oppn parties Conversion Law Unlikely To Pass Judicial Scrutiny

News Snippets

  • NCLT initiates bankruptcy proceedings against former Videocon chairman Venugopal Dhoot for defaulting on loans of Rs 6158cr as personal guarantor in two group companies
  • LIC approves 1:1 bonus share issue
  • Gold and silver futures also go down by 0.7% and 2.2% respectively
  • Stocks tumbled again on Monday as crude prices rose: Sensex went down by 703 points and Nifty by 207 points
  • Supreme Court refuses to cancel the land-for-jobs FIR against Lalu Prasad
  • The spectre of El Nino haunts India: IMD predicts 'below normal ' monsoon this year
  • Labour protest over increase in wages by 35% (as per Haryana example) turns violent in Noida, nearly 200 were detained by the police
  • Congress leader Sonia Gandhi said that the delimitation exercise must be carried out after the Census is complete
  • PM Modi says Parliament is on the verge of creating history as the Houses get ready to take up the women's reservation bills
  • Tata Sons chairman N Chandrasekaran said that TCS COO Aarthi Subramanian is conducting a thorough inquiry to establish facts and identify individuals involved in the sexual harassment allegations at the company's Nashik office
  • Asha Bhonsle laid to rest with full state honours on Monday in Mumbai
  • AAP leader Arvind Kejriwal once again approached the Delhi HC to request the recusal of a judge from his case
  • Candidates Chess: R Vaishali on the verge of creating history, but needs two wins - one with black pieces - against formidable opponents to emerge as the challenger
  • Rohit Sharma, who retired hurt in the match versus RCB, underwent scans for possible hamstring injury
  • IPL: Abhishek Sharma fails for SRH but Ishan Kishan (91) shines. Then, Vaibhav Sooryavanshi fails for RR and SRH bolwers, especially unheralded Praful Hinge (4 for 24) and Sakib Hussain (4 for 24) win it for SRH. This was the first loss for table-toppers RR
Supreme Court questions Election Commission about SIR SOP and why logical discrepancy was introduced only in Bengal
oppn parties
Conversion Law Unlikely To Pass Judicial Scrutiny

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2020-12-01 08:45:41

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Author of Cyber Scams in India, Digital Arrest, The Money Trap and The Human Hack

It seems that the judiciary and the executive and legislature are on a collision course where interfaith marriages are concerned. BJP ruled states are firm on clamping down on what they call love jehad, with UP already having enacted a law on the subject. Haryana and Karnataka have indicated their strong desire to follow suit. The UP ordinance that has already got the governor's nod prescribes a jail term of 1 to 5 years and a fine of Rs 15000 (in case of minors or SC/ST, it goes up to 3 to 10 years and a fine of Rs 25000). Mass conversions will attract a jail term of 3 to 10 years with a fine of Rs 50000. Under the Special Marriage Act, the couple has to give a notice of one month about their wish to marry. But the UP Prohibition of Unlawful Religious Conversion ordinance has prescribed that if anyone is converting to another religion before marriage, she or he will have to inform the District Magistrate 2 months in advance. Failure to do so would a prison term of 6 months to 3 years and a fine of Rs 10000.

This is a direct interference by the state in the matter of freedom of choice of individuals. Cupid has his own ways of striking. Love can happen between any two individuals, irrespective of caste, creed, age and religious, linguistic or regional affinities. Love jehad is a term that implies that Muslim males, as part of a deeper conspiracy, are targeting Hindu females for the sole reason of misleading them into love and marriage with the intention to convert them to Islam. If that were true, then obviously action taken by the government would have been justified. But is it actually true? Crime figures in UP or elsewhere do not support this contention. There has not been an avalanche of FIRs by parents about their daughters converting to Islam for marrying Muslims. Even in individual cases that have sought to be highlighted, almost always the girl has testified that she converted out of her free will to marry the boy as she loved him.

But will any such law stand judicial scrutiny? Even as the UP government approved the ordinance, the Allahabad High Court delivered a judgment that restrained the administration, the police and the parents of a girl from interfering in the married life of a couple where the Hindu girl had converted to marry the Muslim boy. The court said that "the right to choose a partner irrespective of caste, creed or religion is inherited under the right to life and personal liberty". The court further said that it did not see the couple as Hindu or Muslim but as two grown-up individuals. Any law that denies the freedom of choice and impinges upon rights is unlikely to pass legal muster. The UP government must first prove a conspiracy by the Muslim society to start a love jehad (although this is an obnoxious term) with facts and figures and should not rely on fake WhatsApp forwards that allege such a concerted act on part of the Muslim society. In the meantime, it should not create hurdles for any two persons willing to marry out of their own free will.