oppn parties Demolishing Kangana Ranaut's Office: "Illegal And Mala Fide" Says Bombay HC

News Snippets

  • Government to introduce PF for self-emplyed and gig workers
  • Crush at Puri Rathyatra leaves 2 dead and 78 injured
  • NEET-UG, marred in controversy due to pape4r leak, saw a huge increase in top scores as two scored 715/720 and 11.2 lkah candidates cleared the exam
  • India's first hydrogen-powered train will be flagged off by PM Modi from Jind in Haryana
  • Delhi HC asks the government to monitor Sona Wnagchuk's health regularly
  • TMC Rajya Sabha MP Koel Mallick resigns from her seat, leaves TMC. Mamata asks all those wishing to leave the party to do so before July 21
  • Calcutta HC says land deed is not a proof of citizenship. Refuses to provide protection to a man facing deportation on basis of land deed
  • Supreme Court tells the government to teach the third language in the 3-language formula in Class 6 and not Class 9
  • Government to take steps to boost liquidity for small businesses
  • RBI says that banks cannot sell seized assets back to the defaulters
  • Centre decides to take equity stakes in semiconductor startups
  • Markets remain flat on Thursday: Sensex closes just 1 point ahead and Nifty ended 5 point lower
  • BCCI:Selectors have possibly decided that Rohit Sharma will not be selected for ODIs after the Lord's game on Sunday
  • Japan Open badminton: P V Sindhu stuns world no. 5 Han Yue of China 21-16, 21-14 to enter the quarterfinals
  • 2nd ODI versus England: Indian batting fails miserably except Gill, Kohli and Iyer to score just 233 all out. England win by 4 wickets
Supreme Court clarifies that it has not issued a blanket ban on use of bulldozers, and they can be used after compliance with procedure laid down in civil laws
oppn parties
Demolishing Kangana Ranaut's Office: "Illegal And Mala Fide" Says Bombay HC

By A Special Correspondent
First publised on 2020-11-28 12:58:54

In a scathing judgment, the Bombay High Court has come down heavily on the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) for illegally demolishing a portion of actor Kangana Ranaut's bungalow which she was using as the office of her production house. The court has found the action "illegal and high-handed" and "actuated by mala fides", thereby proving what Ranaut said when her house was demolished.

The main defense of BMC was that it demolished the portion after giving only 24-hours' notice as under section 354A of the BMC Act as it was empowered to do so in case of ongoing work. But the court refused to accept that contention and treating photographs as proof, said that the work was pre-existing and section 351, which calls for a seven-day notice, should have been invoked.

The court found this an attempt to deny legal recourse to Ranaut. It said that "the whole attempt of the BMC and its officers was to somehow present the petitioner with a fait accompli, leaving her practically no time to seek redressal". It is well known that Ranaut was not in Mumbai when the BMC bulldozers sneaked in to carry out the illegal task.

The court took cognizance of the ongoing feud between the Shiv Sena (which runs the BMC) and Kangana Ranaut and said that "irresponsible statements, however distasteful, are best ignored" but it added that "illegal and colourable action on part of the state or its agencies vis-a-vis a citizen is far too serious and damaging to society to be overlooked". Courts in India have become the last recourse the citizen has in his or her fight against the might of the state. 

This is a serious slap in the face for government agencies and officers who blindly carry out the orders of their political masters, often bending the law to achieve the results desired by the political class. Revenge was the entire motive behind the BMC action and the court has rightly quashed the orders. It has also ordered for Ranaut to be compensated and has appointed a valuer to arrive at the quantum. If the Shiv Sena is aggrieved by Kangana Ranaut's statements it should fight a political battle with her. Misusing the power of the state to subjugate citizens is criminal.