oppn parties West Bengal: Arrests, Dharna, Bail and Stay Order

News Snippets

  • Government to introduce PF for self-emplyed and gig workers
  • Crush at Puri Rathyatra leaves 2 dead and 78 injured
  • NEET-UG, marred in controversy due to pape4r leak, saw a huge increase in top scores as two scored 715/720 and 11.2 lkah candidates cleared the exam
  • India's first hydrogen-powered train will be flagged off by PM Modi from Jind in Haryana
  • Delhi HC asks the government to monitor Sona Wnagchuk's health regularly
  • TMC Rajya Sabha MP Koel Mallick resigns from her seat, leaves TMC. Mamata asks all those wishing to leave the party to do so before July 21
  • Calcutta HC says land deed is not a proof of citizenship. Refuses to provide protection to a man facing deportation on basis of land deed
  • Supreme Court tells the government to teach the third language in the 3-language formula in Class 6 and not Class 9
  • Government to take steps to boost liquidity for small businesses
  • RBI says that banks cannot sell seized assets back to the defaulters
  • Centre decides to take equity stakes in semiconductor startups
  • Markets remain flat on Thursday: Sensex closes just 1 point ahead and Nifty ended 5 point lower
  • BCCI:Selectors have possibly decided that Rohit Sharma will not be selected for ODIs after the Lord's game on Sunday
  • Japan Open badminton: P V Sindhu stuns world no. 5 Han Yue of China 21-16, 21-14 to enter the quarterfinals
  • 2nd ODI versus England: Indian batting fails miserably except Gill, Kohli and Iyer to score just 233 all out. England win by 4 wickets
Supreme Court clarifies that it has not issued a blanket ban on use of bulldozers, and they can be used after compliance with procedure laid down in civil laws
oppn parties
West Bengal: Arrests, Dharna, Bail and Stay Order

By A Special Correspondent
First publised on 2021-05-18 03:22:18

The CBI today arrested two senior TMC leaders and ministers in the state cabinet,  Subrata Mukherjee and Firhad Hakim, along with TMC MLA Madan Mitra and former Kolkata mayor Sovan Chatterjee in the Narada tapes case. This led to a huge uproar and chief minister Mamata Banerjee camped outside the CBI main office in Kolkata. She said that these leaders were arrested without due process and challenged the CBI to arrest her too. The area was swamped by party supporters, some of whom turned unruly and threw stones at the Central forces who tried to remove them with batons.

Normally, MLAs are arrested after obtaining permission from the assembly Speaker. But in this case, the CBI obtained the permission from state governor Jagdeep Dhankhar. Dhankhar later said that he gave permission as he had sworn in Mukherjee and Hakim as ministers using his discretion under Articles 163 and 164 of the constitution. Mamata Banerjee said this was a clear contravention of norms and due process. She said that the CBI should have taken permission from the Speaker of the state assembly. Her nephew and party leader Abhishek Banerjee asked all to maintain calm and said that the party had full faith in the judiciary and will fight the battle legally.

Later in the day, the Special CBI court granted bail to the arrested accused saying that mere asking for judicial custody cannot be granted as there is no prayer for custody for further interrogation. But the CBI approached the Calcutta HC which stayed the order and posted the case for hearing on Wednesday. The CBI then made arrangements to take the accused to the presidency jail.

Questions are being raised in the manner of arrests as also the fact that others like Mukul Roy and Suvendhu Adhikari, who were also named in the Narada tapes but left the TMC to join the BJP, were not arrested. To be fair to the CBI, it has applied for sanction to move against Roy and Adhikari to Lok Speaker but it has not been granted yet. In any case, law must move fairly against all accused and being selective in prosecuting some is likely to boomerang on the CBI. This matter is now to be decided by the courts whether the governor was right in granting permission for prosecution or whether the CBI should have taken the Speaker’s nod.