oppn parties NIA Act Amendment Bill: Necessary To Counter New-Age Terrorism

News Snippets

  • Defence minister Rajnath Singh says India might revise its policy of "no first use" of nuclear weapons in national interest
  • Ravi Sashtri to remain head coach of Team India fro another two years
  • India defends move on Article 370, says entirely an internal matter
  • UN holds closed door meet on Kashmir but China fails in its attempt to censure India
  • Limited public transport service to be restored in J&K from this weekend
  • Educational institutions to reopen in phases from Monday in J&K
  • Government decides to restore telecommunications in phases in J&K starting with landline phones this weekend
  • PM Modi announces that India will have a Chief of Defence Staff soon
  • PM Modi says government worried about population explosion, will introduce schemes to control it
  • Prime Minister Modi explains the decision to read down Article 370 in his address to the nation on the occasion of Independence Day
  • All 6 accused in Pehlu Khan lynching case acquitted
  • Cricketers will now be tested for dope as BCCI decides to come under NADA after a prod from the government
  • NDTV promoters Prannoy and Radhika Roy prevented from travelling abroad. Channel says it amounts to subversion of media freedom
  • TMC spokesman Derek O'Brien questioned for two hours by the CBI on the party mouthpiece 'Jago Bangla'
  • Former finance minister Arun Jaitley has been admitted to AIIMS for breathing problems. His condition is said to be stable
India Commentary wishes all its readers a very Happy Independence Day. Jai Hind
oppn parties
NIA Act Amendment Bill: Necessary To Counter New-Age Terrorism

By Linus Garg

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Linus tackles things head-on. He takes sides in his analysis and it fits excellently with our editorial policy. No 'maybe's' and 'allegedly' for him, only things in black and white.

The bill to amend the National Investigative Agency Act was passed by the Lok Sabha after a division vote. Normally, government bills do not necessitate a division but are passed by a voice vote. But since AIMIM MP Asaddudin Owaisi got into a verbal duel with home minister Amit Shah over the amendments and insisted on a division, the vote took place. Shah was quick to seize the moment to say that it is better to have a vote as it will show who is against national security.

 

During the debate, Owaisi was supported by the Congress and other parties which said that NDA government would misuse the law to target some people and communities. They said that India will turn into a "police state".Shah countered by saying that terrorism has no religion and the government will never misuse the law. But since the NDA government has been hyper-sensitive over the definition of nationalism, has been using the sedition law quite liberally and its agencies have diluted cases against several people involved in the so-called "Hindu terror", concerns remain over the misuse of the law.

 

But do the present amendments have anything to do with the misuse? The law could be misused as it stood, even before amending it. The NIA has ample powers to harass targeted people if the government wants. The current amendments are only to fine-tune the law and make it up to date by adding several new areas such as human trafficking, circulation of fake currency and sale of prohibited arms among others, which can be investigated by the NIA. It focuses on the matters of cybercrime, something which terrorists are increasingly resorting to. Maybe Owaisi is concerned about the proviso that seeks to declare suspected individuals as terrorists (as opposed to organizations till now), but since one-man armies are not uncommon now, this proviso has to be there. Only, it has to be used with utmost care.

 

When it came to voting on the bill, no party voted against it. The bill was passed with only 6 votes against it, comprising mainly of AIMIM and individual MPs. This proves that all major political parties want the NIA to be given more powers to investigate terror crimes. Concerns over misuse should be addressed by the parties by remaining vigilant and by not allowing the government of the day to play a partisan role.