oppn parties Conversion Law Unlikely To Pass Judicial Scrutiny

News Snippets

  • Allahabad HC said that the UP Police is acting as law unto themselves as they detained a person unlawfully even before his arrest
  • Kolkata witnesses traffic snarls on the first day of the Durga Puja festival as revellers start pnadal-hopping
  • Neha Bora was subsequently released and Dipke is to appear before a magistrate today at noon
  • Delhi Police detained Cockroach Janta Party founder Abhijeet Dipke, Neha Bora of AISA, student leaders and supporters ahead of a rally in Connaught Place demanding Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar's resignation. The protest followed the detention and jailing of two CJP leaders earlier in the week over demonstrations at Jantar Mantar
  • The Reserve Bank of India is considering further monetary tightening to counter capital outflows and increase the cost of betting against the rupee, according to bankers and analysts cited by Reuters. The measures follow recent rate increases and steps to drain liquidity as pressure on the currency and inflation concerns persist
  • India directed oil marketing companies to stop diverting sugar-based feedstocks for ethanol production in the 2026–27 supply year, according to a new tender issued on Friday. The companies have invited bids for 11 billion litres of ethanol made from alternatives including corn and broken rice, amid concerns about domestic sugar supplies and prices
  • Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman said India's trade imbalance with China was growing sharply and attributed the problem partly to restrictions on Indian goods and services entering the Chinese market. China subsequently said it was ready to work with India to address mutual economic and trade concerns; India's trade deficit with China reached $69 billion in the first half of FY2026–27, up 27% year-on-year
  • Indian equity benchmarks extended their recovery on Friday, with the Sensex rising 413.66 points to close at 74,729.27 and the Nifty 50 gaining 148.80 points to settle at 23,146.15. Information technology shares, including Tech Mahindra, Infosys and TCS, helped lift the indices
  • India defeated Zimbabwe by four wickets in the opening women's T20 International in Raipur, taking a 1–0 lead in the three-match series. Deepti Sharma and Niki Prasad combined in an 82-run stand after India's top order collapsed, helping the hosts chase down Zimbabwe's total of 114 for five
  • Indian wrestler Komal won bronze in the women's 59 kg category at the Under-23 World Wrestling Championships in Las Vegas, defeating Kazakhstan's Viktoriia Khusainova 7–2. Fellow Indian Amruta Pujari advanced to the women's 72 kg final after recording two pinfall victories
  • Indian shuttler Jagsher Singh Khangurra secured a bronze medal at the BWF World Junior Badminton Championships in Cairo
  • The Supreme Court of India upheld the Bombay High Court's decision quashing the 2020 write-off of ₹8,415 crore in additional tier-1 bonds issued by Yes Bank (Yes Bank). The court ruled that the bank's administrator lacked the authority to extinguish the bonds under the final reconstruction scheme, strengthening bondholders' claims
  • The Supreme Court issued notices to the Election Commission of India, Delhi Police and opposition leaders, including Rahul Gandhi and Akhilesh Yadav, in separate petitions concerning electoral-roll revision and protests held in Delhi on October 10–12. The court also directed the preservation of CCTV footage linked to allegations of police excesses
  • The Supreme Court ruled that a person converting from Hinduism to Islam cannot automatically claim backward-class reservation benefits in the new religious community solely on the basis of their previous caste status. The judgment upheld the Madras High Court's decision striking down a 2024 Tamil Nadu government order that permitted such certification for specified communities
  • The Election Commission of India ordered a Special Summary Revision of electoral rolls in 14 states and three Union Territories, using January 1, 2027, as the qualifying date for voter eligibility. The draft rolls are scheduled for publication on November 12, claims and objections will be accepted until December 11, and the final rolls are due on January 4, 2027
Delhi HC refuses to ban CJP's Tiranga rally at Central Park in Connaught Place today /////// Police says will control and regulate it /////// NDMC closes the park for the public on Friday and Saturday
oppn parties
Conversion Law Unlikely To Pass Judicial Scrutiny

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2020-12-01 08:45:41

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Author of Cyber Scams in India, Digital Arrest, The Money Trap and The Human Hack

It seems that the judiciary and the executive and legislature are on a collision course where interfaith marriages are concerned. BJP ruled states are firm on clamping down on what they call love jehad, with UP already having enacted a law on the subject. Haryana and Karnataka have indicated their strong desire to follow suit. The UP ordinance that has already got the governor's nod prescribes a jail term of 1 to 5 years and a fine of Rs 15000 (in case of minors or SC/ST, it goes up to 3 to 10 years and a fine of Rs 25000). Mass conversions will attract a jail term of 3 to 10 years with a fine of Rs 50000. Under the Special Marriage Act, the couple has to give a notice of one month about their wish to marry. But the UP Prohibition of Unlawful Religious Conversion ordinance has prescribed that if anyone is converting to another religion before marriage, she or he will have to inform the District Magistrate 2 months in advance. Failure to do so would a prison term of 6 months to 3 years and a fine of Rs 10000.

This is a direct interference by the state in the matter of freedom of choice of individuals. Cupid has his own ways of striking. Love can happen between any two individuals, irrespective of caste, creed, age and religious, linguistic or regional affinities. Love jehad is a term that implies that Muslim males, as part of a deeper conspiracy, are targeting Hindu females for the sole reason of misleading them into love and marriage with the intention to convert them to Islam. If that were true, then obviously action taken by the government would have been justified. But is it actually true? Crime figures in UP or elsewhere do not support this contention. There has not been an avalanche of FIRs by parents about their daughters converting to Islam for marrying Muslims. Even in individual cases that have sought to be highlighted, almost always the girl has testified that she converted out of her free will to marry the boy as she loved him.

But will any such law stand judicial scrutiny? Even as the UP government approved the ordinance, the Allahabad High Court delivered a judgment that restrained the administration, the police and the parents of a girl from interfering in the married life of a couple where the Hindu girl had converted to marry the Muslim boy. The court said that "the right to choose a partner irrespective of caste, creed or religion is inherited under the right to life and personal liberty". The court further said that it did not see the couple as Hindu or Muslim but as two grown-up individuals. Any law that denies the freedom of choice and impinges upon rights is unlikely to pass legal muster. The UP government must first prove a conspiracy by the Muslim society to start a love jehad (although this is an obnoxious term) with facts and figures and should not rely on fake WhatsApp forwards that allege such a concerted act on part of the Muslim society. In the meantime, it should not create hurdles for any two persons willing to marry out of their own free will.