oppn parties The Partha Chatterjee Case: Whose Money Is It?

News Snippets

  • Government to introduce PF for self-emplyed and gig workers
  • Crush at Puri Rathyatra leaves 2 dead and 78 injured
  • NEET-UG, marred in controversy due to pape4r leak, saw a huge increase in top scores as two scored 715/720 and 11.2 lkah candidates cleared the exam
  • India's first hydrogen-powered train will be flagged off by PM Modi from Jind in Haryana
  • Delhi HC asks the government to monitor Sona Wnagchuk's health regularly
  • TMC Rajya Sabha MP Koel Mallick resigns from her seat, leaves TMC. Mamata asks all those wishing to leave the party to do so before July 21
  • Calcutta HC says land deed is not a proof of citizenship. Refuses to provide protection to a man facing deportation on basis of land deed
  • Supreme Court tells the government to teach the third language in the 3-language formula in Class 6 and not Class 9
  • Government to take steps to boost liquidity for small businesses
  • RBI says that banks cannot sell seized assets back to the defaulters
  • Centre decides to take equity stakes in semiconductor startups
  • Markets remain flat on Thursday: Sensex closes just 1 point ahead and Nifty ended 5 point lower
  • BCCI:Selectors have possibly decided that Rohit Sharma will not be selected for ODIs after the Lord's game on Sunday
  • Japan Open badminton: P V Sindhu stuns world no. 5 Han Yue of China 21-16, 21-14 to enter the quarterfinals
  • 2nd ODI versus England: Indian batting fails miserably except Gill, Kohli and Iyer to score just 233 all out. England win by 4 wickets
Supreme Court clarifies that it has not issued a blanket ban on use of bulldozers, and they can be used after compliance with procedure laid down in civil laws
oppn parties
The Partha Chatterjee Case: Whose Money Is It?

By Linus Garg
First publised on 2022-08-01 08:18:21

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Linus tackles things head-on. He takes sides in his analysis and it fits excellently with our editorial policy. No 'maybe's' and 'allegedly' for him, only things in black and white.

Partha Chatterjee, former West Bengal minister and senior TMC leader, accused in the SSC recruitment scam in the state, vehemently denied that the cash and gold recovered from the flats of his close aide Arpita Mukherjee belonged to him. He said thrice in Bengali "amar noy, amar noy, amar noy" (not mine, not mine, not mine) immediately raising the question who he was trying to blame. Chatterjee had earlier also said that he was being implicated in a conspiracy. Political circles in the state are abuzz with rumours and people are wondering who Chatterjee is trying to blame.

The events as they have unfolded show a very interesting chronology. That the Enforcement Directorate (ED) had raided Arpita Mukherjee's flat and recovered huge cash, gold and property papers was known to all on the day ED officials chose to visit Chatterjee's house to question him in a marathon session. As soon as the cash and other valuables were recovered and seized, TMC spokesmen issued statements saying the party had nothing to do with the amount seized and Arpita Mukherjee was not a party member. Later, when Chatterjee was arrested and he allegedly called Mamata Banerjee past midnight, she did not receive his calls. When more cash was recovered a couple of days later from another flat, TMC once again distanced itself from the seizure.

Later when Chatterjee was removed as minister and suspended from the party, he started saying that he was being framed as part of a conspiracy. Now, after 7 days, he has said that the seized money does not belong to him. Arpita, on the other hand, has said that she did not know what Chatterjee stored in the rooms in her flat as she was not given the keys to those rooms and not allowed inside. It was only Chatterjee who used to open those rooms. So if now Chatterjee says that the money does not belong to him, whose money was he storing in those rooms and on whose behest was he acting as the keeper of the stash?

The TMC has rightly questioned his silence in the initial days and his denial now. But it could be that when Chatterjee was arrested, he had hopes that the party would bail him out of the tricky situation. When he was removed as minister and suspended from the party, he knew he was on his own and started making allegations about the conspiracy and fact that the money did not belong to him. Whatever the situation, the fact is that the SCC scam did happen and that is proved by the fact that there are many witnesses who have said they paid money to get the jobs. ED has also allegedly recovered notes, some of them allegedly on the letterhead of the then education minister, about names of people given jobs and the amount they paid.  Money did change hands and the huge amount recovered till now from the accused shows that it was a massive scam. Although the TMC can say that Partha Chatterjee was the mastermind, still he was the education minister then and it is strange that the party did not get a whiff of what he was up to. For now, the TMC has done damage control by removing Chatterjee but if more skeletons tumble out then the party will be further embarrassed.