oppn parties Centre Cites Scientific Study To Claim That Stubble Burning Is Not A Major Contributor To Pollution In Delhi

News Snippets

  • Government to introduce PF for self-emplyed and gig workers
  • Crush at Puri Rathyatra leaves 2 dead and 78 injured
  • NEET-UG, marred in controversy due to pape4r leak, saw a huge increase in top scores as two scored 715/720 and 11.2 lkah candidates cleared the exam
  • India's first hydrogen-powered train will be flagged off by PM Modi from Jind in Haryana
  • Delhi HC asks the government to monitor Sona Wnagchuk's health regularly
  • TMC Rajya Sabha MP Koel Mallick resigns from her seat, leaves TMC. Mamata asks all those wishing to leave the party to do so before July 21
  • Calcutta HC says land deed is not a proof of citizenship. Refuses to provide protection to a man facing deportation on basis of land deed
  • Supreme Court tells the government to teach the third language in the 3-language formula in Class 6 and not Class 9
  • Government to take steps to boost liquidity for small businesses
  • RBI says that banks cannot sell seized assets back to the defaulters
  • Centre decides to take equity stakes in semiconductor startups
  • Markets remain flat on Thursday: Sensex closes just 1 point ahead and Nifty ended 5 point lower
  • BCCI:Selectors have possibly decided that Rohit Sharma will not be selected for ODIs after the Lord's game on Sunday
  • Japan Open badminton: P V Sindhu stuns world no. 5 Han Yue of China 21-16, 21-14 to enter the quarterfinals
  • 2nd ODI versus England: Indian batting fails miserably except Gill, Kohli and Iyer to score just 233 all out. England win by 4 wickets
Supreme Court clarifies that it has not issued a blanket ban on use of bulldozers, and they can be used after compliance with procedure laid down in civil laws
oppn parties
Centre Cites Scientific Study To Claim That Stubble Burning Is Not A Major Contributor To Pollution In Delhi

By Linus Garg
First publised on 2021-11-15 16:20:37

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Linus tackles things head-on. He takes sides in his analysis and it fits excellently with our editorial policy. No 'maybe's' and 'allegedly' for him, only things in black and white.

The Centre today presented facts (in the form of a scientific study) before the Supreme Court that proved that stubble burning, often said to be the main culprit behind the worsening air quality in Delhi, contributes less than 10 percent to the overall pollution in the capital, prompting the apex court to pull up the Delhi government for making excuses. The bench categorically said that industry, transport and dust particles were mainly responsible for making life hell for the people of Delhi and called them "the major culprit of pollution", though it also advised neighbouring states to try and stop stubble burning for a week to bring down the pollution level in the capital. But the AAP government in Delhi accused the Centre of "misleading the Supreme Court" and the lawyer for the petitioners said that the government was taking this stand as it did not want to displease the farmers.

There is no doubt that stubble burning contributes in worsening the air quality in Delhi. For years, the governments at the Centre and in the states have been thinking of ways to put a stop to the practice. But till now, the percentage of contribution of stubble burning (variously pegged at between 30 and 40 percent) was just a guesstimate. But the scientific study now cited by the Centre has put it at within 10 percent. The Centre had, however, in an earlier affidavit before the apex court, put it at 40 percent, as AAP has pointed out.

But as the Centre has now cited facts, just berating it for deviating from its earlier position is not enough. Those who still feel that stubble burning is contributing more than 10 percent need to counter that with their own verified facts. Till that is done, the scientific study cited by the Centre and accepted, for all practical purposes by the apex court, will rule. Hence, till it has facts that prove otherwise, the Delhi government will do well to heed the suggestions of the apex court and try and reduce pollution by taking steps to control industrial and vehicular pollution as also the dust particles released in the air by construction and other activities.