oppn parties Was Phone Tapping In Rajasthan Done Illegally?

News Snippets

  • Supreme Court questions the continuing relevance of two-child norms. The Court observed that falling fertility rates have weakened the population-control rationale behind laws disqualifying people with more than two children from contesting local body elections. It referred the issue to a larger Bench for consideration
  • Supreme Court declines to shift Tirupati laddu case outside Andhra Pradesh. The Court rejected a plea seeking transfer of the trial, despite arguments that political statements by Andhra Pradesh's Chief Minister and Deputy Chief Minister could affect the fairness of proceedings
  • Supreme Court transfers Azam Khan's fresh ED bail plea to Allahabad High Court. The apex court declined to consider the Samajwadi Party leader's bail request in a fresh Enforcement Directorate case and directed that it be listed before a division Bench of the High Court on November 16
  • Two killed in Delhi building collapse; contractor booked. Two bodies were recovered after a building collapsed in Chawri Bazaar. Delhi Chief Minister Rekha Gupta said the contractor had been booked and the concerned junior and assistant engineers suspended
  • Uttar Pradesh voter rolls show a 2.4-crore discrepancy. A difference of approximately 2.4 crore names has been reported between the state's panchayat and rural Assembly voter lists. The Election Commission has ordered the two sets of rolls to be matched
  • Gujarat announces 3% dearness allowance hike. The state government announced a three-percentage-point increase in dearness allowance for government employees and pensioners ahead of Diwali
  • Sensex and Nifty post their strongest single-day gains in months. The Sensex surged 2,008.61 points, or 2.60%, to close at 79,310.01, while the Nifty 50 climbed 576 points, or 2.40%, to 24,536.60. Financial and automobile stocks led the rally, supported by falling crude prices and renewed foreign investor buying
  • Maaya Rajeshwaran reaches WTA-level quarter-final. The 17-year-old Indian defeated Poland's Weronika Falkowska 6-4, 6-3, becoming the first Indian woman since Sania Mirza in 2012 to reach a quarter-final at a WTA Tour-level singles event
  • Tanvi Patri reaches Youth Olympics badminton final. The 15-year-old defeated Japan's Yuzuno Watanabe in the semi-final, assuring India of a medal and becoming the first Indian badminton player to reach the girls' singles final at the Youth Olympics
  • India beat Pakistan 3-2 in SAFF Championship. India defeated Pakistan in a closely contested match, having led 3-0 before conceding two late goals. The victory was reported as a significant result for India's second-string side
  • India beat Japan 4-1 to win a record sixth Asian Champions Trophy. India recovered from an early deficit to defeat Japan in the final at Mohali, extending its record as the tournament's most successful men's team
  • The Supreme Court issued notice to the Centre and the Election Commission on a petition challenging Section 16 of the Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners Act, 2023, which grants the CEC and Election Commissioners protection from legal proceedings for acts performed in their official duties. The petition argues that such blanket immunity could leave citizens without an effective remedy for alleged wrongdoing by the Commission
  • The Supreme Court told voters whose names were deleted from Delhi's draft electoral rolls not to be apprehensive about seeking re-enrolment through Form 6, after the Election Commission assured it that such applicants would not be prosecuted merely because their names had appeared in earlier rolls
  • Congress leader Rahul Gandhi opened the party's campaign for the 2027 Punjab Assembly elections with an Insaaf rally in Sangrur, Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann's home district, accusing the AAP government of failing to control drugs, gangster violence and corruption. Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge outlined six commitments, including a drug-free Punjab, protection of farmers, employment for young people and action against corruption
  • Rahul Gandhi accused the AAP government of running Punjab through a remote control from Delhi and questioned Bhagwant Mann's ability to tackle drug abuse, making personal allegations about the Chief Minister's conduct during their time together in Parliament
Stock markets on fire due to US results, Sensex gains 2008 points to reach its highest level in 8 months
oppn parties
Was Phone Tapping In Rajasthan Done Illegally?

By A Special Correspondent
First publised on 2020-07-18 21:37:29

Did the Rajasthan government illegally tap the phone of BJP leaders and most probably of Congress MLAs close to Sachin Pilot? BJP spokesman Sambit Patra raised these questions at a press conference today. He also raised questions on the authenticity of the audio clips and charged the Ashok Gehlot government of not following the rules laid down for phone tapping. The party has demanded a CBI probe into the matter.

The Congress had yesterday read out what it alleged were transcripts of the said audiotapes without actually playing them at a press conference in Jaipur. In any case, permission needs to be taken from the state home secretary before putting any phone under surveillance or recording the conversation or other data like SMS messages. The Congress did not specify how it got the said audio clips. Did the Gehlot government follow the rules or did it tap the phones illegally? That is the big question.

But all governments, whether of the BJP or the Congress or the regional parties, are guilty of illegally tapping phones of political leaders. The modus operandi is the same. No written orders are issued. Operators are ordered verbally, bullied or threatened into doing the needful. Since it is done for gathering information, no trace is left after the work is done. There are advanced devices that can tap mobile phone conversations without involving the operator. It is being done in all states at all times. Sometimes it is exposed and at most other times it is not.

Governments are unconcerned about the legality because if anything incriminating is recorded and needs to be produced in the court as evidence it can be done due to several case laws on the subject. While the most cited case in this regard is R M Malkani versus State of Maharashtra, there are other cases where illegally obtained telephone recordings were admitted as corroborative evidence. And which government in India is ever concerned about the morality or the bad publicity it receives due to the covert act of phone tapping?