Gupta said the contractor had been booked and the concerned junior and assistant engineers suspended
  • Uttar Pradesh voter rolls show a 2.4-crore discrepancy. A difference of approximately 2.4 crore names has been reported between the state's panchayat and rural Assembly voter lists. The Election Commission has ordered the two sets of rolls to be matched
  • Gujarat announces 3% dearness allowance hike. The state government announced a three-percentage-point increase in dearness allowance for government employees and pensioners ahead of Diwali
  • Sensex and Nifty post their strongest single-day gains in months. The Sensex surged 2,008.61 points, or 2.60%, to close at 79,310.01, while the Nifty 50 climbed 576 points, or 2.40%, to 24,536.60. Financial and automobile stocks led the rally, supported by falling crude prices and renewed foreign investor buying
  • Maaya Rajeshwaran reaches WTA-level quarter-final. The 17-year-old Indian defeated Poland's Weronika Falkowska 6-4, 6-3, becoming the first Indian woman since Sania Mirza in 2012 to reach a quarter-final at a WTA Tour-level singles event
  • Tanvi Patri reaches Youth Olympics badminton final. The 15-year-old defeated Japan's Yuzuno Watanabe in the semi-final, assuring India of a medal and becoming the first Indian badminton player to reach the girls' singles final at the Youth Olympics
  • India beat Pakistan 3-2 in SAFF Championship. India defeated Pakistan in a closely contested match, having led 3-0 before conceding two late goals. The victory was reported as a significant result for India's second-string side
  • India beat Japan 4-1 to win a record sixth Asian Champions Trophy. India recovered from an early deficit to defeat Japan in the final at Mohali, extending its record as the tournament's most successful men's team
  • The Supreme Court issued notice to the Centre and the Election Commission on a petition challenging Section 16 of the Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners Act, 2023, which grants the CEC and Election Commissioners protection from legal proceedings for acts performed in their official duties. The petition argues that such blanket immunity could leave citizens without an effective remedy for alleged wrongdoing by the Commission
  • The Supreme Court told voters whose names were deleted from Delhi's draft electoral rolls not to be apprehensive about seeking re-enrolment through Form 6, after the Election Commission assured it that such applicants would not be prosecuted merely because their names had appeared in earlier rolls
  • Congress leader Rahul Gandhi opened the party's campaign for the 2027 Punjab Assembly elections with an Insaaf rally in Sangrur, Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann's home district, accusing the AAP government of failing to control drugs, gangster violence and corruption. Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge outlined six commitments, including a drug-free Punjab, protection of farmers, employment for young people and action against corruption
  • Rahul Gandhi accused the AAP government of running Punjab through a remote control from Delhi and questioned Bhagwant Mann's ability to tackle drug abuse, making personal allegations about the Chief Minister's conduct during their time together in Parliament
Stock markets on fire due to US results, Sensex gains 2008 points to reach its highest level in 8 months
oppn parties
The Question Was Not Inappropriate, CBSE's Reaction Is

By A Special Correspondent
First publised on 2021-12-03 15:33:52

In the sociology text book prepared by NCERT - an autonomous body that prepares study material for subjects chosen by the CBSE - another autonomous body, there is a paragraph which rightly informs the Class XII students about two of the ugliest communal incidents in contemporary India. The paragraph reads "the two most traumatic contemporary instances of communal violence occurred under each of the major political parties. The anti-Sikh riots of Delhi in 1984 took place under a Congress regime. The unprecedented scale and spread of anti-Muslim violence in Gujarat in 2002 took place under a BJP government." Then, in the ongoing Term I examination for Class XII students, the sociology question paper contained the question: 'the unprecedented scale and spread of anti-Muslim violence in Gujarat in 2002 took place under which government?' The students were to choose the right answer from the given choices like, 'Congress', 'BJP', 'Democratic' and 'Republican'.

This seems to be a perfect example of testing the knowledge of the students. But the CBSE has called the question erroneous and 'inappropriate'. It cannot be erroneous for the simple reason that if the text book contained the information, the paper-setter was nowhere in the wrong to test the students on it. It cannot be 'inappropriate' as if the students can be taught about the 'traumatic contemporary instances of communal violence', then why can't they be asked to answer question on them? Or would it have been 'appropriate' if the question was about the anti-Sikh riots?

It is sad that autonomous bodies like the CBSE think that they will incur the wrath of the ruling dispensation if they allow things in the text books or question papers that paint it in a shady light. The Gujarat riots happened. They happened under the BJP. The students were taught that. Then where is the problem in the question paper? How does the question become erroneous and 'inappropriate'?

Education is about teaching the students everything related to the subject. Sociology demands that students be taught how India has managed to live with its diversity. Obviously, if social harmony is to be highlighted, social ugliness like communal riots also needs to be highlighted. The dirt cannot be brushed under the carpet.

NCERT would do well to make its text books inclusive and pertinent without toeing a particular line. CBSE would do well to allow its paper-setters to follow the text books in setting the question papers. After all, they are autonomous bodies. But if these bodies decide to kowtow to the political masters, education will suffer and the students might be left to understand that the anti-Sikh riots did happen under a Congress regime and there were no anti-Muslim riots in Gujarat in 2002. In the instant case, there should be no move to punish either the paper-setter or the person who wrote the chapter/paragraph in the text book.