oppn parties Raj Thackeray Is Not Above The Law

News Snippets

  • In reply to a question in Parliament, the government says it is empowered to lawfully intercept, monitor or decrpyt information stored in a computer resource in the interest of sovereignty or integrity of India
  • Police stop a 12-year old girl on her way to the Sabarimala shrine
  • In Karnataka, the JD(S) indicates that it might support the BJP government if it falls short of numbers after the bypolls
  • Congress pips the BJP in local body elections in Rajasthan, winning 961 wards to the BJPs 737
  • After Airtel and Vodafone-Idea, Jio also indicates that tariffs will be raised from December
  • Sources in Shiv Sena say that they might revive the alliance with the BJP if it offers the 50:50 deal
  • A miffed Sanjay Rout of the Shiv Sena says that it will take "100 births" to understand Sharad Pawar
  • Mobile operators Vodafone-Idea and Airtel decide to raise tariffs from next month
  • Sharad Pawar meets Sonia Gandhi and says more time needed for government formation in Maharashtra
  • Justice S A Bobde sworn in as the 47th Chief Justice of India
  • Supreme Court holds hotels liable for theft of vehicle from their parking area if parked by valet, says "owner's risk" clause is not a shield from such liability
  • Finance Minister says she is receiving feedback from many sectors that recovery is happening as there is lower stress
  • Sabarimala temple opens, but police bar the entry of women below 50 years
  • Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman says Air India and BPCL to be sold off by March
  • Media person Rajat Sharma resigns as DDCA president
Two Muslim litigants in Ayodhya refuse to accept the Supreme Court order, say review petition might be filed
oppn parties
Raj Thackeray Is Not Above The Law

By Sunil Garodia

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Writes for a number of publications.

Whenever there is a discussion on law and legal system, people always use the age-old cliche to say "the law is same for everybody". But at least in India, they should either define "everybody" or add that it is so only theoretically. One says this because every time there is an investigation in a major financial or government scam and people who are arrested name any politician and if the investigating agencies issue a summon to him or her, the politician concerned, his party and his cronies start protesting, take out rallies and call bandhs. The summons issued to Raj Thackeray of Maharashtra Navanirman Sena (MNS) now and the response of the party to make its protest a show of strength in front of the ED office in Mumbai is just the latest in such drama. The TMC always protests when its leaders are called to explain their dealings in the chit-fund scams. There were widespread protests and violence when Lalu Yadav and Jayalalitha were convicted too.

Do these politicians mean to say that they are above the law? Or that if their name comes up during investigation in a scam, the investigating agency should ignore it? Or that there are laws in India which prevent such investigating agencies to issue summons to them? Calling such summons political vendetta or witch hunt every time will not do. This is not to say that investigating agencies are not used to harass political opponents. But that is sometimes, not always. If Raj Thackeray was an investor in Kohinoor CTNL in which IL&FS group had substantial investments and if Thackeray exited the company just after IL&FS booked a loss by selling its shares in Kohinoor, the scent of insider information being passed on to him is very strong. The ED is right to summon him to present his side of the story. Thackeray has nothing to fear if it was purely a business decision. But if he had helped IL&FS launder money in any way, he should now be prepared to bear the consequences. He should not, and should not be allowed to, use his political clout to hide his financial misdeeds.

The law is not the same for everybody in India. For politicians, for the well-connected person, for the ultra-rich and for the politically empowered class, rules are bent and investigations are often handled in a particular way to either let them off the hook or minimize the guilt. The first reaction of a common man or woman in India on hearing about some politicians name coming up in a scam is that "oh nothing will happen, for some days it will be front-page news but later everything will be brushed under the carpet". Why does the common man react this way? It is because seldom does one see convictions in such scams and even if there are convictions, they are of small fries. Except for Lalu Prasad and Jayalalitha, no current leader of any worthwhile standing has been convicted in the recent past. There is a strong perception on the ground that it is all a charade and politicians often keep up the appearance by starting cases when in power but actually, the "you scratch my back and I will scratch yours" principle is followed and no one is ever convicted as the cases drag on for years.

But the way politicians behave when they are summoned in any case is awful. They try to show that they are cleaner than the Ganga (although the holy river, too, is not clean anymore as it bears the collective misdeeds of those who swear by her name) when the people know that one cannot find an honest politician in the country. People know that some make money for themselves while others do it for the party. But it is also corruption to take money (or protection money, if you will, for most people pay out of fear) for the party by issuing veiled threats, which some politicians, who claim to be clean, do. In case of others like Raj Thackeray, the connection between his investments in the corporate world and his clout in Mumbai is too apparent. If he has used his political clout and connections to help any company or its promoters to do anything illegal, he should now answer the charges instead of creating a disturbance. He is not above the law.