oppn parties Fadnavis Sets Dangerous Precedent in ADHM Deal

News Snippets

  • Supreme Court questions the continuing relevance of two-child norms. The Court observed that falling fertility rates have weakened the population-control rationale behind laws disqualifying people with more than two children from contesting local body elections. It referred the issue to a larger Bench for consideration
  • Supreme Court declines to shift Tirupati laddu case outside Andhra Pradesh. The Court rejected a plea seeking transfer of the trial, despite arguments that political statements by Andhra Pradesh's Chief Minister and Deputy Chief Minister could affect the fairness of proceedings
  • Supreme Court transfers Azam Khan's fresh ED bail plea to Allahabad High Court. The apex court declined to consider the Samajwadi Party leader's bail request in a fresh Enforcement Directorate case and directed that it be listed before a division Bench of the High Court on November 16
  • Two killed in Delhi building collapse; contractor booked. Two bodies were recovered after a building collapsed in Chawri Bazaar. Delhi Chief Minister Rekha Gupta said the contractor had been booked and the concerned junior and assistant engineers suspended
  • Uttar Pradesh voter rolls show a 2.4-crore discrepancy. A difference of approximately 2.4 crore names has been reported between the state's panchayat and rural Assembly voter lists. The Election Commission has ordered the two sets of rolls to be matched
  • Gujarat announces 3% dearness allowance hike. The state government announced a three-percentage-point increase in dearness allowance for government employees and pensioners ahead of Diwali
  • Sensex and Nifty post their strongest single-day gains in months. The Sensex surged 2,008.61 points, or 2.60%, to close at 79,310.01, while the Nifty 50 climbed 576 points, or 2.40%, to 24,536.60. Financial and automobile stocks led the rally, supported by falling crude prices and renewed foreign investor buying
  • Maaya Rajeshwaran reaches WTA-level quarter-final. The 17-year-old Indian defeated Poland's Weronika Falkowska 6-4, 6-3, becoming the first Indian woman since Sania Mirza in 2012 to reach a quarter-final at a WTA Tour-level singles event
  • Tanvi Patri reaches Youth Olympics badminton final. The 15-year-old defeated Japan's Yuzuno Watanabe in the semi-final, assuring India of a medal and becoming the first Indian badminton player to reach the girls' singles final at the Youth Olympics
  • India beat Pakistan 3-2 in SAFF Championship. India defeated Pakistan in a closely contested match, having led 3-0 before conceding two late goals. The victory was reported as a significant result for India's second-string side
  • India beat Japan 4-1 to win a record sixth Asian Champions Trophy. India recovered from an early deficit to defeat Japan in the final at Mohali, extending its record as the tournament's most successful men's team
  • The Supreme Court issued notice to the Centre and the Election Commission on a petition challenging Section 16 of the Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners Act, 2023, which grants the CEC and Election Commissioners protection from legal proceedings for acts performed in their official duties. The petition argues that such blanket immunity could leave citizens without an effective remedy for alleged wrongdoing by the Commission
  • The Supreme Court told voters whose names were deleted from Delhi's draft electoral rolls not to be apprehensive about seeking re-enrolment through Form 6, after the Election Commission assured it that such applicants would not be prosecuted merely because their names had appeared in earlier rolls
  • Congress leader Rahul Gandhi opened the party's campaign for the 2027 Punjab Assembly elections with an Insaaf rally in Sangrur, Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann's home district, accusing the AAP government of failing to control drugs, gangster violence and corruption. Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge outlined six commitments, including a drug-free Punjab, protection of farmers, employment for young people and action against corruption
  • Rahul Gandhi accused the AAP government of running Punjab through a remote control from Delhi and questioned Bhagwant Mann's ability to tackle drug abuse, making personal allegations about the Chief Minister's conduct during their time together in Parliament
Stock markets on fire due to US results, Sensex gains 2008 points to reach its highest level in 8 months
oppn parties
Fadnavis Sets Dangerous Precedent in ADHM Deal

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2016-10-24 08:56:22

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Author of Cyber Scams in India, Digital Arrest, The Money Trap and The Human Hack
Ae Dil Hai Mushkil (ADHM) will release on 28th October as planned after all. A deal was brokered between Raj Thakeray and the producers of the film, including Karan Johar, by Maharashtra CM Devendra Fadnavis where the producers agreed to pay Rs 5 crore to Army Welfare Fund, show a clip eulogizing Uri martyrs before the film starts and give an undertaking that they will never again work with Pakistani artistes. With this, a sordid chapter involving political blackmail came to an end.

Make no mistake, even though Raj Thakeray and his political outfit Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) have little electoral presence (it got just 0.8 percent of votes in state elections), their mischief making potential is the strongest. They can mobilize thousands of weapon wielding cadre and destroy property, burn cinema halls and cause other public disturbance to bring the city of Mumbai and even large parts of Maharashtra to a standstill for as long as they wish. Ideally, it is the elected government of the state that is supposed to give protection to cinema halls screening the film for it has been passed by the Censors, the actors working were here on government sanctioned visa and the makers of the film had not broken any laws. But that is easy to say than do. Even if the government were to deploy massive police force to prevent the miscreants from causing disturbance, cine-goers would have still stayed away fearing riots.

That brings us to the second point. Were the producers of the film right in striking a deal with Thackeray? Their predicament was manifold. Film release dates are decided much in advance. Care is taken to avoid clashes between two big budget films. ADHM was as it is clashing with Ajay Devgan’s Shivay. If it was not released on 28th October, there was no certainty when it would have got the next release date. That would have indefinitely blocked huge funds on which interest has to be paid. The producers must have thought Rs 5 crore was a small sum compared to the losses they might suffer if the release was put off indefinitely. Their response was dictated purely by commercial considerations.

But the role of Devendra Fadnavis is something that needs to be closely examined. Instead of brokering a deal that smacks of blackmail, he could have politely, or even firmly, asked Thackeray to give up his protest as Karan Johar had already circulated a video (which some called groveling) in which he had apologized for casting Pakistani actors. He could have warned Thackeray that causing disturbance over the film on the streets would be firmly tackled by the government. He should not have bowed to this gross political blackmail. But since the Shiv Sena is increasingly critical of both the BJP and Fadnavis, the CM might have wanted to win an ally in MNS by giving him this leeway. In any case, what Fadnavis has done is set a bad precedent where anyone with a few goons will now hold the state to ransom and ask it to broker deals.

The Army, as usual, has come out with flying colours in this unsavoury episode. Immediately after the news of Rs 5 crore being extorted in its name came out in the press, Army Welfare Fund spokespersons made it known that the Army was not interested in such tainted funds. They said that all contributions to the said fund were purely voluntary and coercion was unethical and unwarranted. What will MNS do now? Will they collect the Rs 5 crore and distribute it among the families of Uri martyrs? Really, this is going too far and the Centre must do something about it. If anything is wrong, it should be banned as per law. But how can it become right by paying Rs 5 crore and why is this saffron collar extortion being allowed?