oppn parties Ayodhya: SC Exploring Mediation Before Final Hearing

News Snippets

  • 16 killed as the vehicle they were traveling in plunged into a deep gorge near Jammu
  • Vodafone CEO seeks government relief, saying India operations on the verge of collapse
  • Three teenagers killed in a major accident in Kolkata's New Town area when their Honda City rammed into a road divider and a Metro pillar. The car was mangled
  • Vishwa Hindu Parishad not to publicly 'celebrate' Babri Masjid demolition day this year, all events will be closed door
  • JNU students march against the steep hike in fees, keep HRD minister Ramesh Pokhriyal stuck at the venue of the convocation
  • USFDA says Cytotron, an anti-cancer kit developed by Bengaluru based Rajah Vijay Kumar, is a "breakthrough device" for treating liver, pancreatic and breast cancers
  • Car sales show a minuscule uptrend after declining continuously for 11 months
  • Industrial output contracts by 4.3% in September, the worst decline in 8 years
  • Centre defends abrogation of Article 370 in the Supreme Court, says the power under it was used by the President six times previously
  • Legendary singer Lata Mangeshkar admitted to hospital with lung infection, put on ventilator
  • Shiv Sena MP Arvind Sawant quits as Union Minister
  • National Security Advisor Ajit Doval met the leaders of both Hindus and Muslims in Delhi on Sunday to ensure peace and harmony is maintained after the Ayodhya verdict
  • Tipu Jayanti passes off peacefully in Karnataka
  • 10 dead as Cyclone Bulbul leaves destruction in its wake in West Bengal
  • Shefali Verma breaks Sachin's 30-year old record by scoring an international fifty at 15 years and 285 days
India Commentary wishes all its readers a very Happy Guruparab
oppn parties
Ayodhya: SC Exploring Mediation Before Final Hearing

By Sunil Garodia

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Writes for a number of publications.
The Supreme Court has ordered mediation in the Babri Masjid-Ram Janmabhoomi dispute, despite knowing that there have been numerous efforts at mediation in the past and all of them had failed. How then does it think that the panel now appointed by it will succeed, especially when one of the members of the panel has a record of making statements that can be construed as being biased towards the Hindus? The saving grace is that the court has allowed only eight weeks for the process, keeping in view that almost the same time will be needed to prepare for the final hearing in the case and then the final order. Also, it is better for social harmony to explore all options before doing what needs to be done as per law.

The court must decide on the title suits under consideration. There is no other visible way of resolving the dispute. Obviously, if mediation is successful then all parties will be happy as a court order generally aggrieves one or more parties to a suit. But if after eight weeks there are no signs of an out of court settlement through mediation, the court will have to pronounce its verdict on the title suits. The court had, in a landmark judgment in 1994, refused to be drawn into the faith-based question of whether a Ram Temple existed at the disputed site and was demolished to build the Babri Masjid. Hence, following the due process of law, the decision on the title suits should once and for all resolve the dispute.

Although all parties to the dispute have time and again said that they will abide by the order of the court, it is doubtful whether those bent on building the temple at the exact spot will be pacified if the order goes against them. “Mandir wahin banayenge” has now become more than a matter of faith – it has become a war cry to show the Muslims who is the boss. The Allahabad High Court had suggested a three-way split of the land in Ayodhya between Ram Lalla, the Nirmohi Akhara and the Sunni Wakf Board. That verdict is still under appeal. For peace and harmony to prevail, there must both be a grand Ram Mandir and a restored Babri Masjid at the site. But it can only be possible if the Supreme Court finds that the title in the land vests with all three parties and divides the disputed land accordingly and more importantly, the government is fair to both the communities.

pic credit: lawcorner.in