oppn parties Speeding Limousines: Thrill That Kills

News Snippets

  • RBI may keep rates unchanged in the June MPC meeting
  • Stock markets are expected to rally stringly in view of exit poll predictions of NDA win
  • T20 WC: South Africa face Sri Lanka today
  • T20 WC: WI beat Papua New Guinea by 5 wickets
  • PM Modi says anti-India forces are against him but he will not bend
  • Campaigning ends for the 6th and penultimate phase of polling for the 2024 general elections. Voting on Saturday, May 25
  • Arvind Kejriwal waits at home but Delhi cops did not turn up to question him and his family in the Swati Maliwal case
  • Delhi HC denies bail to Manish Sisodia, says non-recovery of cash not a proof that there was no corruption
  • H D Deve Gowda asks his grandson Prajwal Revanna, accused in rape and sexual molestation cases, to return to India or face his anger
  • Kolkata cops search for Bangladeshi MP Anwarul Azim Anar's chopped body parts in Bangar, near Kolkata. The MP was murdered in an apartment complex in New Town, Kolkata by opponents from bangladesh who hired a contract killer for the job
  • Clashes break out in Bengal's Nandigram as a BJP worker's mother is killed by miscreants
  • Google in talks with Foxconn to make Pixel phones and drones from plant near Chennai
  • Survey by S&P Global shows that business activity was robust in May and job creation was highest in 18 years
  • Indigo reports Rs 1895cr profit in Q4 last fiscal, and nearly $ 1bn in FY23-24, a record for Indian carriers. Proposes business class in busiest and busy routes
  • Stocks on fire on Thursday after initial uncertainty: Sensex gains 1196 points to 75418 and Nifty 369 points to 22967
Counting of votes today as Modi eyes historic third term while the INDIA bloc wishes to prevent that /////// Stocks on fire as markets bat for policy continuity
oppn parties
Speeding Limousines: Thrill That Kills

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2016-04-07 23:49:04

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator.
Two news items, separated by a day, caught the eye because both involved road accidents by speeding limousines – one by a Volkswagen and another by a Mercedes, one in Delhi and the other near Mumbai. In both accidents, people were killed. In Mumbai, a six year old and his grandfather were mowed down while in Delhi a 33 year old man was flung nearly 15 feet in the air before landing to his death. In a similar accident in January in Kolkata, an Air Force corporal on Republic Day parade rehearsal duty was killed by a speeding Audi being driven by the son of a ‘leader’ of the ruling party in Bengal. Salman Khan’s case is still fresh in public memory.

What is it between limousines and road accidents? Is it because the rich, spoilt and often under-aged brat driving the car is drunk on alcohol, high on drugs or drunk on the invisible but omnipotent power of his daddy’s wealth and connections? Or is it because the driver is unable to drive the high power car within speed limits? Or is it because it is in their DNA to break rules? Invariably, they turn to their loyal chauffeurs to get them out of the mess. Sometimes they succeed in convincing the poor man with a fortune. When they are unable to do so, they bribe the police to weaken the case or hire hot shot lawyers to pick holes in the case and get them acquitted. Rarely are they handed out exemplary punishment.

The connection between speed and accidents that kill is well established. A study had shown that cars driving at about 40 kmph have just 10% chance of killing someone in an accident while those driving at 90 kmph will kill someone they hit 90 times out of 100. It is not without reason that speed limits are set in most areas. But the thrill of driving at a speed of over 100 kmph is facilitated by powerful cars and availed by those who have no concern for both their own and others’ safety. So should we ban these monster limousines? That would be throwing out the baby with the bathwater. Why spoil the party for those who have the moolah to invest in such status symbols?

We need to think out of the box. If any one of a family is suspected to be involved in a speeding and killing case, in addition to the punishment handed out in court or even if the person walks free, the whole family should be prevented from owning or driving cars above certain horse power. The fear of losing the pleasure of owning status symbols will automatically restrain the pressure of the foot on the accelerator. Parents will think thrice before giving keys of such cars to brats. One knows that this is too radical an idea to be implemented, but is there a law against wishful thinking?