oppn parties Social Media Platforms Must Be Made Accountable

News Snippets

  • Supreme Court says all cases of mob violence and lynchings should not be given a communal angle
  • Supreme Court tells petitioners who want elections to be held with ballot papers as they fear EVM tampering to back their claims of tampering with data
  • PM Modi says he is indebted to the Constitution which is an article of paith for his party
  • Mamata Banerjee says people do not have freedom to eat what they want under NDA then how can they have freedom to speak
  • Bengal, wary of clashes on Ramnavami, has tightened security all over the state, especially in pockets that witnessed such clashes in previous years
  • Ramdev and Balkrishna of Patanjali offered apology to the Supreme Court for misleading advertisement with folded hands. The apex court had earlier said their apology was not worth the paper it was written on
  • A whistleblower has claimed that China bribed senior UN officials to keep the lab leak angle out of reasons for spread of Covid
  • Two men from Bihar were arrested from Gujarat for firing at actor Salman Khan's home on Sunday morning. Mumbai Police said they wanted to kill the actor
  • Supreme Court order West Bengal governor to appoint VCs to six universities from the names provided by the state government in one week
  • Wow! Momo raises Rs 70cr from Z3Partners in the latest round of funding
  • IMF raises India's growth forecast from 6.5% earlier to 6.8%
  • Re plunges to a new low of 83.54 per dollar as global tensions mount
  • Stocks remain weak and negative on Tuesday: Sensex plunges 456 points to 72943 and Nifty 124 points to 22147
  • Candidates' Chess: D Gukesh draws with Ian Nepomniachtchi and with six points each, both reamin joint leaders. Pragg also drew with Vidit Gujrathi
  • IPL: Table-toppers RR beat KKR by 2 wickets
Encounter at Kanker in Bastar in Chhatisgarh: 29 Maoists, including 3 'senior commanders' gunned down by security forces
oppn parties
Social Media Platforms Must Be Made Accountable

By Linus Garg
First publised on 2020-06-26 08:52:01

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Linus tackles things head-on. He takes sides in his analysis and it fits excellently with our editorial policy. No 'maybe's' and 'allegedly' for him, only things in black and white.

Is totally unfettered and unaccountable social media in anyone's interest? It is true that these platforms provide a channel of expression to the ordinary citizen, but how many such ordinary citizens are the originators of most of the content that makes its way to these platforms? It is also true that many incidents are now being first reported by the so-called citizen reporter who is accidentally or fortunately present at the scene. But that is very infrequent.

Most of the time, dedicated, targeted, morphed, slanted and often mischievous and fake information, opinion and 'news' are 'created' in the form of written words, graphics, videos, memes and more by interested persons and published in such a manner that it reaches a wide audience. Unsuspecting citizens, not knowing the origin and believing it because it is forwarded by someone known to them, keep on forwarding it to make it viral. After that, the WhatsApp University takes over and a large number of people are brainwashed to the extent of starting riots or worse.

If a print publication or a television channel (or even a digital media platform) were to publish such news or opinion, it would immediately be held accountable under a plethora of laws. Then why not apply the same strict laws to social media platforms? In the US, President Donald Trump has already said that he would take internet companies out of the ambit of the protection granted by Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. This section protects internet companies as they are not deemed publishers of user-generated content. This is a step in the right direction as it will bring internet companies at par with the traditional media.

In an editorial, The Economic Times has argued that internet companies should be made to store content posted by users based in India on servers located in India. It suggested that social media companies working in India must follow all India laws and must remove content identified as mala fide within a given time frame once they are informed about it. It calls for a level playing field for all media - traditional as well as new age. This is a sane and logical suggestion and the government must work to implement it.