oppn parties Where Is The Data To Support The Allegation?

News Snippets

  • NCLT initiates bankruptcy proceedings against former Videocon chairman Venugopal Dhoot for defaulting on loans of Rs 6158cr as personal guarantor in two group companies
  • LIC approves 1:1 bonus share issue
  • Gold and silver futures also go down by 0.7% and 2.2% respectively
  • Stocks tumbled again on Monday as crude prices rose: Sensex went down by 703 points and Nifty by 207 points
  • Supreme Court refuses to cancel the land-for-jobs FIR against Lalu Prasad
  • The spectre of El Nino haunts India: IMD predicts 'below normal ' monsoon this year
  • Labour protest over increase in wages by 35% (as per Haryana example) turns violent in Noida, nearly 200 were detained by the police
  • Congress leader Sonia Gandhi said that the delimitation exercise must be carried out after the Census is complete
  • PM Modi says Parliament is on the verge of creating history as the Houses get ready to take up the women's reservation bills
  • Tata Sons chairman N Chandrasekaran said that TCS COO Aarthi Subramanian is conducting a thorough inquiry to establish facts and identify individuals involved in the sexual harassment allegations at the company's Nashik office
  • Asha Bhonsle laid to rest with full state honours on Monday in Mumbai
  • AAP leader Arvind Kejriwal once again approached the Delhi HC to request the recusal of a judge from his case
  • Candidates Chess: R Vaishali on the verge of creating history, but needs two wins - one with black pieces - against formidable opponents to emerge as the challenger
  • Rohit Sharma, who retired hurt in the match versus RCB, underwent scans for possible hamstring injury
  • IPL: Abhishek Sharma fails for SRH but Ishan Kishan (91) shines. Then, Vaibhav Sooryavanshi fails for RR and SRH bolwers, especially unheralded Praful Hinge (4 for 24) and Sakib Hussain (4 for 24) win it for SRH. This was the first loss for table-toppers RR
Supreme Court questions Election Commission about SIR SOP and why logical discrepancy was introduced only in Bengal
oppn parties
Where Is The Data To Support The Allegation?

By A Special Correspondent
First publised on 2021-06-13 04:46:36

Newly appointed Assam chief minister Himanta Biswa Sarma chose to ignore facts and joined those who spread misinformation about the Muslim community when he alleged that they have too many children. Sarma asked the Muslims in Assam to adopt proper family planning methods to stop population explosion in their community. But though it sounded good to the constituency he caters to, this charge is not backed by data. 

Yes at one time the Muslim population in Assam was expanding at the rate of 3.64 percent every year. But that was way back in 2005-06, as verified by the National Family Health Surveys (NFHS) that year. Since then, it has dropped to 2.4 percent in the NFHS conducted in 2019-20, which is very close to the overall fertility rate of 1.9 percent in Assam. The fertility rates between 2005-06 and 2019-20 show that while the Hindu rate dropped from 1.95% to 1.6% while that of the Muslims dropped from 3.64% to 2.4%.

Muslim males are regularly charged with marrying four times and giving birth to numerous children. The first charge is not supported by the fact that India has only 940 females per 1000 males as per the 2011 Census. If one Muslim man was to marry four times, is it not true that more than three others will not find women to marry? So how will they marry even once, let alone four times? As for having too any children, Census data or NFHS data does not support the theory of an unnatural or exponential growth of Muslim population. These are age-old myths that are being perpetuated by vested interests to indulge in Muslim-bashing.

Education and economic compulsions, along with the fact that the joint family system has given way to nuclear families, have ensured that couples, including Muslim couples, plan their family to provide good upbringing to their children. It is wrong to keep on alleging that Muslims are contributing to population explosion when facts do not prove so.