oppn parties Prajwal Revanna Abuse Videos: Identities Disclosed, The Victims Suffer Again

News Snippets

  • Government to introduce PF for self-emplyed and gig workers
  • Crush at Puri Rathyatra leaves 2 dead and 78 injured
  • NEET-UG, marred in controversy due to pape4r leak, saw a huge increase in top scores as two scored 715/720 and 11.2 lkah candidates cleared the exam
  • India's first hydrogen-powered train will be flagged off by PM Modi from Jind in Haryana
  • Delhi HC asks the government to monitor Sona Wnagchuk's health regularly
  • TMC Rajya Sabha MP Koel Mallick resigns from her seat, leaves TMC. Mamata asks all those wishing to leave the party to do so before July 21
  • Calcutta HC says land deed is not a proof of citizenship. Refuses to provide protection to a man facing deportation on basis of land deed
  • Supreme Court tells the government to teach the third language in the 3-language formula in Class 6 and not Class 9
  • Government to take steps to boost liquidity for small businesses
  • RBI says that banks cannot sell seized assets back to the defaulters
  • Centre decides to take equity stakes in semiconductor startups
  • Markets remain flat on Thursday: Sensex closes just 1 point ahead and Nifty ended 5 point lower
  • BCCI:Selectors have possibly decided that Rohit Sharma will not be selected for ODIs after the Lord's game on Sunday
  • Japan Open badminton: P V Sindhu stuns world no. 5 Han Yue of China 21-16, 21-14 to enter the quarterfinals
  • 2nd ODI versus England: Indian batting fails miserably except Gill, Kohli and Iyer to score just 233 all out. England win by 4 wickets
Supreme Court clarifies that it has not issued a blanket ban on use of bulldozers, and they can be used after compliance with procedure laid down in civil laws
oppn parties
Prajwal Revanna Abuse Videos: Identities Disclosed, The Victims Suffer Again

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2024-05-07 07:12:05

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Author of Cyber Scams in India, Digital Arrest, The Money Trap and The Human Hack

The most important and disastrous fallout of the leaking of the videos of Prajwal Revanna's sexual offences has been the disclosure of the identities of the victims. In the case Nipun Saxena vs Union of India, the Supreme Court had ruled that the identities of victims of rape and sexual molestation/harassment cases must not be disclosed in any manner. This ruling was made to protect their dignity as the court recognized that instead of the perpetrator, society chose to stigmatize the victim. But in the instant case, the video clips have been made available to all and sundry through their targeted distribution in pen drives (containing the offending videos) that were handed out to random persons in public places in Hassan. Thereafter, these videos went viral on social media. The identity of the women in the videos was in public domain and they had to flee their homes to escape the unwanted glare from society and, possibly, retribution from the influential Deve Gowda clan. One woman was allegedly kidnapped and held captive in the farmhouse of an aide of Prajwal's father, JD(S) MLA H D Revanna, to prevent her from approaching the SIT. She was rescued by Karnataka Police and H D Revanna has already been arrested.

Without guessing who had distributed the pen drives containing the offending videos for what gain (which in times of election is easy to guess), it will suffice to say that they are equally guilty of demeaning women. The Congress is in power in Karnataka. It must do all it can to bring Prajwal Revanna to justice for his ghastly crimes and abuse of power. But it must also take steps to stop the circulation of the videos. For the women whose identities are being disclosed in these videos, the torture will continue for their entire life. Most of them are from lower middle class families and they will be uprooted from their homes. Their lives will not be the same ever again. If the Karnataka government had wanted, it could have taken immediate steps to stop the circulation of the videos on social media. In fact, it was bound by law to do so. It could have used Section 228A of the IPC and Sections 66E and 67A of the IT Act to proceed against the miscreants. But it failed miserably. In the political slugfest that ensued after the disclosures, most politicians chose to treat the matter as a law and order issue and forgot about the victims. The women in the videos are the ones who are suffering again now.