oppn parties US Versus China: President Trump And The Intelligence Establishment Differ In Their Opinion

News Snippets

  • Government to introduce PF for self-emplyed and gig workers
  • Crush at Puri Rathyatra leaves 2 dead and 78 injured
  • NEET-UG, marred in controversy due to pape4r leak, saw a huge increase in top scores as two scored 715/720 and 11.2 lkah candidates cleared the exam
  • India's first hydrogen-powered train will be flagged off by PM Modi from Jind in Haryana
  • Delhi HC asks the government to monitor Sona Wnagchuk's health regularly
  • TMC Rajya Sabha MP Koel Mallick resigns from her seat, leaves TMC. Mamata asks all those wishing to leave the party to do so before July 21
  • Calcutta HC says land deed is not a proof of citizenship. Refuses to provide protection to a man facing deportation on basis of land deed
  • Supreme Court tells the government to teach the third language in the 3-language formula in Class 6 and not Class 9
  • Government to take steps to boost liquidity for small businesses
  • RBI says that banks cannot sell seized assets back to the defaulters
  • Centre decides to take equity stakes in semiconductor startups
  • Markets remain flat on Thursday: Sensex closes just 1 point ahead and Nifty ended 5 point lower
  • BCCI:Selectors have possibly decided that Rohit Sharma will not be selected for ODIs after the Lord's game on Sunday
  • Japan Open badminton: P V Sindhu stuns world no. 5 Han Yue of China 21-16, 21-14 to enter the quarterfinals
  • 2nd ODI versus England: Indian batting fails miserably except Gill, Kohli and Iyer to score just 233 all out. England win by 4 wickets
Supreme Court clarifies that it has not issued a blanket ban on use of bulldozers, and they can be used after compliance with procedure laid down in civil laws
oppn parties
US Versus China: President Trump And The Intelligence Establishment Differ In Their Opinion

By A Special Correspondent
First publised on 2020-05-01 19:02:16

Two conflicting news items from the US showed how the Covid-19 crisis is being viewed differently by different sections of the decision making machinery in that country. In the first item, the US Office for the Director of National Intelligence issued a statement confirming Covid-19 originated in China. But it also said that "the intelligence community also concurs with the wide scientific consensus that the Covid-19 virus was not man-made or genetically modified." The agency also reported that the intelligence chiefs were working to find out whether Covid-19 "began through contact with infected animals, or if it was the result of an accident in a laboratory in Wuhan."

In direct contrast to this, US President Donald Trump seemed to trash intelligence reports and suggested that he had evidence to prove that the Chinese made the virus and released it. When he was asked if he had seen anything that has given him such a high degree of confidence that the Wuhan Institute of Virology was the source of the outbreak, Trump replied in the affirmative. Trump said he could "do it differently" and act in "probably a little bit more of a forthright manner" when asked about reports that he could cancel US debt obligations to China.

President Trump had earlier accused China of spreading the virus and misleading the world and the WHO in this regard. He even stopped the US funding for the WHO pending an inquiry. It is now clear that he will make China’s involvement in releasing and allowing the spread of the Covid-19 virus his main reelection plank. But since reports are emerging from the scientific community that suggests that the virus does not show any genetic modification and is probably not man-made, it remains to be seen how the US public will take his assertions in the absence of any solid proof linking China’s active involvement.

It seems his charge of China’s initial attempt to mislead the world is going to stick. China did not do enough to alert the other countries or the scientists across the world about the emergence of a novel off-shoot of the coronavirus which was not responding to any current vaccines or medicines. Neither did it act promptly to stop its spread by imposing travel restrictions. Hence, Trump’s ire with China is justified. But the US public will also question his initial carefree attitude, despite the problems that were being faced in Europe, that allowed the virus to spread so rapidly in the United States.