oppn parties US Versus China: President Trump And The Intelligence Establishment Differ In Their Opinion

News Snippets

  • NCLT initiates bankruptcy proceedings against former Videocon chairman Venugopal Dhoot for defaulting on loans of Rs 6158cr as personal guarantor in two group companies
  • LIC approves 1:1 bonus share issue
  • Gold and silver futures also go down by 0.7% and 2.2% respectively
  • Stocks tumbled again on Monday as crude prices rose: Sensex went down by 703 points and Nifty by 207 points
  • Supreme Court refuses to cancel the land-for-jobs FIR against Lalu Prasad
  • The spectre of El Nino haunts India: IMD predicts 'below normal ' monsoon this year
  • Labour protest over increase in wages by 35% (as per Haryana example) turns violent in Noida, nearly 200 were detained by the police
  • Congress leader Sonia Gandhi said that the delimitation exercise must be carried out after the Census is complete
  • PM Modi says Parliament is on the verge of creating history as the Houses get ready to take up the women's reservation bills
  • Tata Sons chairman N Chandrasekaran said that TCS COO Aarthi Subramanian is conducting a thorough inquiry to establish facts and identify individuals involved in the sexual harassment allegations at the company's Nashik office
  • Asha Bhonsle laid to rest with full state honours on Monday in Mumbai
  • AAP leader Arvind Kejriwal once again approached the Delhi HC to request the recusal of a judge from his case
  • Candidates Chess: R Vaishali on the verge of creating history, but needs two wins - one with black pieces - against formidable opponents to emerge as the challenger
  • Rohit Sharma, who retired hurt in the match versus RCB, underwent scans for possible hamstring injury
  • IPL: Abhishek Sharma fails for SRH but Ishan Kishan (91) shines. Then, Vaibhav Sooryavanshi fails for RR and SRH bolwers, especially unheralded Praful Hinge (4 for 24) and Sakib Hussain (4 for 24) win it for SRH. This was the first loss for table-toppers RR
Supreme Court questions Election Commission about SIR SOP and why logical discrepancy was introduced only in Bengal
oppn parties
US Versus China: President Trump And The Intelligence Establishment Differ In Their Opinion

By A Special Correspondent
First publised on 2020-05-01 19:02:16

Two conflicting news items from the US showed how the Covid-19 crisis is being viewed differently by different sections of the decision making machinery in that country. In the first item, the US Office for the Director of National Intelligence issued a statement confirming Covid-19 originated in China. But it also said that "the intelligence community also concurs with the wide scientific consensus that the Covid-19 virus was not man-made or genetically modified." The agency also reported that the intelligence chiefs were working to find out whether Covid-19 "began through contact with infected animals, or if it was the result of an accident in a laboratory in Wuhan."

In direct contrast to this, US President Donald Trump seemed to trash intelligence reports and suggested that he had evidence to prove that the Chinese made the virus and released it. When he was asked if he had seen anything that has given him such a high degree of confidence that the Wuhan Institute of Virology was the source of the outbreak, Trump replied in the affirmative. Trump said he could "do it differently" and act in "probably a little bit more of a forthright manner" when asked about reports that he could cancel US debt obligations to China.

President Trump had earlier accused China of spreading the virus and misleading the world and the WHO in this regard. He even stopped the US funding for the WHO pending an inquiry. It is now clear that he will make China’s involvement in releasing and allowing the spread of the Covid-19 virus his main reelection plank. But since reports are emerging from the scientific community that suggests that the virus does not show any genetic modification and is probably not man-made, it remains to be seen how the US public will take his assertions in the absence of any solid proof linking China’s active involvement.

It seems his charge of China’s initial attempt to mislead the world is going to stick. China did not do enough to alert the other countries or the scientists across the world about the emergence of a novel off-shoot of the coronavirus which was not responding to any current vaccines or medicines. Neither did it act promptly to stop its spread by imposing travel restrictions. Hence, Trump’s ire with China is justified. But the US public will also question his initial carefree attitude, despite the problems that were being faced in Europe, that allowed the virus to spread so rapidly in the United States.