oppn parties Mecca Masjid Blasts Case: Disturbing Developments

News Snippets

  • Supreme Court questions the continuing relevance of two-child norms. The Court observed that falling fertility rates have weakened the population-control rationale behind laws disqualifying people with more than two children from contesting local body elections. It referred the issue to a larger Bench for consideration
  • Supreme Court declines to shift Tirupati laddu case outside Andhra Pradesh. The Court rejected a plea seeking transfer of the trial, despite arguments that political statements by Andhra Pradesh's Chief Minister and Deputy Chief Minister could affect the fairness of proceedings
  • Supreme Court transfers Azam Khan's fresh ED bail plea to Allahabad High Court. The apex court declined to consider the Samajwadi Party leader's bail request in a fresh Enforcement Directorate case and directed that it be listed before a division Bench of the High Court on November 16
  • Two killed in Delhi building collapse; contractor booked. Two bodies were recovered after a building collapsed in Chawri Bazaar. Delhi Chief Minister Rekha Gupta said the contractor had been booked and the concerned junior and assistant engineers suspended
  • Uttar Pradesh voter rolls show a 2.4-crore discrepancy. A difference of approximately 2.4 crore names has been reported between the state's panchayat and rural Assembly voter lists. The Election Commission has ordered the two sets of rolls to be matched
  • Gujarat announces 3% dearness allowance hike. The state government announced a three-percentage-point increase in dearness allowance for government employees and pensioners ahead of Diwali
  • Sensex and Nifty post their strongest single-day gains in months. The Sensex surged 2,008.61 points, or 2.60%, to close at 79,310.01, while the Nifty 50 climbed 576 points, or 2.40%, to 24,536.60. Financial and automobile stocks led the rally, supported by falling crude prices and renewed foreign investor buying
  • Maaya Rajeshwaran reaches WTA-level quarter-final. The 17-year-old Indian defeated Poland's Weronika Falkowska 6-4, 6-3, becoming the first Indian woman since Sania Mirza in 2012 to reach a quarter-final at a WTA Tour-level singles event
  • Tanvi Patri reaches Youth Olympics badminton final. The 15-year-old defeated Japan's Yuzuno Watanabe in the semi-final, assuring India of a medal and becoming the first Indian badminton player to reach the girls' singles final at the Youth Olympics
  • India beat Pakistan 3-2 in SAFF Championship. India defeated Pakistan in a closely contested match, having led 3-0 before conceding two late goals. The victory was reported as a significant result for India's second-string side
  • India beat Japan 4-1 to win a record sixth Asian Champions Trophy. India recovered from an early deficit to defeat Japan in the final at Mohali, extending its record as the tournament's most successful men's team
  • The Supreme Court issued notice to the Centre and the Election Commission on a petition challenging Section 16 of the Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners Act, 2023, which grants the CEC and Election Commissioners protection from legal proceedings for acts performed in their official duties. The petition argues that such blanket immunity could leave citizens without an effective remedy for alleged wrongdoing by the Commission
  • The Supreme Court told voters whose names were deleted from Delhi's draft electoral rolls not to be apprehensive about seeking re-enrolment through Form 6, after the Election Commission assured it that such applicants would not be prosecuted merely because their names had appeared in earlier rolls
  • Congress leader Rahul Gandhi opened the party's campaign for the 2027 Punjab Assembly elections with an Insaaf rally in Sangrur, Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann's home district, accusing the AAP government of failing to control drugs, gangster violence and corruption. Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge outlined six commitments, including a drug-free Punjab, protection of farmers, employment for young people and action against corruption
  • Rahul Gandhi accused the AAP government of running Punjab through a remote control from Delhi and questioned Bhagwant Mann's ability to tackle drug abuse, making personal allegations about the Chief Minister's conduct during their time together in Parliament
Stock markets on fire due to US results, Sensex gains 2008 points to reach its highest level in 8 months
oppn parties
Mecca Masjid Blasts Case: Disturbing Developments

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2018-04-17 18:10:22

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Author of Cyber Scams in India, Digital Arrest, The Money Trap and The Human Hack
The way investigations are conducted into and the way trials are undergone for high profile cases makes a mockery of law and the judicial process in India. It also shows the investigating agencies in very poor light. Instead of fairness, professionalism and transparency that should be the hallmark of any criminal investigation, these agencies like the ED, CBI, SFIO and NIA or the various SITÂ’s constituted for specific crimes, come across as biased arms of the government in power. This means that they will work overtime to nail those who are not in the good books of the ruling dispensation and weaken the case of those aligned with it.

Nothing else can explain how all the accused in the Mecca Masjid Dargah case got acquitted for want of clinching evidence against them. The case witnessed two distinctly different kinds of attitude by the NIA. Before 2014, when the NDA came to power, things were moving in one direction and it seemed that a tight case would be built to nail the accused. But post 2014, things started moving in a different direction. Witnesses turned hostile or retracted their statements, the NIA started to go-slow on matters and it seemed it was working to get the accused acquitted.

In the end, this is what happened. Swami Aseemanand and his co-accused will laugh their way to home as free men because the sloppy, and possibly compromised, NIA could not prove their crime. As Prime Minister Modi has said more than once but in a different context, there are no good or bad terrorists. Hence, terrorism by Hindutva outfits is as bad as that by Islamic radicals. But if acts of terror by Hindutva outfits go unpunished as investigating agencies weaken the cases then there is something seriously wrong with our country.

After 11 years, as the court has released all the accused, the bigger question is that if they did not do it, who did? The blasts were not the handiwork of isolated individuals. They were part of a conspiracy and the planning and execution must have involved a lot of people. Should we allow those criminals to roam free? What will happen of the case now? It is rumoured that the NIA is not going to appeal against the acquittals as it has been advised that the evidence is very weak. So will the perpetrators of that ghastly crime go unpunished? Will India never know who conspired to kill those innocents and sowed hatred among communities? Another disturbing factor in the case is the resignation of the judge who passed the acquittal order immediately after pronouncing the same. The whole case gives the impression of many things being fishy.