oppn parties Why Service Charge for Bad Service?

News Snippets

  • Supreme Court questions the continuing relevance of two-child norms. The Court observed that falling fertility rates have weakened the population-control rationale behind laws disqualifying people with more than two children from contesting local body elections. It referred the issue to a larger Bench for consideration
  • Supreme Court declines to shift Tirupati laddu case outside Andhra Pradesh. The Court rejected a plea seeking transfer of the trial, despite arguments that political statements by Andhra Pradesh's Chief Minister and Deputy Chief Minister could affect the fairness of proceedings
  • Supreme Court transfers Azam Khan's fresh ED bail plea to Allahabad High Court. The apex court declined to consider the Samajwadi Party leader's bail request in a fresh Enforcement Directorate case and directed that it be listed before a division Bench of the High Court on November 16
  • Two killed in Delhi building collapse; contractor booked. Two bodies were recovered after a building collapsed in Chawri Bazaar. Delhi Chief Minister Rekha Gupta said the contractor had been booked and the concerned junior and assistant engineers suspended
  • Uttar Pradesh voter rolls show a 2.4-crore discrepancy. A difference of approximately 2.4 crore names has been reported between the state's panchayat and rural Assembly voter lists. The Election Commission has ordered the two sets of rolls to be matched
  • Gujarat announces 3% dearness allowance hike. The state government announced a three-percentage-point increase in dearness allowance for government employees and pensioners ahead of Diwali
  • Sensex and Nifty post their strongest single-day gains in months. The Sensex surged 2,008.61 points, or 2.60%, to close at 79,310.01, while the Nifty 50 climbed 576 points, or 2.40%, to 24,536.60. Financial and automobile stocks led the rally, supported by falling crude prices and renewed foreign investor buying
  • Maaya Rajeshwaran reaches WTA-level quarter-final. The 17-year-old Indian defeated Poland's Weronika Falkowska 6-4, 6-3, becoming the first Indian woman since Sania Mirza in 2012 to reach a quarter-final at a WTA Tour-level singles event
  • Tanvi Patri reaches Youth Olympics badminton final. The 15-year-old defeated Japan's Yuzuno Watanabe in the semi-final, assuring India of a medal and becoming the first Indian badminton player to reach the girls' singles final at the Youth Olympics
  • India beat Pakistan 3-2 in SAFF Championship. India defeated Pakistan in a closely contested match, having led 3-0 before conceding two late goals. The victory was reported as a significant result for India's second-string side
  • India beat Japan 4-1 to win a record sixth Asian Champions Trophy. India recovered from an early deficit to defeat Japan in the final at Mohali, extending its record as the tournament's most successful men's team
  • The Supreme Court issued notice to the Centre and the Election Commission on a petition challenging Section 16 of the Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners Act, 2023, which grants the CEC and Election Commissioners protection from legal proceedings for acts performed in their official duties. The petition argues that such blanket immunity could leave citizens without an effective remedy for alleged wrongdoing by the Commission
  • The Supreme Court told voters whose names were deleted from Delhi's draft electoral rolls not to be apprehensive about seeking re-enrolment through Form 6, after the Election Commission assured it that such applicants would not be prosecuted merely because their names had appeared in earlier rolls
  • Congress leader Rahul Gandhi opened the party's campaign for the 2027 Punjab Assembly elections with an Insaaf rally in Sangrur, Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann's home district, accusing the AAP government of failing to control drugs, gangster violence and corruption. Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge outlined six commitments, including a drug-free Punjab, protection of farmers, employment for young people and action against corruption
  • Rahul Gandhi accused the AAP government of running Punjab through a remote control from Delhi and questioned Bhagwant Mann's ability to tackle drug abuse, making personal allegations about the Chief Minister's conduct during their time together in Parliament
Stock markets on fire due to US results, Sensex gains 2008 points to reach its highest level in 8 months
oppn parties
Why Service Charge for Bad Service?

By admin
First publised on 2017-01-03 13:27:05

About the Author

Sunil Garodia By our team of in-house writers.
People are talking about restaurant bills now. With the government saying that the service charge (as distinct from service tax, which has to be paid mandatorily) component should be optional – that a customer should pay only if he or she gets service of an expected quality, otherwise they can ask the eatery to revise the bill, the people have started talking about their horrible experiences in renowned restaurants where they were forced to pay 20% service charge on food bills despite getting atrocious service. Trade bodies of restaurants have retorted by saying that they will continue with the service charge and have haughtily added that patrons are welcome not to visit if they do not wish to pay the same.

Restaurants add various charges on their bills. One such is establishment charges. Taking the plea that they are providing diners with plush seating, lavish décor and air-conditioning, eateries charge a premium of anywhere between 200 to 500 percent on bottled water and branded soft drinks on the maximum retail price. If one carries one’s own drinking water, many times eateries do not provide empty glasses for the same. People have long resented this.

Logic provides that if a business is being run as a sit-down fine dining place, the price of food must cover all overheads the entrepreneur incurs. If dishes are priced upwards of Rs 350 for a portion, the waiter who serves the dishes must get his salary from that. Levying additional charges is abominable. Restaurants are already talking about how prices will be upwardly revised if they are not allowed to charge for service.

But keeping the service charge component optional is sure to start many ugly fights in restaurants. The best way would be for eateries to prominently display a board saying “this restaurant levies XX% service charge on its bill” and leave it to the diner whether he wishes to eat there or not. The same message should be prominently printed on all pages of the menu instead of being relegated to a small, 7 point line at the bottom. Many patrons end up leaving tips even after paying service charge in the bill as they do not know they have been charged separately for the service.