oppn parties Mecca Masjid Blasts Case: Disturbing Developments

News Snippets

  • NCLT initiates bankruptcy proceedings against former Videocon chairman Venugopal Dhoot for defaulting on loans of Rs 6158cr as personal guarantor in two group companies
  • LIC approves 1:1 bonus share issue
  • Gold and silver futures also go down by 0.7% and 2.2% respectively
  • Stocks tumbled again on Monday as crude prices rose: Sensex went down by 703 points and Nifty by 207 points
  • Supreme Court refuses to cancel the land-for-jobs FIR against Lalu Prasad
  • The spectre of El Nino haunts India: IMD predicts 'below normal ' monsoon this year
  • Labour protest over increase in wages by 35% (as per Haryana example) turns violent in Noida, nearly 200 were detained by the police
  • Congress leader Sonia Gandhi said that the delimitation exercise must be carried out after the Census is complete
  • PM Modi says Parliament is on the verge of creating history as the Houses get ready to take up the women's reservation bills
  • Tata Sons chairman N Chandrasekaran said that TCS COO Aarthi Subramanian is conducting a thorough inquiry to establish facts and identify individuals involved in the sexual harassment allegations at the company's Nashik office
  • Asha Bhonsle laid to rest with full state honours on Monday in Mumbai
  • AAP leader Arvind Kejriwal once again approached the Delhi HC to request the recusal of a judge from his case
  • Candidates Chess: R Vaishali on the verge of creating history, but needs two wins - one with black pieces - against formidable opponents to emerge as the challenger
  • Rohit Sharma, who retired hurt in the match versus RCB, underwent scans for possible hamstring injury
  • IPL: Abhishek Sharma fails for SRH but Ishan Kishan (91) shines. Then, Vaibhav Sooryavanshi fails for RR and SRH bolwers, especially unheralded Praful Hinge (4 for 24) and Sakib Hussain (4 for 24) win it for SRH. This was the first loss for table-toppers RR
Supreme Court questions Election Commission about SIR SOP and why logical discrepancy was introduced only in Bengal
oppn parties
Mecca Masjid Blasts Case: Disturbing Developments

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2018-04-17 18:10:22

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Author of Cyber Scams in India, Digital Arrest, The Money Trap and The Human Hack
The way investigations are conducted into and the way trials are undergone for high profile cases makes a mockery of law and the judicial process in India. It also shows the investigating agencies in very poor light. Instead of fairness, professionalism and transparency that should be the hallmark of any criminal investigation, these agencies like the ED, CBI, SFIO and NIA or the various SITÂ’s constituted for specific crimes, come across as biased arms of the government in power. This means that they will work overtime to nail those who are not in the good books of the ruling dispensation and weaken the case of those aligned with it.

Nothing else can explain how all the accused in the Mecca Masjid Dargah case got acquitted for want of clinching evidence against them. The case witnessed two distinctly different kinds of attitude by the NIA. Before 2014, when the NDA came to power, things were moving in one direction and it seemed that a tight case would be built to nail the accused. But post 2014, things started moving in a different direction. Witnesses turned hostile or retracted their statements, the NIA started to go-slow on matters and it seemed it was working to get the accused acquitted.

In the end, this is what happened. Swami Aseemanand and his co-accused will laugh their way to home as free men because the sloppy, and possibly compromised, NIA could not prove their crime. As Prime Minister Modi has said more than once but in a different context, there are no good or bad terrorists. Hence, terrorism by Hindutva outfits is as bad as that by Islamic radicals. But if acts of terror by Hindutva outfits go unpunished as investigating agencies weaken the cases then there is something seriously wrong with our country.

After 11 years, as the court has released all the accused, the bigger question is that if they did not do it, who did? The blasts were not the handiwork of isolated individuals. They were part of a conspiracy and the planning and execution must have involved a lot of people. Should we allow those criminals to roam free? What will happen of the case now? It is rumoured that the NIA is not going to appeal against the acquittals as it has been advised that the evidence is very weak. So will the perpetrators of that ghastly crime go unpunished? Will India never know who conspired to kill those innocents and sowed hatred among communities? Another disturbing factor in the case is the resignation of the judge who passed the acquittal order immediately after pronouncing the same. The whole case gives the impression of many things being fishy.