oppn parties Airlines: Low-Cost, No-Frills Doesn't Mean No Service

News Snippets

  • R G Kar rape-murder hearing start in Kolkata's Sealdah court on Monday
  • Calcutta HC rules that a person cannot be indicted for consensual sex after promise of marriage even if he reneges on that promise later
  • Cryptocurrencies jump after Trump's win, Bitcoin goes past $84K while Dogecoin jumps 50%
  • Vistara merges with Air India today
  • GST Council to decide on zero tax on term plans and select health covers in its Dec 21-22 meeting
  • SIP inflows stood at a record Rs 25323cr in October
  • Chess: Chennai GM tournament - Aravindh Chithambaram shares the top spot with two others
  • Asian Champions Trophy hockey for women: India thrash Malaysia 4-0
  • Batteries, chains and screws were among 65 objects found in the stomach of a 14-year-old Hathras boy who died after these objects were removed in a complex surgery at Delhi's Safdarjung Hospital
  • India confirms that 'verification patrolling' is on at Demchok and Depsang in Ladakh after disengagement of troops
  • LeT commander and 2 other terrorists killed in Srinagar in a gunbattle with security forces. 4 security personnel injured too.
  • Man arrested in Nagpur for sending hoax emails to the PMO in order to get his book published
  • Adani Power sets a deadline of November 7 for Bangladesh to clear its dues, failing which the company will stop supplying power to the nation
  • Shubman Gill (90) and Rishabh Pant (60) ensure India get a lead in the final Test after which Ashwin and Jadeja reduce the visitors to 171 for 9 in the second innings
  • Final Test versus New Zealand: Match evenly poised as NZ are 143 ahead with 1 wicket in hand
Security forces gun down 10 'armed militants' in Manipur's Jiribam district but locals say those killed were village volunteers and claim that 11, and not 10, were killed
oppn parties
Airlines: Low-Cost, No-Frills Doesn't Mean No Service

By admin
First publised on 2018-04-11 11:22:36

About the Author

Sunil Garodia By our team of in-house writers.
People are talking about how low cost airlines are treating people like dirt. People say that the airlines think that since they are carrying passengers at rock bottom fares, they do not have any obligation towards them. People are shocked at the way a passenger was manhandled and offloaded from an Indigo flight on April 10 for protesting against mosquitoes inside the aircraft. But have the passengers asked for the fares to be low? Was there an agitation by flyers that airlines should keep these fares? Or was it a realization in the airline industry that volume-based profitability would be better than percentage-based?

In any case, people say that when fares were lowered, the airlines cut out all the frills associated with flying. Old timers remember how cotton (for passengers with air problem in ears), lozenses and wet tissues, along with excellent meals would be given on all flights before the low cost airlines changed the rules of the game. But people say that maintaining cleanliness in aircrafts and being courteous to passengers are two things, among others, that no airline can dispense with. People also point out that these low coast carriers charge astronomical amounts for all other services. People say that passengers pay what the airlines ask them and they deserve better treatment.

People are asking that if the airlines can have a no-fly list that will have names of rude passengers who will not be allowed to fly, there should also be a detailed guideline issued to these airlines for the behavior of their staff in any given situation. Any staffer found misbehaving with passengers must be suspended. The airlines and their staff must not behave as if they are doing a favour by carrying passengers. If it is not remunerative for them to fly passengers at these fares, they should either increase the fares or shut operations but on no account should they treat passengers like beggars and maintain basic cleanliness in the aircrafts.