By Our Editorial Team
First publised on 2026-07-10 01:16:52
A pattern is now visible in Mamata Banerjee's conduct since losing power.
In May, after her nephew Abhishek Banerjee was attacked by a mob in Sonarpur, Banerjee was recorded berating the CEO of Belle Vue Hospital in front of staff. "You should be ashamed of yourself," she told him. "Tomorrow, if the central government is not there, we will take care of all this." It is not simply anger at a hospital administrator. It is a threat built on the premise that political power, hers or her party's, will eventually return to settle scores. BJP called it an attempt to pressure a private institution using political muscle rather than medical facts. The audio's authenticity was not independently confirmed, and TMC disputed the framing, so this incident carries more uncertainty than what followed in July.
In July, at a protest march, she struck her own party worker in public.
Different settings, different targets, but the same underlying posture: an expectation of deference that the ballot box has already withdrawn. As Chief Minister, that posture was backed by actual authority over hospitals, police, and administration. As an opposition leader marching under a court order, it is not. The gap between the authority she is used to exercising and the authority she now holds is where both incidents sit.
That gap is the story. It is about a leader and a party still operating on institutional reflexes built over more than a decade in power, not yet recalibrated to opposition. It raises real questions about accountability, and about whether TMC's culture of command has outlived TMC's hold on office. A party that governed by instinct for so long does not shed that instinct the day the results come in. A threat in May and a slap in July suggest it hasn't shed it yet.








