oppn parties Pune: Social Boycott For Refusing To Prove Virginity

News Snippets

  • Government to introduce PF for self-emplyed and gig workers
  • Crush at Puri Rathyatra leaves 2 dead and 78 injured
  • NEET-UG, marred in controversy due to pape4r leak, saw a huge increase in top scores as two scored 715/720 and 11.2 lkah candidates cleared the exam
  • India's first hydrogen-powered train will be flagged off by PM Modi from Jind in Haryana
  • Delhi HC asks the government to monitor Sona Wnagchuk's health regularly
  • TMC Rajya Sabha MP Koel Mallick resigns from her seat, leaves TMC. Mamata asks all those wishing to leave the party to do so before July 21
  • Calcutta HC says land deed is not a proof of citizenship. Refuses to provide protection to a man facing deportation on basis of land deed
  • Supreme Court tells the government to teach the third language in the 3-language formula in Class 6 and not Class 9
  • Government to take steps to boost liquidity for small businesses
  • RBI says that banks cannot sell seized assets back to the defaulters
  • Centre decides to take equity stakes in semiconductor startups
  • Markets remain flat on Thursday: Sensex closes just 1 point ahead and Nifty ended 5 point lower
  • BCCI:Selectors have possibly decided that Rohit Sharma will not be selected for ODIs after the Lord's game on Sunday
  • Japan Open badminton: P V Sindhu stuns world no. 5 Han Yue of China 21-16, 21-14 to enter the quarterfinals
  • 2nd ODI versus England: Indian batting fails miserably except Gill, Kohli and Iyer to score just 233 all out. England win by 4 wickets
Supreme Court clarifies that it has not issued a blanket ban on use of bulldozers, and they can be used after compliance with procedure laid down in civil laws
oppn parties
Pune: Social Boycott For Refusing To Prove Virginity

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2018-10-17 15:35:20

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Author of Cyber Scams in India, Digital Arrest, The Money Trap and The Human Hack
In an act that should be strongly condemned by all right thinking people, a woman has been subjected to social boycott and made to leave a Navratri dandiya venue just because she refused to bow to her community’s jat panchayat. Aishwarya Tamaichikar married Vivek last year. As per 'custom' in their community, the jat panchayat wanted to see their bedsheet the morning after they consummated their marriage as proof of her virginity. Vivek and Aishwarya both refused to comply with the diktat. But when they started supporting a “Stop the V test” campaign started by another woman, they were subjected to social boycott by the panchayat from May this year.

The reprisal started soon thereafter. Aishwarya was assaulted by some panchayat members when she had gone to attend a wedding. That she was invited to the wedding was proof that other community members did not support the panchayat initiated boycott. Yet, the panchayat members assaulted her to scare other community members and ensure that their boycott was implemented. Now, she was asked to leave a dandiya show. The music was stopped and an announcement was made that it would not start if some people did not leave the venue. The music was started only after she left.

This is arm twisting of the worst kind. The panchayat is following a regressive custom that neither has any scientific basis nor social sanction. First of all, virginity cannot be proved or disproved by a few drops of blood on the bedsheet. Then, it is a very private matter between the husband and the wife and no one, including the panchayat, has the right to violate this privacy. The panchayat must know that the hymen can break before sexual intercourse due to multiple reasons and science says that its breakage is no conclusive proof that the girl has had sexual intercourse. But that is secondary. Why should the panchayat poke its nose in the private affairs of a couple? Who gives them the right to demand such an obnoxious thing as to see the bedsheet the morning after? Further, why are only women subjected to such tests to prove their “purity”?

It is good that Aishwarya has filed an FIR and the Pune police have booked 8 members of the community by invoking the Social Boycott (Prevention, Prohibition, and Redressal) Act, 2016. It has launched a manhunt for them. But Aishwarya had filed an FIR when she was assaulted at the wedding too. The police had arrested the culprits then too but they were released on bail. Nothing has come out of that case. Hence, this time the police and the administration must ensure that the full force of law is applied to punish the panchayat members. There is an urgent need to stop this organized parallel justice system that runs in India in order to respect the privacy of the individual and restore his/her dignity.