oppn parties Conversion Law Unlikely To Pass Judicial Scrutiny

News Snippets

  • Supreme Court rules that functional disability should be the deciding factor in granting road accident damages and not any doctor-issued disability certificate
  • Supreme Court flagged the fact that nearly 56% of the vehicles plying in India were uninsured and asked the government to challan them
  • An Air India flight from Phuket to Delhi encountered severe turbulence and 17 passengers were admitted to hospital with injuries
  • Calcutta HC said that heavens won't fall if Vande Matram is made mandatory to sing in madrasas
  • Kolkata Municipal Corporation has sought government nod for increasing city's wards to 200+ to keep residents in each ward between 16000 to 18000
  • Government has said that partially filled online Census forms may be allowed
  • Government may allow fees on UPI payments above Rs 2000, except on transfer between two individuals
  • Brent crude falls below $80 per barrel
  • Government has increased the LIC offer for sale to Rs 31,400cr with an additional 4% on the block
  • Stock markets become nervous on Tuesday due to Gulf situation: Sensex slides 210 points and Nifty sheds 159 points ahead of RBI MPC meets today
  • Indian cricket team lands in Sri Lanka for a 2-Test series
  • A former French Navy pilot who had alleged that IAF had lost Rafales during Operation Sindoor has been held in France on spying charges
  • An ordinary zari worked living just 100km away from Kolkata was stunned to find Rs 100cr deposited in the bank account. The bank has frozen her account pending enquiry
  • Businessmen in Kolkata gets a Rs 5-crore extortion call, allegedly from the Lawrence Bishnoi gang
  • NTA floats tenders to secure offices and exam materials round-the-clock
Tarun Tejpal, former editor of Tehelka, was sentenced to 10 years in jail by Bombay HC for raping a colleague. This judgment overturns the acquittal by a Goa sessions court
oppn parties
Conversion Law Unlikely To Pass Judicial Scrutiny

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2020-12-01 08:45:41

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Author of Cyber Scams in India, Digital Arrest, The Money Trap and The Human Hack

It seems that the judiciary and the executive and legislature are on a collision course where interfaith marriages are concerned. BJP ruled states are firm on clamping down on what they call love jehad, with UP already having enacted a law on the subject. Haryana and Karnataka have indicated their strong desire to follow suit. The UP ordinance that has already got the governor's nod prescribes a jail term of 1 to 5 years and a fine of Rs 15000 (in case of minors or SC/ST, it goes up to 3 to 10 years and a fine of Rs 25000). Mass conversions will attract a jail term of 3 to 10 years with a fine of Rs 50000. Under the Special Marriage Act, the couple has to give a notice of one month about their wish to marry. But the UP Prohibition of Unlawful Religious Conversion ordinance has prescribed that if anyone is converting to another religion before marriage, she or he will have to inform the District Magistrate 2 months in advance. Failure to do so would a prison term of 6 months to 3 years and a fine of Rs 10000.

This is a direct interference by the state in the matter of freedom of choice of individuals. Cupid has his own ways of striking. Love can happen between any two individuals, irrespective of caste, creed, age and religious, linguistic or regional affinities. Love jehad is a term that implies that Muslim males, as part of a deeper conspiracy, are targeting Hindu females for the sole reason of misleading them into love and marriage with the intention to convert them to Islam. If that were true, then obviously action taken by the government would have been justified. But is it actually true? Crime figures in UP or elsewhere do not support this contention. There has not been an avalanche of FIRs by parents about their daughters converting to Islam for marrying Muslims. Even in individual cases that have sought to be highlighted, almost always the girl has testified that she converted out of her free will to marry the boy as she loved him.

But will any such law stand judicial scrutiny? Even as the UP government approved the ordinance, the Allahabad High Court delivered a judgment that restrained the administration, the police and the parents of a girl from interfering in the married life of a couple where the Hindu girl had converted to marry the Muslim boy. The court said that "the right to choose a partner irrespective of caste, creed or religion is inherited under the right to life and personal liberty". The court further said that it did not see the couple as Hindu or Muslim but as two grown-up individuals. Any law that denies the freedom of choice and impinges upon rights is unlikely to pass legal muster. The UP government must first prove a conspiracy by the Muslim society to start a love jehad (although this is an obnoxious term) with facts and figures and should not rely on fake WhatsApp forwards that allege such a concerted act on part of the Muslim society. In the meantime, it should not create hurdles for any two persons willing to marry out of their own free will.